A 78-year-old man with end-stage ischemic cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction 15%) and NYHA class IV heart failure is admitted to an inpatient hospice facility. He has a biventricular pacemaker with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (CRT-D) in place. Upon admission, a 'Do Not Resuscitate' order is confirmed. On his second day in the facility, his condition declines; he becomes obtunded and is determined to be in the actively dying phase. Shortly after, he experiences a sustained episode of ventricular tachycardia and receives a high-voltage shock from his CRT-D, causing his body to jolt and resulting in visible physical distress. His wife, who is his legally designated healthcare proxy, is at his bedside. She is terrified by the event and asks the attending physician to 'turn the machine off' to prevent further shocks. However, she expresses fear that doing so will cause him to immediately suffocate. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- AConsult electrophysiology to urgently deactivate both the defibrillating and the pacing functions of the device.
- BTransfer the patient to a cardiac step-down unit for telemetry monitoring while awaiting a device technician.
- Place a clinical magnet over the device and reassure the wife that this will solely disable the shock function.Cevap
- DInform the wife that a court order determining the patient's legal competence is required before the device can be deactivated.
- EContact the patient's adult children to obtain unanimous family consensus before altering the function of the device.