A 34-year-old woman is rushed to the operating room for a ruptured ectopic pregnancy with severe hemorrhagic shock. During the massive transfusion protocol, the circulating nurse bypasses the manual surgical count to expedite abdominal packing. A hospital supply chain decision three months prior had placed visually identical laparotomy sponges and standard absorbent towels in the same trauma cart. Postoperatively, the attending surgeon attributes the patient's persistent tachycardia entirely to expected recovery from hypovolemia, delaying the diagnosis of a retained item. A month later, the patient is readmitted with an intra-abdominal abscess secondary to a retained laparotomy sponge.
Following the event, a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) panel proposes two distinct interventions: implementing surgical instrument trays that physically lock and cannot be closed if an RFID-tagged sponge is missing from the sterile field, and updating the departmental policy manual to mandate mandatory staff retraining on surgical counts.
Match each specific element of this event or proposed intervention to its correct patient safety and error science classification.
- Bypassing the manual surgical count to expedite abdominal packingActive error (sharp-end failure)
- Stocking visually identical laparotomy sponges and standard towels in the same cartLatent condition (blunt-end failure)
- Trays that physically lock if an RFID-tagged sponge is missingForcing function (strong safety intervention)
- Updating policy manuals and requiring mandatory staff retrainingAdministrative control (weak safety intervention)
- Attributing postoperative tachycardia entirely to hypovolemia despite ongoing symptomsAnchoring bias (cognitive error)