Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumIdentifying Points of Disagreement

### Amphibian Population Declines

Amphibian populations worldwide have experienced severe declines over the past several decades. Two scientists discuss the primary causes of these declines.

Scientist 1
Global amphibian declines are driven primarily by the spread of the chytrid fungus (*Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis*). This pathogen infects the skin of amphibians, disrupting their osmotic regulation and causing death. While climate change and habitat loss may stress populations, the direct causal agent of these mass mortality events is the fungal pathogen. Outbreaks occur even in pristine, undisturbed habitats, demonstrating that environmental contamination is not a prerequisite for population collapse.

Scientist 2
The primary driver of global amphibian declines is agricultural runoff containing chemical pesticides, particularly atrazine. These contaminants act as endocrine disruptors, weakening the amphibians' immune systems and making them highly susceptible to opportunistic infections, including the chytrid fungus. The fungus itself has coexisted with amphibians for decades without causing massive declines. Only when chemical contamination compromises the host's physiological defenses do lethal disease outbreaks occur. Therefore, pesticide regulation, not pathogen eradication, is the key to conservation.

Scientist 1 and Scientist 2 differ in their views regarding which of the following questions?

  1. Whether environmental chemical contamination is a necessary condition for the chytrid fungus to cause lethal population declines.Answer
  2. B
    Whether the chytrid fungus plays a role in the death of amphibians.
  3. C
    Whether the chytrid fungus acts as an endocrine disruptor in amphibian populations.
  4. D
    Whether climate change is the primary driver of amphibian population collapses.

Answer

The scientists disagree on whether environmental chemical contamination is a necessary condition for the chytrid fungus to cause lethal population declines.
The correct answer is that they disagree on whether environmental contamination is a necessary condition for the fungus to cause lethal declines. Scientist 1 states that outbreaks occur even in pristine, undisturbed habitats, indicating contamination is not a prerequisite. Scientist 2 argues that lethal outbreaks only occur when host defenses are compromised by chemical pesticides, meaning contamination is a prerequisite.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Scientist 1's claim about environmental conditions.
Scientist 1 states that fungal outbreaks occur in pristine, undisturbed habitats, showing that environmental contamination is not a prerequisite for population collapse.
This establishes Scientist 1's view on the necessity of environmental contamination.
2
Analyze Scientist 2's claim about environmental conditions.
Scientist 2 states that the fungus has coexisted with amphibians for decades without causing declines, and that outbreaks only become lethal when host defenses are compromised by chemical pesticides.
This establishes Scientist 2's view that chemical contamination is a necessary prerequisite.
3
Compare the two views to identify the point of disagreement.
Scientist 1 believes contamination is not a prerequisite, while Scientist 2 believes contamination is a necessary condition for lethal declines. This constitutes a direct point of disagreement.
This confirms the primary conflict between the two hypotheses.

Key Concept

Identifying Points of Disagreement
Rate this question

Topics

Identifying Points of Disagreement

More questions from this topic