Question

Difficulty: Very hardIdentifying Explicit Details

The following passage is adapted from an essay on the history of atmospheric physics.

By the turn of the twentieth century, physicists were puzzled by a persistent phenomenon: electroscopes, which measure electric charge, slowly discharged over time even when kept in lead-shielded containers. This spontaneous discharge indicated that the air inside was somehow being ionized, or made conductive, by an external source of radiation. The prevailing scientific consensus attributed this ionization to gamma radiation emitting from radioactive materials, such as uranium and radium, embedded in the Earth’s crust. It was assumed that this terrestrial radiation would weaken rapidly as one moved away from the ground, eventually dissipating to zero at high altitudes.

In 19101910, the German physicist Theodor Wulf, a Jesuit priest and pioneer in electroscopy, sought to measure this expected decay. He designed a portable, highly sensitive electroscope and transported it to the top of the Eiffel Tower, approximately 300 meters300\text{ meters} above the ground. According to Wulf’s calculations, if the radiation originated solely from the Earth, the ionization rate at that height should have dropped to a small fraction of the ground-level value. Instead, his measurements showed that the radiation level at the tower’s summit remained at nearly 64%64\% of the ground value—far higher than could be explained by terrestrial emission alone, given that gamma rays should be heavily absorbed by the intervening air. While Wulf’s results suggested the existence of an additional source of radiation, his findings were largely discounted by contemporary physicists, who blamed instrumental defects or local atmospheric factors for the discrepancy.

Determined to resolve the mystery, the Austrian physicist Victor Hess designed a series of daring experiments. Hess reasoned that the only way to obtain definitive data was to take measurements at altitudes far exceeding the height of any man-made structure. He commissioned the construction of electroscopes capable of withstanding extreme temperature and pressure fluctuations and began a series of balloon ascents starting in 19111911.

Hess’s experimental breakthrough occurred on August 7, 19121912, during his seventh balloon flight. Accompanied by a pilot and a meteorological observer, Hess boarded the balloon *Böhmen* in Aussig, Austria (now in the Czech Republic). He carried three independent ionization chambers, which were hermetically sealed to prevent changes in air pressure from affecting the internal gas. The balloon drifted northwards, eventually reaching a peak altitude of approximately 5300 meters5{}300\text{ meters}.

As the balloon ascended, Hess meticulously recorded the ionization rates from his instruments. During the initial phase of the flight, up to an altitude of about 1000 meters1{}000\text{ meters}, the radiation levels decreased slightly, aligning with the theory of terrestrial decay. However, as the balloon climbed past 1000 meters1{}000\text{ meters}, Hess observed a striking reversal: the ionization rate began to climb steadily. By the time the *Böhmen* reached 5300 meters5{}300\text{ meters}, the rate of ionization was about four times greater than it had been at sea level. Because the air at such altitudes was too thin to contain significant quantities of radioactive crustal dust, Hess concluded that a highly penetrating radiation must be entering the atmosphere from above.

Crucially, Hess needed to determine whether this radiation was solar in origin. To test this, he had previously conducted a flight during a near-total solar eclipse on April 17, 19121912. Despite the Sun being almost completely obscured by the Moon, Hess recorded no drop in ionization levels. This critical observation led him to conclude that the source of the radiation was not the Sun, but rather deep space. Hess published his findings later that year, proposing the existence of an undocumented, extra-terrestrial source of radiation. Although his theory was initially met with skepticism, it was eventually confirmed by subsequent experiments, and in 19361936, Hess was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for his discovery of what Robert Millikan would later term "cosmic rays."

According to the passage, what did Theodor Wulf observe regarding the radiation level at the top of the Eiffel Tower during his 19101910 experiments?

  1. It was approximately 64%64\% of the level recorded at ground level.Answer
  2. B
    It had decreased by nearly 64%64\% from the level recorded at ground level.
  3. C
    It was roughly four times greater than the level recorded at ground level.
  4. D
    It had dropped to a small fraction of the ground-level value due to atmospheric absorption.

Answer

The correct answer states that the radiation level was approximately sixty-four percent of the level recorded at ground level.
The correct answer is supported by the second paragraph, which explicitly states that Wulf's measurements at the top of the Eiffel Tower showed the radiation level 'remained at nearly 64%64\% of the ground value.' This matches the statement that the level was approximately sixty-four percent of the level recorded at ground level.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Locate the portion of the passage that describes Theodor Wulf's Eiffel Tower experiments in 19101910.
The second paragraph details Wulf's ascent to the top of the tower (300 meters300\text{ meters}) and his recorded measurements.
This isolates the relevant text containing the explicit detail needed to answer the question.
2
Extract the specific measurement Wulf recorded at the summit of the tower.
The text states that 'his measurements showed that the radiation level at the tower’s summit remained at nearly 64%64\% of the ground value.'
This provides the literal fact that must match the correct option.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the one that accurately represents this detail without distortion.
The choice stating the level was approximately sixty-four percent of the ground-level value is a direct and accurate paraphrase. The option stating it had decreased by nearly sixty-four percent is a mathematical distortion (as remaining at 64%64\% means a decrease of only 36%36\%).
This ensures that distractors involving subtle word shifts or misidentified details from other parts of the text are eliminated.

Key Concept

Identifying Explicit Details
Rate this question