The writer is considering deleting the following sentence from the passage:
'Monarch butterflies lay their eggs on milkweed plants because they are the only food source for the caterpillars.'
If the passage focuses on the migratory patterns of monarch butterflies, should the writer make this deletion?
- Yes, because the sentence interrupts the explanation of the migratory journey with irrelevant information about the butterfly's reproductive cycle and larval diet.Answer
- BYes, because the sentence contradicts the fact that monarch butterflies travel to Mexico to survive the winter.
- CNo, because the sentence provides a necessary transition between the description of the flight south and the overall length of the journey.
- DNo, because the sentence explains the biological motivation for why millions of monarchs migrate south in the autumn.
Answer
Yes, because the sentence interrupts the explanation of the migratory journey with irrelevant information about the butterfly's reproductive cycle and larval diet.
The correct option is the one stating that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the focus of the paragraph. The paragraph focuses on the details of the monarch butterfly's migratory journey, while the sentence in question shifts the topic to reproduction and larval diet, which is irrelevant to migration.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Evaluating the relevance of sentences to maintain paragraph unity and cohesion.