Sentence Addition and Deletion Decisions

36 questions

Question 1Question

[1] For decades, art historians believed that the vibrant blue pigment in Johannes Vermeer’s paintings was derived exclusively from ultramarine, a costly paint made from crushed lapis lazuli. [2] Vermeer's lavish use of this expensive material contributed significantly to the chronic debt that plagued his family. [3] However, recent chemical analysis of several canvases, including Girl with a Pearl Earring, reveals a more calculating reality: Vermeer frequently blended ultramarine with smalt, a cheaper pigment made from ground cobalt glass. [4] This blending technique allowed him to achieve his signature luminous glazes without depleting his scarce resources. [5] By layering the cheaper smalt underneath a thin topcoat of pure ultramarine, Vermeer created the optical illusion of deep, costly blue while conserving his precious supply of lapis lazuli.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence to the paragraph:

"Lapis lazuli was imported to Europe primarily from mines in northeastern Afghanistan, making the mineral more valuable than gold at the time."

Should the writer make this addition?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because it departs from the paragraph's focus on Vermeer's specific pigment-blending techniques to discuss the geographical source and trade value of lapis lazuli.

Answer

No, because it departs from the paragraph's focus on Vermeer's specific pigment-blending techniques to discuss the geographical source and trade value of lapis lazuli.
The correct option is correct because the proposed sentence introduces details about the geographical origin and market value of lapis lazuli, which are digressive and distract from the paragraph's core focus on Vermeer's pigment-blending techniques.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph explains how Vermeer blended expensive ultramarine with cheaper smalt to create the illusion of costly blue while saving money.
Understanding the paragraph's core focus is necessary to evaluate the relevance of any proposed additions.
2
Analyze the content and purpose of the proposed sentence.
The proposed sentence details where lapis lazuli was mined (Afghanistan) and its historical value relative to gold.
Evaluating the proposed sentence allows the reader to determine if it aligns with or disrupts the paragraph's focus.
3
Compare the proposed sentence's focus with the paragraph's focus.
The geographical origin and general market value of lapis lazuli are digressive details that do not contribute to the explanation of Vermeer's artistic technique or conservation strategy.
Identifying this digression leads to the correct decision to reject the addition.

Key Concept

Evaluating the relevance of a proposed sentence by determining whether it aligns with the established focus of the paragraph or introduces a digression.
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 2Question

Although the impact of the 1883 Krakatoa eruption on global temperatures is well-documented, its influence on nineteenth-century British art remains a subject of debate. Some art historians argue that the vibrant, crimson sunsets in William Ashcroft’s pastel drawings from the mid-1880s were direct records of the volcanic aerosols that dispersed worldwide.

[1] Ashcroft, who resided in Chelsea, London, created thousands of these quick sketches from his west-facing window, starting just months after the cataclysm.

Others, however, contend that his palette was merely a continuation of a pre-existing British aesthetic tradition of dramatic twilight scenes, suggesting the volcanic dust was coincidental to his style.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 1 (marked by [1]) from the passage. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Kept, because it provides essential geographical and chronological context that supports the argument that Ashcroft’s work recorded the eruption’s actual atmospheric effects.

Answer

Kept, because it provides essential geographical and chronological context that supports the argument that Ashcroft’s work recorded the eruption’s actual atmospheric effects.
The correct choice is to keep the sentence because it provides essential geographical and chronological context that supports the argument that Ashcroft’s work recorded the eruption’s actual atmospheric effects. The details that he painted in London (showing the global reach of the volcanic dust) and began just months after the eruption (when the atmospheric aerosols would still be present) are critical pieces of evidence for the historians who argue his art was a literal record.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main idea and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph discusses a debate among art historians regarding whether William Ashcroft's mid-1880s sunset drawings literally recorded the atmospheric effects of the 1883 Krakatoa eruption or were simply stylistic choices.
Understanding the paragraph's focus is necessary to determine whether the sentence in question contributes to or detracts from that focus.
2
Evaluate the specific information provided in Sentence 1.
Sentence 1 states where Ashcroft painted (Chelsea, London), how he painted (from his west-facing window), and when he started (just months after the eruption).
This step identifies the exact evidence and context the sentence adds to the passage.
3
Determine the logical connection between Sentence 1 and the surrounding arguments.
The timing ('just months after') is critical because volcanic aerosols in the atmosphere are temporary; sketches created long after would not be direct records. The location (London) shows that the effects were visible globally. Therefore, the sentence provides essential support for the argument that the drawings were direct records.
This establishes the rhetorical function of the sentence, proving it should be kept.
4
Evaluate the justifications in the options to find the correct match.
The choice proposing to keep the sentence because of geographical and chronological context matches our analysis. The other options mischaracterize the text or the paragraph's focus.
This eliminates the distractors and confirms the correct option.

Key Concept

Evaluating relevance for adding or deleting content based on paragraph focus and evidentiary support
Question 3Question

Passage

For over a century, the giant tortoises of the Galápagos Islands have fascinated biologists studying evolutionary adaptation. These massive reptiles, which can weigh up to 500 pounds, have developed distinct shell shapes depending on the environment of their specific island. On wetter islands with abundant low-growing plants, tortoises have dome-shaped shells that keep their necks closer to the ground. On drier islands where food grows higher up, they have 'saddleback' shells with a high arch that allows them to stretch their necks upward to reach tree cacti. *Charles Darwin visited the Galápagos Islands in 1835.* This physical variation directly illustrates how species adapt to their local habitats over generations.

Question

The writer is considering deleting the italicized sentence from the passage. Should the writer make this deletion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it interrupts the discussion of tortoise shell adaptations with unrelated biographical information.

Answer

Deleted, because it interrupts the discussion of tortoise shell adaptations with unrelated biographical information.
The correct answer states that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the discussion of tortoise shell adaptations with unrelated biographical information. The paragraph details how dome-shaped and saddleback shells allow tortoises to feed in different environments. Mentioning the year Darwin visited the islands deviates from this specific biological explanation and disrupts the paragraph's cohesion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes how giant tortoises on different Galápagos islands have developed distinct shell shapes (dome-shaped vs. saddleback) to adapt to their respective environments.
Understanding the paragraph's central theme is necessary to determine if the proposed sentence contributes to or detracts from that theme.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the italicized sentence to this focus.
The sentence 'Charles Darwin visited the Galápagos Islands in 1835' introduces a historical and biographical detail that does not explain or elaborate on the shell adaptations of the tortoises.
This step determines whether the sentence supports the main idea or functions as an irrelevant digression.
3
Choose the option that correctly identifies that the sentence should be deleted and provides the accurate logical justification.
The option stating that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the discussion of tortoise shell adaptations with unrelated biographical information is correct.
This aligns with the rhetorical purpose of maintaining unity and focus within a paragraph.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 4Question

A student is writing an essay about the invention of the Post-it Note.

[1] In 1968, Spencer Silver, a chemist at 3M, was attempting to develop a super-strong adhesive for the aerospace industry. [2] Instead, he accidentally created a 'low-tack' adhesive that could be easily peeled off surfaces without leaving any residue. [3] Years later, his co-worker Art Fry realized this weak adhesive could be used to keep bookmarks from falling out of his hymnal. [4] This simple concept led to the creation of the Post-it Note, which is now a staple in offices worldwide.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence after Sentence 2:

'Super-strong adhesives are also used in construction to bond heavy building materials together.'

Should the writer make this addition?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because it interrupts the narrative flow by introducing an irrelevant detail about the construction industry.

Answer

No, because it interrupts the narrative flow by introducing an irrelevant detail about the construction industry.
The proposed sentence should not be added because it introduces details about the construction industry that are irrelevant to the paragraph's primary focus on the invention and development of the Post-it Note.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the accidental invention and development of the Post-it Note from a weak adhesive.
Before deciding whether to add information, you must establish the topic and scope of the passage.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the proposed sentence.
The proposed sentence discusses how super-strong adhesives are used in construction, which is unrelated to the creation of the weak-adhesive Post-it Note.
Determining if the sentence supports the main topic helps decide whether it should be added or not.
3
Select the option that correctly identifies that the sentence should not be added and provides a valid logical justification.
The correct option states that the sentence should not be added because it introduces an irrelevant detail about construction.
This matches the rhetorical goal of keeping the passage focused and cohesive.

Key Concept

Evaluating sentence relevance for addition or deletion decisions based on passage focus.
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 5Question

Many cities are replacing traditional streetlights with light-emitting diode (LED) bulbs to save energy. These modern bulbs consume up to 80 percent less electricity than standard sodium vapor lamps. Although LEDs are highly efficient, some residents complain that the cool, blue-white light they emit is too harsh compared to the warm glow of older lights. Sodium vapor lamps were first developed in the 1930s and became popular for street lighting due to their long lifespan. Consequently, some municipalities are adjusting the color temperature of their new LED installations to address these concerns.

The writer is considering deleting the sentence 'Sodium vapor lamps were first developed in the 1930s and became popular for street lighting due to their long lifespan.' from the passage. Should this sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on LED streetlights with irrelevant historical information about sodium vapor lamps.

Answer

The correct answer is that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on LED streetlights with irrelevant historical information about sodium vapor lamps.
The main focus of the paragraph is the modern transition from traditional streetlights to LED bulbs, specifically highlighting energy savings and residents' complaints about the cool color temperature of LEDs. The sentence about the 1930s development and popularity of sodium vapor lamps is a historical tangent that does not contribute to this focus. Therefore, it should be deleted.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main topic of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on the modern transition from sodium vapor streetlights to energy-efficient LED streetlights, including residents' complaints about LED light quality and how municipalities are addressing them.
To determine if a sentence belongs in a paragraph, you must first understand the paragraph's primary focus.
2
Analyze the content and purpose of the sentence proposed for deletion.
The sentence provides historical context about when sodium vapor lamps were developed (the 1930s) and why they were popular (long lifespan).
This helps determine whether the sentence supports the main topic or introduces a distraction.
3
Evaluate whether the sentence contributes to the main topic or should be deleted.
The historical details about sodium vapor lamps are not relevant to the modern transition to LEDs or the discussion of light temperature. The sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the focus of the paragraph.
Off-topic sentences should be removed to maintain paragraph unity and cohesion.

Key Concept

Evaluating the relevance of details to maintain paragraph unity and cohesion
Question 6Question

In her seminal 1978 essay, literary theorist Sandra Gilbert examined how nineteenth-century women writers navigated a male-dominated literary landscape. [1] Gilbert argued that these authors often employed a "double-voiced discourse," layering subversive themes beneath seemingly conventional plots. This narrative strategy allowed them to appeal to mainstream publishers while simultaneously communicating a critique of patriarchal structures to receptive readers. Charlotte Brontë’s novel *Jane Eyre*, for instance, features a madwoman in the attic who serves as a dark double for the docile protagonist.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence to the passage at [1]:

"Many nineteenth-century publishers were hesitant to print works that openly challenged domestic expectations of women."

Should the writer make this addition?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because it provides historical context that clarifies the necessity of the "double-voiced discourse" mentioned in the paragraph.

Answer

Yes, because it provides historical context that clarifies the necessity of the "double-voiced discourse" mentioned in the paragraph.
The addition of the proposed sentence is appropriate because it establishes the historical barrier (publishers' hesitation to print controversial material) that compelled nineteenth-century women writers to use a 'double-voiced discourse' to get their work printed while still conveying their critique of patriarchal society.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the proposed sentence to identify its main subject and purpose.
The sentence explains that nineteenth-century publishers hesitated to publish writing that openly challenged traditional female domestic roles.
To determine how the sentence relates to the passage, its core content must first be understood.
2
Evaluate the context surrounding the insertion point to see if the sentence establishes a logical connection.
Before the insertion point, the passage introduces women navigating a male-dominated landscape. After the insertion point, it mentions writers using a 'double-voiced discourse' with hidden subversive themes to appeal to mainstream publishers.
Assessing the sentences before and after the insertion point reveals the logical flow and transition requirements.
3
Assess if the proposed sentence bridges these ideas or adds relevant information.
The proposed sentence connects the male-dominated landscape to the need for double-voiced discourse by explaining why they had to hide their critique: publishers were reluctant to print open challenges.
Determining the rhetorical utility of the sentence dictates whether it should be kept or deleted.
4
Match this function to the correct option and eliminate distractors.
The correct choice must support adding the sentence because it provides the historical context explaining the necessity of the double-voiced discourse.
Eliminating choices with incorrect justifications ensures that the selected option has both the correct decision (Yes) and the correct reason.

Key Concept

Sentence Addition and Deletion Decisions
Question 7Question

[1] For centuries, the dry climate of the library of Saint Catherine's Monastery in Egypt preserved layers of hidden writing on parchment pages known as palimpsests. [2] To reuse the expensive animal hides, medieval scribes frequently scraped away older texts, such as translations of ancient Greek medical treatises, before writing new prayers over them. [3] Modern conservationists, however, have begun employing multispectral imaging to photograph these pages under various wavelengths of light, exposing the faint traces of iron-gall ink left behind by the original authors. [4] These manuscripts are kept in highly controlled environments where temperature and humidity are regulated to prevent the parchment from warping. [5] By combining these digital images, researchers have successfully reconstructed lost works, providing scholars with unprecedented access to classical philosophy.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 4 from the preceding paragraph. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: deleted, because it departs from the paragraph’s focus on the technological process of reading and restoring erased writing.

Answer

The sentence should be deleted because it departs from the paragraph’s focus on the technological process of reading and restoring erased writing.
The correct option correctly identifies that Sentence 4 should be deleted because it interrupts the explanation of how multispectral imaging is used to read and reconstruct palimpsests. Sentence 3 introduces the use of multispectral imaging to photograph the pages, and Sentence 5 explains how combining these digital images allows researchers to reconstruct lost works. Placing a sentence about climate-controlled storage conditions between them disrupts the transition and unity of the paragraph.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main idea of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes how modern conservationists use multispectral imaging (Sentence 3) to photograph and combine images (Sentence 5) to reconstruct lost texts on medieval palimpsests.
Establishing the paragraph's core topic helps determine whether Sentence 4 contributes to or interrupts the narrative flow.
2
Evaluate the function of Sentence 4 within the paragraph.
Sentence 4 describes the controlled temperature and humidity environments used to prevent manuscripts from warping.
This step identifies whether the sentence supports the main topic of imaging and reconstruction or introduces an unrelated detail.
3
Determine if Sentence 4 should be kept or deleted.
The sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the logical transition between the photography stage in Sentence 3 and the digital image combination stage in Sentence 5.
An irrelevant detail about modern storage conditions disrupts the paragraph's unity and focus on the imaging process.

Key Concept

Sentence Addition and Deletion Decisions
Question 8Question

High atop a rocky hill in Sion, Switzerland, the Basilique de Valère houses an extraordinary musical relic: an organ constructed in the early fifteenth century. Unlike most medieval instruments, which have been silenced by decay or altered beyond recognition by subsequent restorations, this organ remains playable. Organ builders in the region often utilized local spruce and pine, which grew slowly in the high altitude and possessed dense acoustic properties. This longevity is largely due to a conservative restoration in 1954 that prioritized preserving the original Gothic pipework rather than updating the mechanism to suit modern tastes.

The writer is considering deleting the third sentence from the passage. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it introduces a general discussion of regional building materials that interrupts the paragraph's focus on the history and preservation of the Valère organ.

Answer

Deleted, because it introduces a general discussion of regional building materials that interrupts the paragraph's focus on the history and preservation of the Valère organ.
The correct choice is to delete the sentence because the paragraph is focused on the history, playability, and specific conservation of the Valère organ in Sion. The detail about regional builders using local spruce and pine for its acoustic properties departs from this specific narrative, interrupting the flow between the discussion of the organ's playability and its 1954 restoration.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph is centered on a specific instrument, the Valère organ, its historical survival, and the 1954 restoration that kept it playable.
Understanding the main idea of the paragraph is necessary to determine if the proposed sentence contributes to or deviates from that focus.
2
Evaluate the content of the third sentence.
The third sentence describes the types of wood (spruce and pine) regional organ builders used and their acoustic properties.
This step assesses whether the sentence's detail is directly relevant to the specific history and restoration of the Valère organ.
3
Compare the sentence's content against the paragraph's focus to choose the correct decision and explanation.
The sentence deviates from the specific history of the Valère organ into general regional building materials. Therefore, it should be deleted because it interrupts the focus.
This step matches the correct deletion action with the accurate logical explanation.

Key Concept

Sentence Addition and Deletion Decisions
Question 9Question

A student is writing an essay about nineteenth-century astronomy.

[1] In 1845, Irish astronomer William Parsons completed construction on the Leviathan of Parsonstown, a reflecting telescope with a six-foot aperture that was the largest in the world at the time. [2] With this massive instrument, Parsons observed and sketched the spiral structure of the Whirlpool Galaxy, a nebula then known as M51. [3] Prior to this discovery, astronomers debated whether nebulae were merely nearby clouds of gas or distant, independent 'island universes' consisting of stars. [4] The detailed drawings produced by Parsons provided crucial visual evidence that suggested a distinct, organized structure. [5] However, because the Leviathan's metal mirror was highly susceptible to tarnishing in the damp Irish climate, Parsons could only use the telescope on a few clear nights each year. [6] It took several decades of further observation with improved instruments to conclusively resolve the debate in favor of the island universe theory.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 5 from the paragraph. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Kept, because it explains the operational limitations that prevented Parsons's observations from immediately resolving the astronomical debate.

Answer

Kept, because it explains the operational limitations that prevented Parsons's observations from immediately resolving the astronomical debate.
The sentence should be kept because it provides the necessary context explaining why Parsons's observations did not immediately resolve the debate. Without it, the transition to the final sentence, which notes that it took several decades of further observation to resolve the debate, lacks logical explanation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the function of the proposed sentence in the context of the entire paragraph.
Sentence 5 explains that the telescope could only be used on a few clear nights due to mirror tarnishing in the damp Irish climate.
Understanding the content of the sentence is the first step to determining its rhetorical purpose.
2
Examine the relationship between Sentence 5 and the surrounding sentences.
Sentence 4 notes that Parsons's drawings suggested a distinct structure, while Sentence 6 states that it took decades of further observations to resolve the debate. Sentence 5 bridges these ideas by explaining why Parsons could not resolve the debate immediately himself.
Determining logical cohesion is necessary to evaluate if a sentence should be kept or deleted.
3
Evaluate the proposed options to select the one that accurately describes this relationship.
Keeping the sentence is correct because it explains the operational limitations that delayed resolution of the debate.
This justifies keeping the sentence to maintain the paragraph's logical unity.

Key Concept

Evaluating whether to keep or delete a sentence based on how it supports the main idea and maintains logical transitions.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 10Question

[1] Sourdough bread relies on a wild yeast starter rather than commercial baker's yeast. [2] This starter, a fermenting mixture of flour and water, captures wild yeasts and beneficial bacteria from the environment. [3] Over time, these microorganisms produce carbon dioxide and lactic acid, giving the bread its characteristic rise and sour flavor. [4] Many commercial bakeries prefer using dry active yeast because it is faster and more predictable. [5] Once the starter is active, it must be regularly fed with fresh flour and water to keep the yeast alive.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 4 from the paragraph. Should this sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's discussion of how wild yeast starters are developed and maintained.

Answer

Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's discussion of how wild yeast starters are developed and maintained.
The correct answer is to delete the sentence because it interrupts the paragraph's discussion of how wild yeast starters are developed and maintained. The paragraph describes the biology, function, and upkeep of wild yeast starters, and introducing commercial bakeries' preferences distracts the reader from this explanation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on how sourdough bread is made using a wild yeast starter, explaining how the starter works and how it is maintained.
Understanding the paragraph's unity is necessary to determine if the sentence is relevant.
2
Evaluate the relevance of Sentence 4 to that main focus.
Sentence 4 shifts the topic to the preferences and speed of commercial bakeries using dry active yeast, which does not relate to making or maintaining a wild yeast starter.
Identifying off-topic sentences is the key step in addition/deletion decisions.
3
Select the option that correctly recommends deleting the sentence and provides the correct reason.
The correct recommendation is to delete the sentence because it interrupts the discussion of wild yeast starters.
This maintains the paragraph's overall cohesion and unity.

Key Concept

Evaluating paragraph cohesion and identifying irrelevant sentences that interrupt the main topic.
Question 11Question

[1] In the mid-nineteenth century, the construction of the transcontinental railroad transformed the American West, linking the Atlantic and Pacific coasts. [2] The project relied heavily on the labor of thousands of Chinese immigrants, who faced dangerous working conditions and severe discrimination. [3] These workers blasted tunnels through the granite of the Sierra Nevada and laid tracks across the desolate Great Basin. [4] Meanwhile, in the eastern United States, steam locomotives were rapidly replacing canal boats as the primary means of moving freight. [5] Despite their critical contributions, the Chinese workers were excluded from the celebratory photographs taken at Promontory Summit upon the railroad's completion.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 4 from the paragraph. Should this sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the transcontinental railroad's construction and the experiences of its Chinese workers.

Answer

deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the transcontinental railroad's construction and the experiences of its Chinese workers.
The correct answer is the option stating that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the transcontinental railroad's construction and the experiences of its Chinese workers. Sentence 4 describes a transition from canal boats to locomotives in the eastern United States, which is unrelated to the specific challenges and contributions of Chinese immigrant workers in the American West.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine the primary focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on the construction of the transcontinental railroad in the American West and the labor, hardships, and exclusion of Chinese immigrant workers.
Establishing the central theme allows us to evaluate whether Sentence 4 supports or disrupts the unity of the paragraph.
2
Analyze the content and role of Sentence 4.
Sentence 4 describes a shift in the eastern United States from canal boats to steam locomotives for moving freight.
We must understand the specific detail introduced by the sentence to see if it aligns with the paragraph's focus.
3
Assess the relevance of Sentence 4 to the paragraph's focus.
Sentence 4 shifts the geographic location to the East and the topic to general transportation logistics, which is off-topic and interrupts the narrative flow about Chinese laborers in the West.
Identifying this shift reveals that the sentence is irrelevant and should be deleted.
4
Select the option that correctly recommends deletion and provides the accurate justification.
The option recommending deletion because the sentence interrupts the paragraph's focus on the transcontinental railroad and its Chinese workers is correct.
Both the decision to delete and the justification must be logically sound and text-dependent.

Key Concept

Evaluating sentence relevance for addition or deletion decisions based on paragraph focus and unity.
Question 12Question

For centuries, stained glass windows have been used to tell stories and bring vibrant color to places of worship. During the Gothic period, medieval artists created these windows by mixing metallic oxides into molten glass. Copper was added to make red or blue glass, while cobalt yielded a deep, rich blue. [1] Modern stained glass artists often use copper foil to wrap individual pieces of glass before soldering them together. Today, these historical windows are carefully preserved, allowing modern viewers to appreciate their beauty and narrative power.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 1 from the paragraph. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it introduces details about modern craft techniques that interrupt the paragraph's focus on medieval stained glass.

Answer

The sentence should be deleted because it introduces details about modern craft techniques that interrupt the paragraph's focus on medieval stained glass.
The correct answer states that the sentence should be deleted because it introduces details about modern craft techniques that interrupt the paragraph's focus on medieval stained glass. This is correct because the rest of the paragraph describes the history, chemistry, and preservation of medieval stained glass. Introducing a detail about modern soldering and copper foil disrupts the historical narrative.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main topic of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on the history, creation methods, and preservation of medieval stained glass windows.
To determine if Sentence 1 is relevant, we must first establish the central theme of the surrounding text.
2
Analyze the content and purpose of Sentence 1.
Sentence 1 discusses modern stained glass artists and their use of copper foil and soldering.
To compare the sentence's content against the paragraph's central focus.
3
Evaluate whether the sentence should be kept or deleted.
The sentence is off-topic and interrupts the historical flow, so it should be deleted.
Sentences that deviate from the main focus of a passage should be removed to maintain unity.

Key Concept

Evaluating the relevance of a sentence to maintain paragraph unity and cohesion
Estimated Time:45s
Question 13Question

Each spring, maple syrup producers in New England harvest sap from sugar maple trees. To do this, they drill small holes into the tree trunks and insert metal or plastic taps called spiles. Sap, which is mostly water with a low sugar content, drips slowly from these spiles into hanging buckets or plastic tubing. *Sugar maple trees can grow up to eighty feet tall and live for over three hundred years.* This harvested sap is then collected and boiled in large pans inside a sugarhouse. Boiling evaporates the excess water, concentrating the sugars until it becomes the thick, sweet syrup enjoyed on pancakes and waffles.

The writer is considering deleting the italicized sentence from the passage. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's discussion of the process of harvesting and refining maple sap with unrelated facts about the tree's size and lifespan.

Answer

The sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's discussion of the process of harvesting and refining maple sap with unrelated facts about the tree's size and lifespan.
The correct answer is the option suggesting the sentence be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's explanation of the process of harvesting and processing maple sap. The paragraph is structured to describe the steps of making syrup, and details about the physical size and age of the trees do not support this description.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the focus of the surrounding paragraph.
The paragraph details the chronological sequence of maple syrup production: tapping trees, collecting sap, and boiling it to evaporate water.
Identifying the paragraph's main theme allows you to evaluate whether the sentence in question contributes to that theme.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the italicized sentence.
The sentence describes how tall sugar maple trees grow and how long they live.
This step determines whether the information about the tree's growth and lifespan fits the step-by-step process of syrup production.
3
Determine the correct action and justification.
Since the sentence interrupts the flow of the process description with tangential information, it should be deleted. The justification stating that it interrupts the process of harvesting and refining sap is the correct choice.
This completes the evaluation by aligning the decision to delete with the logical reason that the sentence is off-topic.

Key Concept

Evaluating sentence relevance to maintain paragraph unity and cohesion.
Estimated Time:50s
Question 14Question

[1] In 1911, the Italian archaeologist Luigi Pernier discovered the Phaistos Disc in the ruins of a Minoan palace in Crete. [2] The clay disc, covered on both sides with a spiral of stamped symbols, remains one of archaeology’s most famous undeciphered mysteries. [3] Many scholars have tried to decode the 242 signs, which feature representations of human figures, animals, and plants. [4] Some researchers suggest the disc records a sacred hymn, while others argue it is a legal document or a board game. [5] Because the symbols are stamped rather than hand-carved, the disc represents an early precursor to movable type printing, developed thousands of years before Johannes Gutenberg's press.

Given the passage above, the writer is considering adding the following sentence to the end of the paragraph:

"Gutenberg's invention of the printing press in fifteenth-century Germany revolutionized the dissemination of knowledge across Europe."

Should the writer make this addition?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because it introduces a topic—the historical impact of Gutenberg’s press—that deviates from the paragraph's primary focus on the Phaistos Disc.

Answer

The writer should not add the sentence because it introduces a topic (the historical impact of Gutenberg's press) that deviates from the paragraph's primary focus on the Phaistos Disc.
The correct choice correctly identifies that the proposed sentence should not be added because it introduces a new topic—the impact of Gutenberg's press—which is irrelevant to the paragraph's main focus on the Phaistos Disc.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main topic and focus of the existing paragraph.
The paragraph describes the discovery of the Phaistos Disc, its undeciphered symbols, and its status as an early precursor to movable type printing.
To determine if the proposed sentence is relevant, we must first establish the paragraph's central theme.
2
Evaluate the content of the proposed sentence.
The proposed sentence details how Gutenberg's press revolutionized the dissemination of knowledge in Europe.
This allows us to compare the proposed sentence's content with the paragraph's established theme.
3
Determine whether the proposed sentence contributes to the paragraph's focus or diverges from it.
Although Gutenberg is mentioned in the final sentence of the paragraph, expanding on the societal impact of his press shifts the focus away from the Phaistos Disc.
In ACT English, additions that introduce off-topic information should be rejected, even if they have a loose connection (surface relevance) to a word in the passage.

Key Concept

Evaluating relevance when making sentence addition decisions
Question 15Question

[1] At the ancient Mayan city of Chichen Itza, the pyramid known as El Castillo displays a remarkable acoustic phenomenon. [2] When a visitor claps their hands at the base of the staircase, the echo returning from the temple at the summit sounds uncannily like the chirp of the resplendent quetzal, a bird sacred to the Maya. [3] Some archaeologists argue that this acoustic effect was intentional, engineered by Mayan architects to evoke the voice of their deities during ceremonies. [4] The quetzal was highly valued for its vibrant green tail feathers, which were used to make elaborate headdresses for royalty. [5] Skeptics, however, maintain that the chirp is merely an accidental byproduct of the staircase's stair-step geometry.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 4 from the preceding paragraph. Should this sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it introduces details about the quetzal's feathers that are irrelevant to the paragraph's discussion of the pyramid's acoustic properties.

Answer

Deleted, because it introduces details about the quetzal's feathers that are irrelevant to the paragraph's discussion of the pyramid's acoustic properties.
The correct option correctly states that Sentence 4 should be deleted because it introduces details about the quetzal's feathers that are irrelevant to the paragraph's discussion of the pyramid's acoustic properties.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph discusses the acoustic echo at El Castillo pyramid that mimics a quetzal chirp, and the debate over whether this effect was intentional or accidental.
Establishing the paragraph's primary topic is necessary to evaluate if the sentence in question supports or deviates from this focus.
2
Analyze the content and purpose of Sentence 4.
Sentence 4 states that the quetzal was valued for its feathers, which were used to make elaborate headdresses for royalty.
Analyzing the specific details of the sentence helps determine if it contributes to the discussion of acoustics or introduces irrelevant information.
3
Evaluate the deletion decision based on the relevance of the sentence.
Because details about royal headdresses do not relate to the acoustic echo or architectural engineering of the pyramid, the sentence should be deleted.
Removing irrelevant information maintains the unity and cohesion of the paragraph, leading to the correct choice.

Key Concept

Sentence Addition and Deletion Decisions
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 16Question

The writer is considering deleting the following sentence from the passage:

'Monarch butterflies lay their eggs on milkweed plants because they are the only food source for the caterpillars.'

If the passage focuses on the migratory patterns of monarch butterflies, should the writer make this deletion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because the sentence interrupts the explanation of the migratory journey with irrelevant information about the butterfly's reproductive cycle and larval diet.

Answer

Yes, because the sentence interrupts the explanation of the migratory journey with irrelevant information about the butterfly's reproductive cycle and larval diet.
The correct option is the one stating that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the focus of the paragraph. The paragraph focuses on the details of the monarch butterfly's migratory journey, while the sentence in question shifts the topic to reproduction and larval diet, which is irrelevant to migration.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on the migration of monarch butterflies, detailing their journey south to Mexico, the length of the trip, and the multiple generations involved.
Understanding the paragraph's topic is necessary to determine if a sentence is relevant or off-topic.
2
Evaluate the function of the proposed sentence.
The sentence introduces facts about egg-laying on milkweed and caterpillar food sources.
Identifying what the sentence contributes allows us to judge if it supports the main topic.
3
Compare the sentence's function with the paragraph's focus to decide on deletion and find the correct justification.
Since egg-laying and caterpillar food do not relate to the flight path or migration journey, the sentence is irrelevant and interrupts the narrative flow. It should be deleted.
This confirms that deletion is appropriate and aligns with the explanation that the sentence interrupts the focus.

Key Concept

Evaluating the relevance of sentences to maintain paragraph unity and cohesion.
Question 17Question

[1] For decades, art restorers in Pompeii struggled to clean the delicate frescoes blackened by centuries of soot, volcanic ash, and accumulated wax. [2] Traditional chemical solvents often dissolved the ancient pigments beneath the grime, causing irreversible damage to the vibrant red and yellow depictions of mythological scenes. [3] In recent years, however, conservators have turned to laser cleaning technology, which uses short pulses of light to vaporize the dark encrustations without heating or altering the underlying paint. [4] This precise method allows the frescoes to be restored to their original brilliance, revealing details that had been obscured since the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 CE. [5] Lasers have also become increasingly popular in dermatological clinics for removing unwanted tattoos and scars.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 5 from the passage. Should this sentence be deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because it introduces a topic—medical applications of lasers—that is irrelevant to the paragraph's focus on the restoration of ancient Pompeian frescoes.

Answer

Yes, because it introduces a topic—medical applications of lasers—that is irrelevant to the paragraph's focus on the restoration of ancient Pompeian frescoes.
The correct option correctly identifies that the sentence should be deleted because it introduces an unrelated topic—the medical use of lasers for tattoo and scar removal—which deviates from the paragraph's central focus on using lasers for art restoration in Pompeii.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph discusses the history of restoration efforts for ancient frescoes in Pompeii, comparing traditional chemical solvents to modern laser cleaning technology.
Understanding the paragraph's core topic is essential to determine whether any given sentence contributes to or distracts from the main idea.
2
Evaluate the content and function of the proposed sentence for deletion (Sentence 5).
Sentence 5 shifts the topic to medical and dermatological applications of lasers, such as removing tattoos and scars.
This step identifies whether the sentence is relevant to the paragraph's established topic of art restoration.
3
Determine whether the sentence should be kept or deleted.
The sentence should be deleted because it introduces irrelevant information that disrupts the focus on Pompeian art restoration.
Sentences that deviate from the main topic of a paragraph should be deleted to maintain unity and cohesion.

Key Concept

Sentence Addition and Deletion Decisions
Question 18Question

[1] In the early twentieth century, the Chicago school of architecture revolutionized urban design by pioneering the use of steel-frame construction. [2] Before this innovation, buildings relied on thick, load-bearing masonry walls, which severely limited their height. [3] By replacing heavy stone with a lightweight steel grid, architects could build much taller structures while maximizing interior space and window area. [4] Chicago's population grew rapidly during this era, driving demand for dense commercial real estate. [5] Consequently, this engineering breakthrough laid the foundation for the modern skyscraper and transformed city skylines across the globe.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 4 from the passage. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it interrupts the technical explanation of steel-frame technology with details about population and real estate demand.

Answer

The sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the technical explanation of steel-frame technology with details about population and real estate demand.
The correct option is the one stating that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the technical explanation of steel-frame technology. The main idea of the paragraph is the development and engineering impact of steel-frame construction. Sentence 4 introduces demographic and economic information that is tangential to this technological focus. Furthermore, deleting Sentence 4 allows the phrase 'this engineering breakthrough' in Sentence 5 to refer back directly and cohesively to the 'lightweight steel grid' described in Sentence 3.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on the engineering transition from masonry walls to steel-frame construction and its physical impact on building design.
Establishing the paragraph's primary focus is essential for determining if a sentence is relevant or tangential.
2
Evaluate the role and relevance of Sentence 4.
Sentence 4 introduces demographic information (population growth) and economic factors (real estate demand), which are distinct from the technical and structural details discussed in the surrounding sentences.
This step determines whether the sentence contributes to or departs from the established focus.
3
Examine the cohesion and flow of the paragraph with and without Sentence 4.
Keeping Sentence 4 interrupts the transition between the lightweight steel grid in Sentence 3 and the phrase 'this engineering breakthrough' in Sentence 5. Deleting it restores the direct connection.
Assessing transitions ensures that the paragraph flows logically and maintains cohesion.

Key Concept

Evaluating whether a sentence should be added or deleted based on paragraph unity, focus, and structural cohesion.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 19Question

[1] In 1959, Soviet geneticist Dmitry Belyaev began a decades-long experiment to understand how wild animals become domesticated. [2] He hypothesized that selecting animals solely for their tameness would trigger a cascade of physical and behavioral changes over generations. [3] To test this, Belyaev bred silver foxes, selecting only those that showed the least fear and aggression toward humans. [4] Over several generations, the foxes not only became friendly like domestic dogs but also developed floppy ears, spotted coats, and wagging tails. [5] Silver foxes are a color variant of the red fox, *Vulpes vulpes*.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 5 from the paragraph. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's discussion of the experiment's methodology and results with an irrelevant taxonomic detail.

Answer

Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's discussion of the experiment's methodology and results with an irrelevant taxonomic detail.
The sentence should be deleted because the paragraph focuses on Dmitry Belyaev's evolutionary experiment on animal domestication, specifically how he bred silver foxes to select for tameness and the physical traits that resulted. Stating that silver foxes are a color variant of the red fox (*Vulpes vulpes*) is an irrelevant taxonomic detail that interrupts the narrative flow of the experiment's methodology and results.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes Dmitry Belyaev's 1959 experiment on fox domestication, outlining the hypothesis (selecting for tameness), the methodology (breeding based on friendliness), and the outcomes (dog-like physical and behavioral traits).
Establishing the paragraph's core topic helps determine whether the sentence under consideration contributes to or disrupts that topic.
2
Evaluate the content and function of the proposed sentence (Sentence 5).
Sentence 5 states that silver foxes are a color variant of the red fox, *Vulpes vulpes*.
Analyzing the sentence's content allows us to compare it to the overall topic of the paragraph.
3
Determine whether the sentence should be kept or deleted, and identify the correct justification.
The sentence provides an irrelevant taxonomic detail that does not contribute to the description of the domestication experiment. Therefore, it should be deleted because it interrupts the flow. The correct option is the one stating it should be deleted because it interrupts the discussion with an irrelevant taxonomic detail.
This step aligns the decision (deletion) with the text-dependent justification.

Key Concept

Sentence Addition and Deletion Decisions
Question 20Question

[1] Located on the remote Norwegian island of Spitsbergen, the Svalbard Global Seed Vault serves as a secure backup for the world's crop diversity. [2] The facility is built deep inside a sandstone mountain, where permafrost and thick rock ensure that the seed samples remain frozen even without electricity. [3] This isolated location offers excellent protection against political conflicts, natural disasters, and system failures. [4] Interestingly, Spitsbergen is also home to a thriving population of polar bears, which are well-adapted to the harsh Arctic climate. [5] By storing duplicates of seeds from genebanks worldwide, the vault plays a crucial role in safeguarding global food security against future agricultural crises.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 4 from the passage. Should the writer make this deletion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because the sentence interrupts the paragraph's focus on the security and function of the seed vault by introducing irrelevant information about local wildlife.

Answer

Yes, because the sentence interrupts the paragraph's focus on the security and function of the seed vault by introducing irrelevant information about local wildlife.
The correct answer is the option stating that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the security and function of the seed vault by introducing irrelevant information about local wildlife. The main focus of the paragraph is the secure storage of crop diversity, and details about polar bear populations are off-topic and disrupt the unity of the passage.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph explains the location, physical security, and global importance of the Svalbard Global Seed Vault.
Understanding the main idea is essential for determining if a specific sentence belongs in the text.
2
Analyze the function of Sentence 4 within the paragraph.
Sentence 4 describes the presence of polar bears on the island of Spitsbergen.
This step determines whether the sentence supports, transitions, or distracts from the main topic.
3
Evaluate the relevance of the polar bear detail to the seed vault's security and purpose.
The detail about polar bears is tangential and does not support the discussion of crop diversity, physical fortification, or global food security.
Identifying that the sentence is irrelevant leads to the conclusion that it should be deleted.

Key Concept

Evaluating the relevance of a sentence to the main focus of a paragraph to determine whether it should be added or deleted.
Page 1 / 2Next
Sentence Addition and Deletion Decisions Practice Questions — ACT | Examkin