Question

Difficulty: Very hardIdentifying Sources of Error and Confounding Variables

A student group designed four different scientific experiments but realized that each procedure contained a critical confounding variable or source of error that could compromise the validity of the results.

Match each experimental procedure on the left with its primary confounding variable or source of error on the right.

  • To measure amylase activity at different pH levels, a student mixes amylase dissolved in pH buffers with a starch substrate dissolved in unbuffered distilled water.Dilution of the buffer system by the unbuffered substrate solution, shifting the reaction mixture's actual pH away from the targeted buffer levels.
  • To determine the specific heat capacity of a metal alloy, a heated sample is transferred from a boiling water bath at 100.0C100.0^\circ\text{C} to a calorimeter containing water at 20.0C20.0^\circ\text{C} using metal tongs kept at 20.0C20.0^\circ\text{C}.An uncontrolled thermal gradient where the transfer tool acts as a heat sink, lowering the initial temperature of the sample before calorimetric measurement begins.
  • To compare photosynthetic rates at different light intensities, glass chambers containing plants are placed at varying distances from a high-intensity incandescent light source without temperature regulation.Confounding of the independent variable with thermal energy, as changing the distance to the light source simultaneously alters both light intensity and chamber temperature.
  • To measure diurnal ground-level ozone concentrations, a UV absorption sensor detecting attenuation of 254 nm254\text{ nm} light is placed next to a busy highway intersection with fluctuating traffic.Fluctuations in light-scattering particulates and co-pollutants that absorb the same wavelength, leading to an overestimation of the target gas concentration during peak traffic hours.

Answer

Amylase activity matches with buffer dilution; Specific heat capacity matches with thermal gradient transfer tool; Photosynthesis rate matches with thermal energy from the light source; Ozone concentration matches with UV-absorbing particulate and gas interference.
The correct pairings successfully match each experimental flaw to its specific confounding factor or error source. Mixing unbuffered substrate with buffered enzyme shifts the target pH. Using room-temperature tongs transfers heat away from the hot metal alloy. Incandescent light sources introduce heat along with light, altering temperatures at different distances. Highway traffic introduces particulate matter and gases that absorb 254 nm254\text{ nm} UV light, interfering with ozone detection.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the amylase experiment.
Identified that mixing buffered enzyme with unbuffered substrate changes the concentrations and shifts the intended pH values.
Buffers resist changes in pH only within limits; adding a substantial volume of unbuffered solution alters the ionic equilibrium.
2
Analyze the calorimetry experiment.
Identified that room-temperature tongs contact a 100.0C100.0^\circ\text{C} sample, causing heat conduction.
Heat naturally flows from the hot alloy to the cooler tongs, decreasing the alloy's temperature before it is submerged in the calorimeter.
3
Analyze the photosynthesis experiment.
Identified that incandescent bulbs radiate thermal energy alongside light.
Changing the distance to the bulb alters two variables simultaneously (light intensity and chamber temperature), confounding the study of light intensity alone.
4
Analyze the ozone sensor experiment.
Identified that vehicle emissions contain multiple species that interact with 254 nm254\text{ nm} light.
Soot particles scatter light and combustion products like NO2NO_2 absorb near the same wavelength, introducing non-ozone interference that leads to false high readings.

Key Concept

Identifying confounding variables and uncontrolled factors in experimental procedures
Estimated Time:3m 0s
Rate this question