For decades, scholars of Maya hieroglyphs viewed the inscriptions as purely mystical, representing astronomical calendars and religious symbols rather than historical records. This perspective shifted in 1960 when art historian Tatiana Proskouriakoff published a groundbreaking study of the stelae—carved stone slabs—at the site of Piedras Negras. By arranging the monuments chronologically based on their carved dates, she noticed that the life spans of the figures depicted corresponded to average human lifespans, suggesting the carvings actually recorded the histories of rulers.
The writer wants to conclude the paragraph by reinforcing the impact of Proskouriakoff’s discovery on the scholarly understanding of Maya writing. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?
- AConsequently, her work at Piedras Negras also inspired her to sketch reconstructions of ancient temples, which she published in a book on Maya architecture.
- Ultimately, her findings proved that the glyphs were a historical writing system, permanently altering how researchers interpret Maya texts.Answer
- CNevertheless, her discoveries demonstrated that the glyphs recorded actual history, this breakthrough discredited the long-standing belief that the writing was purely symbolic.
- DFor instance, the breakthrough, that she achieved, allowed other scholars to read the detailed histories of ancient Maya dynasties.