A student conducted an experiment to determine how the concentration of a sodium chloride () solution affects the rate of rust formation on iron nails. The student prepared beakers with different concentrations, placed identical iron nail in each beaker, and positioned the beakers at various locations in the laboratory. The experimental setup is summarized in the table below:
| Beaker | Concentration (\%) | Volume of Solution (mL) | Location in Laboratory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next to a sunny window | |||
| Inside a closed wooden cabinet | |||
| Directly above a heating vent | |||
| On an open laboratory bench |
After days, the student measured the mass of rust that had accumulated on each nail. Which of the following factors represents an uncontrolled variable in this experiment that could confound the results?
- AThe mass of rust accumulated on each nail after days
- The location of each beaker in the laboratoryAnswer
- CThe concentration of sodium chloride () in the solutions
- DThe volume of the salt solution in each beaker
Answer
The location of each beaker in the laboratory
The correct answer is the location of each beaker in the laboratory. In a controlled experiment, only the independent variable (in this case, the sodium chloride concentration) should be changed between groups. By placing the beakers in different locations, the student introduced additional variables such as temperature and light intensity, which can also affect the rate of rust formation. This makes it impossible to determine if any difference in rust mass was caused by the salt concentration or the environmental conditions of the location.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Identifying confounding variables (uncontrolled factors that vary across experimental groups) and understanding how they compromise the validity of experimental conclusions.