The following passage is adapted from an article on the history of oceanography.
Paragraph 1
In the mid-nineteenth century, the prevailing scientific consensus regarding the deep ocean was dominated by the 'azoic hypothesis.' Proposed by naturalist Edward Forbes, this theory asserted that marine life could not exist below approximately 300 fathoms (about 1,800 feet) due to the extreme pressure, near-freezing temperatures, and total absence of sunlight. Forbes's conclusion was widely accepted, establishing a conceptual boundary that restricted the focus of marine biology primarily to coastal and shallow waters.
Paragraph 2
This boundary was shattered by the HMS Challenger expedition (1872–1876). Equipping a wooden corvette with miles of dredging rope, scientists systematically sampled the ocean floor at depths exceeding 20,000 feet. To the scientific community's astonishment, the dredges retrieved a diverse array of specialized organisms. However, while these discoveries disproved the azoic hypothesis, they did not fundamentally challenge the understood rules of ecology: these deep-sea creatures still depended on 'marine snow'—organic debris drifting down from photosynthetic organisms near the sunlit surface.
Paragraph 3
A far more radical paradigm shift occurred in 1977 with the voyage of the submersible Alvin to the Galapagos Rift. Scientists discovered thriving ecosystems clustered around hydrothermal vents, which spewed superheated, mineral-rich water. Unlike the organisms discovered by the Challenger expedition, these vent communities did not rely on the sun. Instead, primary production was driven by chemosynthetic bacteria that converted toxic hydrogen sulfide into organic energy. This discovery established that complex life could thrive entirely independent of solar energy, expanding our understanding of the conditions necessary for life to exist.
Which of the following best describes the relationship between Paragraph 3 and Paragraph 2?
- AParagraph 3 refutes the empirical observations made by the Challenger expedition described in Paragraph 2.
- BParagraph 3 provides a detailed explanation of the technological advancements that enabled the expedition described in Paragraph 2.
- Paragraph 3 describes a discovery that represents a more fundamental departure from traditional ecological assumptions than the discoveries described in Paragraph 2.Answer
- DParagraph 3 summarizes the global environmental impact of the shallow-water ecosystems mentioned in Paragraph 2.