Question

The following passage is adapted from a Social Science essay on urban planning.

Paragraph 1
In the dense grid of modern metropolitan areas, urban planners have increasingly turned to the concept of 'pocket parks'—minuscule public spaces carved out of vacant lots, abandoned alleyways, or irregular street corners. Unlike traditional municipal parks, which require acres of land and substantial public funding, these micro-spaces are highly localized, often measuring no more than a fraction of an acre. Originating as a grassroots movement in the mid-twentieth century, pocket parks are designed to insert nature directly into the daily paths of city residents, offering immediate access to greenery in neighborhoods where large-scale parks are structurally or financially impossible to construct.

Paragraph 2
While large municipal parks serve as weekend destinations that require deliberate travel, pocket parks function as spontaneous, everyday sanctuaries. A resident might pause for ten minutes on a bench under a single maple tree during a lunch break, or children might play on a single climbing structure on their way home from school. By catering to these brief, routine encounters, pocket parks foster a distinct form of micro-social interaction. They act as 'third places'—spaces outside of home and work—where neighbors who might otherwise never cross paths can engage in casual conversation, thereby strengthening the social fabric of a single block or neighborhood.

Based on the passage, which of the following best describes the relationship between Paragraph 2 and Paragraph 1?