For decades, Mayan hieroglyphs were widely believed by scholars to represent abstract astronomical calculations and mystical religious allegories, rather than records of historical events. This consensus began to crumble in 1960 when archaeologist Tatiana Proskouriakoff published a pioneering analysis of the stelae—carved stone slabs—at the site of Piedras Negras. Proskouriakoff observed that the stelae were erected in distinct chronological clusters, with the earliest monument in each group depicting a young figure accompanied by a glyph indicating an initial accession. By calculating the spans of time recorded on these monuments, which never exceeded a typical human lifespan, she deduced that the inscriptions did not track celestial cycles. Instead, she demonstrated that they documented the actual lifetimes, accessions, and military achievements of historical Maya rulers.
According to the passage, what did the earliest monument in each chronological cluster of stelae at Piedras Negras depict or signify?
- AThe military triumphs achieved during a leader's youth
- A youthful subject and the beginning of a leader's reignAnswer
- CCelestial calculations aligned with a ruler's birth date
- DReligious allegories explaining the divine origin of a leader's power