Question

Difficulty: HardIdentifying Explicit Details

The following passage is adapted from an essay on the history of experimental low-temperature physics:

In April 1911, Dutch physicist Heike Kamerlingh Onnes and his research team at Leiden University conducted groundbreaking electrical resistance experiments on metals at cryogenic temperatures. Three years earlier, in 1908, Onnes had become the first scientist to liquefy helium, achieving a temperature of 4.2 K4.2\text{ K} (268.95C-268.95^\circ\text{C}). This breakthrough allowed his team to systematically investigate how electrical resistance behaved in conductors near absolute zero.

Initial theoretical opinions regarding electrical conductivity at ultra-low temperatures were sharply divided among early twentieth-century physicists. Lord Kelvin had hypothesized that as temperature decreased toward absolute zero, conduction electrons would freeze in place, causing electrical resistance to increase toward infinity. Conversely, Onnes originally conjectured that electrical resistance would steadily diminish and smoothly approach zero as thermal motion ceased.

To test these competing hypotheses, Onnes and his assistant Gilles Holst constructed a closed glass capillary tube containing purified mercury. Mercury was selected because it could be repeatedly distilled to eliminate chemical impurities that might distort resistance measurements. The capillary tube was submerged in a double-walled bath of liquid helium inside a vacuum-insulated cryostat. As the team systematically reduced the vapor pressure over the liquid helium bath to lower the temperature, Holst monitored the potential difference across the mercury capillary using a sensitive Wheatstone bridge.

At a temperature of approximately 4.20 K4.20\text{ K}, the electrical resistance of the mercury sample did not drop gradually as Onnes had anticipated. Instead, within a temperature interval of less than 0.01 K0.01\text{ K}, the resistance plummeted abruptly from 0.11 ohms0.11\text{ ohms} to less than one-hundred-thousandth of an ohm (105 ohms10^{-5}\text{ ohms}), falling below the detection threshold of their instruments. Initially suspecting a short circuit in the wiring connections outside the cryostat, Holst and Onnes spent hours inspecting the external terminal leads before confirming that the mercury had entered a novel state of zero resistance, which Onnes subsequently named 'superconductivity' in 1912.

According to the passage, why did Kamerlingh Onnes and his team specifically choose mercury for their low-temperature electrical resistance experiments?

  1. It could undergo repeated distillation to remove chemical impurities that might distort resistance readings.Answer
  2. B
    Its electrons were predicted by Lord Kelvin to remain mobile at temperatures close to absolute zero.
  3. C
    It maintained a stable liquid state inside the capillary tube without requiring a liquid helium cooling bath.
  4. D
    It exhibited a constant resistance of 0.11 ohms across all ambient room temperatures.

Answer

Mercury was chosen because it could undergo repeated distillation to eliminate chemical impurities that might distort resistance measurements.
The third paragraph explicitly states that mercury was selected because it could be repeatedly distilled to eliminate chemical impurities that might distort resistance measurements.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Locate the key term 'mercury' and the rationale for its selection in the text.
Found in Paragraph 3: 'Mercury was selected because it could be repeatedly distilled to eliminate chemical impurities that might distort resistance measurements.'
Direct literal lookup is required to identify explicit details.
2
Compare the located detail with the answer choices.
The option describing repeated distillation to remove chemical impurities matches the explicit text directly.
The correct answer in ACT literal comprehension items paraphrases or directly states stated facts.

Key Concept

Literal Comprehension - Identifying Explicit Details
Rate this question