Examkin

Question

Difficulty: EasyAnalyzing Counterarguments and Opposing Viewpoints

Wind turbines are increasingly recognized as a crucial weapon in the fight against climate change, providing clean, renewable energy that reduces our reliance on fossil fuels. However, some conservationists raise concerns about the impact of these large structures on local bird populations, pointing to collision-related deaths. While this impact is real, studies show that bird mortality from wind turbines is minuscule compared to deaths caused by domestic cats, buildings, and vehicle collisions. Furthermore, the threat that global warming poses to entire bird species and their habitats far outweighs the localized risk of turbine collisions. Thus, the expansion of wind energy remains essential for long-term ecological preservation.

In the passage, the author references the concern about wind turbine collisions causing bird deaths. What is the primary purpose of introducing this opposing viewpoint?

  1. A
    prove that wind energy projects must be halted immediately due to their negative environmental impact
  2. concede a valid environmental concern associated with wind turbines before explaining why the overall threat of climate change to birds is more severeAnswer
  3. C
    assert that domestic cats and buildings pose a far greater threat to birds than wind turbines do
  4. D
    suggest that global warming has had no measurable impact on bird populations compared to turbine collisions

Answer

concede a valid environmental concern associated with wind turbines before explaining why the overall threat of climate change to birds is more severe
The author introduces the concern about bird deaths to acknowledge a potential downside of wind turbines (concession), but then argues that the benefits of mitigating climate change outweigh this localized risk (rebuttal). This shows that the purpose of mentioning the counterargument is to address it directly and demonstrate that the main thesis remains strong.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the opposing viewpoint presented in the passage.
The opposing viewpoint is that wind turbines cause collision-related deaths to local bird populations.
This establishes the specific counterargument the question is asking about.
2
Analyze how the author responds to this opposing viewpoint.
The author concedes the impact is real but immediately rebuts it by comparing turbine-related bird deaths to other causes and explaining that global warming is a much larger threat to bird populations.
Understanding the transition from concession to rebuttal reveals the author's rhetorical purpose.
3
Determine the overall function of this sequence in the context of the main argument.
By introducing and then minimizing the counterargument, the author strengthens the main claim that wind energy expansion is necessary.
This links the opposing viewpoint's introduction to the author's primary objective.

Key Concept

Analyzing Counterarguments and Opposing Viewpoints
Rate this question

Topics

Analyzing Counterarguments and Opposing Viewpoints

More questions from this topic