Art conservators restoring Renaissance frescoes have historically relied on chemical solvents and physical scraping, both of which risk stripping away delicate pigments. Recently, however, laser ablation has emerged as a revolutionary tool in art conservation. By emitting brief pulses of light at precise wavelengths, lasers can vaporize layers of soot and dirt without heating the underlying paint. Because different materials absorb light at distinct rates, the laser can be calibrated to target only the dark grime while reflecting harmlessly off the lighter mineral pigments of the fresco.
Therefore, this absorption process is self-limiting, it prevents accidental over-cleaning. Once the dark soot is removed, the laser no longer has any effect on the surface. Ultimately, this synthesis of physics and art history ensures that these fragile masterpieces are preserved with unprecedented accuracy, allowing them to endure for future generations.
Which choice provides the most logical and effective transition from the preceding paragraph?
- ANO CHANGE
- BIn contrast, this chemical reaction is self-limiting.
- Consequently, this optical selectivity makes the cleaning process self-limiting.Answer
- DOn the other hand, the laser's safety is self-limiting, and it will have prevented future damage.