The following is an excerpt from an essay about early Earth's climate.
[1]
In , astronomers Carl Sagan and George Mullen pointed out a puzzling contradiction that threatened our understanding of Earth's early history. According to standard astrophysical models, our sun was about percent dimmer during the Archean Eon, four billion years ago, than it is today. With so little solar energy reaching the planet, Earth should have been a frozen wasteland, completely locked in ice. Yet, geological evidence from that same period—such as water-worn pebbles and ancient sedimentary rocks—reveals that liquid water flowed abundantly across the surface, and primitive life was already thriving.
[2]
To resolve this paradox, researchers have proposed various atmospheric models. One prominent theory suggests that a dense greenhouse gas envelope, consisting of carbon dioxide and perhaps ammonia or methane, acted as a heavy blanket to trap what little heat the faint sun provided. Others argue that Earth's lower albedo, or reflectivity, allowed the surface to absorb more solar radiation than it does today. Understanding how Earth maintained its liquid oceans during this period is not just a historical curiosity; it also helps astronomers define the boundaries of habitable zones around distant stars.
Which choice provides the most effective transition from the first paragraph to the second paragraph and introduces the main topic of the second paragraph?
- AAlthough scientists wanted to resolve this paradox; they proposed various atmospheric models.
- To resolve this paradox, researchers have proposed various atmospheric models.Answer
- CAlthough many scientists were shocked by this contradiction and wanted to find a solution.
- DTo resolve this paradox, researchers proposed various atmospheric models, they study gases.