Question

Difficulty: MediumDistinguishing Claims from Evidence

For decades, paleoanthropologists debated whether Neanderthals were hyper-carnivorous apex predators or opportunistic omnivores whose diets included a significant amount of plant matter. Recent scientific advancements have provided clearer insights, allowing researchers to distinguish between speculative claims about Neanderthal foraging habits and empirical evidence. Studies analyzing the stable isotope ratios of nitrogen-15 in Neanderthal bone collagen consistently reveal high values, which directly mirror those of modern terrestrial carnivores like wolves. This chemical signature indicates that Neanderthals obtained the vast majority of their dietary protein from large herbivores. However, researchers analyzing microfossils trapped in fossilized dental calculus (plaque) from Neanderthal teeth have recovered starch grains and phytoliths from wild barley and tubers. Some of these plant microfossils exhibit structural alterations, such as gelatinized starch walls, that occur only when starch is cooked. While the isotope data establishes that meat was the primary protein source, the dental microfossils demonstrate that Neanderthals routinely harvested, prepared, and consumed cooked plants, refuting the claim of strict hyper-carnivory.

Based on the passage, which of the following correctly matches each claim regarding Neanderthal diets with the specific empirical evidence that supports or refutes it?

  • The claim that Neanderthals routinely harvested and cooked wild plantsRecovered starch grains and phytoliths with gelatinized walls found in fossilized dental calculus
  • The claim that Neanderthals obtained the vast majority of their dietary protein from large herbivoresElevated stable isotope ratios of nitrogen-15 in Neanderthal bone collagen
  • The historical claim that Neanderthals were strictly hyper-carnivorous apex predators who consumed no plantsRefuted by the recovery of wild barley and tuber microfossils from fossilized dental plaque

Answer

The claim that Neanderthals harvested and cooked plants matches the dental microfossils with gelatinized walls; the claim that they got protein from large herbivores matches the elevated nitrogen-15 isotopes in bone collagen; and the claim that they were strictly hyper-carnivorous is refuted by the wild barley and tuber microfossils.
The correct matches align each dietary claim with its specific supporting or refuting evidence as presented in the text: the claim about cooking and eating plants is supported by gelatinized starch grains from dental plaque; the protein source claim is supported by nitrogen-15 collagen levels; and the hyper-carnivory claim is refuted by the plant microfossil remains.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the claims made in the passage regarding Neanderthal diets.
The claims are that Neanderthals routinely harvested and cooked plants, that they got protein from large herbivores, and the older claim that they were strict carnivores.
This establishes the targets for finding matching empirical evidence.
2
Locate the scientific evidence corresponding to the cooking and harvesting of plants.
The passage states that dental calculus contained starch grains and phytoliths of wild barley and tubers, with gelatinized walls indicating cooking.
This links the claim of plant preparation to the specific microfossil evidence.
3
Locate the scientific evidence corresponding to protein sources.
The nitrogen-15 stable isotope ratios in bone collagen mirror those of terrestrial carnivores, indicating protein came from large herbivores.
This connects the dietary protein claim to the isotopic evidence.
4
Locate the evidence that refutes the claim of strict hyper-carnivory.
The presence of plant microfossils (barley and tubers) in dental plaque directly refutes the claim that they ate only meat.
This completes the final matching pair.

Key Concept

Distinguishing Claims from Evidence
Rate this question