Question

Difficulty: MediumIdentifying Explicit Details

Read the passage below:

In October 1947, oceanographer Maurice Ewing led a scientific expedition aboard the research vessel Atlantis to investigate the geological structure of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Utilizing seismic refraction techniques—a methodology measuring the propagation speed of sound waves through subsurface rock layers—Ewing's team recorded acoustic data across vast stretches of the Atlantic Ocean floor. The resulting data revealed two unexpected physical findings. First, the sediment layer resting atop the oceanic basement rock was surprisingly sparse, measuring under one thousand feet deep in most survey sites rather than the multi-mile depth predicted by contemporary oceanographic models. Second, the underlying basaltic oceanic crust was extraordinarily thin, averaging approximately five kilometers in thickness compared to the thirty-to-forty-kilometer thickness characteristic of continental landmasses. Furthermore, rock cores retrieved directly from the central rift valley yielded fresh basalt completely devoid of accumulated sediment encrustations, providing direct physical evidence that the seafloor along the central ridge crest was geologically young.

Based on the passage, evaluate the following statement:
Seismic refraction measurements recorded during the 1947 Atlantis expedition demonstrated that the basaltic oceanic crust was thicker than the Earth's continental crust.

Answer: Answer

Answer

The statement is False. The passage explicitly states that the oceanic crust averaged approximately five kilometers in thickness, whereas continental crust measures thirty to forty kilometers in thickness.
The passage explicitly directly states that the oceanic crust averaged approximately five kilometers in thickness, which is significantly thinner than the thirty-to-forty-kilometer thickness of continental landmasses. Therefore, the assertion that the oceanic crust was thicker is factually contradicted by the text.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Locate the explicit discussion of crustal thickness in the passage.
The text explicitly mentions that the basaltic oceanic crust averaged approximately five kilometers in thickness.
Identifying explicit details requires pinpointing the precise sentence in the text that mentions the target measurement.
2
Compare the stated measurement of oceanic crust with the stated measurement of continental crust.
The oceanic crust is stated as five kilometers thick, while continental landmasses are stated as thirty to forty kilometers thick.
Evaluating the statement requires checking whether five kilometers is greater or less than thirty to forty kilometers.
3
Determine the truth value of the statement.
Since five kilometers is thinner than thirty to forty kilometers, the assertion that oceanic crust was thicker than continental crust is false.
Direct textual evidence directly contradicts the claim in the statement.

Key Concept

Identifying explicitly stated measurements and comparative facts in a passage.
Rate this question