Question

Difficulty: MediumDistinguishing Claims from Evidence

Based on the passage below, match each of the claims regarding the function of zebra stripes with its corresponding evidence or status of support.

Passage

For decades, biologists hypothesized that the zebra’s bold black-and-white stripes functioned primarily as a cooling mechanism, generating micro-currents of air across the animal's skin. However, recent empirical studies have challenged this thermoregulation claim. Researchers led by Dr. Alison Cobb measured the skin temperatures of wild zebras and found no significant difference in cooling efficiency compared to uniform-colored herbivores in the same environment. Instead, experimental evidence increasingly supports the hypothesis that stripes serve to deter biting flies. In controlled field tests, scientists covered horse models with various patterned rugs. They observed that tabanid flies (horseflies) attempted to land on striped surfaces far less frequently than on solid-colored ones. High-speed video analysis revealed that the flies failed to decelerate properly when approaching stripes, suggesting that the pattern disrupts their visual processing during landing. While some researchers still argue that stripes may also disrupt predator tracking by creating a motion dazzle effect, the physical deterrence of disease-carrying insects stands as the claim with the most robust experimental backing to date.

  • The claim that zebra stripes function as a cooling system (thermoregulation)Empirical measurements showing no difference in skin temperatures compared to solid-colored herbivores
  • The claim that zebra stripes deter biting flies by disrupting landingHigh-speed video evidence of tabanid flies failing to decelerate properly when approaching stripes
  • The claim that zebra stripes protect against predators through a motion dazzle effectAn active area of scientific speculation that currently lacks robust experimental backing

Answer

Thermoregulation matches with skin temperature measurements; fly deterrence matches with high-speed video of flies failing to decelerate; and predator protection matches with lack of robust experimental backing.
Each claim is correctly matched with its specific evidence or support status: the cooling hypothesis is paired with wild zebra skin temperature measurements; the fly deterrence claim is paired with video evidence of fly landing failures; and the predator defense hypothesis is paired with the note that it lacks robust backing.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the claim regarding thermoregulation and locate the corresponding evidence in the text.
The text states that researchers measured wild zebras' skin temperatures and found no difference from uniform-colored herbivores, which directly addresses the cooling/thermoregulation claim.
To connect the claim about cooling to its specific empirical test.
2
Identify the claim regarding fly deterrence and locate the corresponding evidence in the text.
The text details controlled tests with horse models and high-speed video analysis showing tabanid flies failing to decelerate properly when approaching stripes.
To connect the insect deterrence claim to its supporting observational and video evidence.
3
Identify the claim regarding predator defense and determine its status in the passage.
The text describes the predator tracking (motion dazzle) claim as a continuing argument but explicitly notes that the physical deterrence of insects has the most robust experimental backing, leaving the motion dazzle claim as currently lacking such robust support.
To distinguish a hypothesis with limited evidence from those with active empirical support.

Key Concept

Distinguishing Claims from Evidence
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question