All practice questions

5556 questions

Question 541Question

The following sentences, when ordered logically, form a paragraph about desert plant adaptations. Arrange the sentences so that the general claim about water conservation is logically followed by specific supporting evidence and details.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct order begins with the general claim about desert plant features, followed by the specific evidence of the saguaro cactus's pleated stem, and concludes with the detail explaining how this adaptation supports survival.
The paragraph is logically organized starting with the general claim about desert plant adaptations, followed by the specific evidence of the saguaro cactus's pleated stem (introduced by 'For instance'), and ending with the explanation of how this adaptation helps the plant survive.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the central claim of the paragraph.
The sentence stating that many desert plants have developed remarkable physical features to conserve water serves as the general claim.
Paragraphs typically begin with a broad assertion or topic sentence that establishes the main idea before presenting specific details.
2
Locate the specific evidence that supports the claim.
The sentence describing the saguaro cactus's pleated stem is the evidence.
The transition 'For instance' directly signals that this sentence is a concrete example supporting the general claim about physical features.
3
Find the concluding explanation or detail that elaborates on the evidence.
The sentence beginning with 'This anatomical adaptation' is the final detail.
The phrase 'This anatomical adaptation' refers back to the 'pleated stem' mentioned in the evidence sentence, explaining the survival benefit of that feature and bringing the paragraph to a logical conclusion.

Key Concept

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 542Question

Identify the single punctuation mark that must be inserted in the blank to correctly join the two independent clauses without using a coordinating conjunction.

Fill in the blanks below

The jazz band played an energetic set at the local cafe the audience showed their appreciation with a standing ovation.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

A semicolon (;) is the correct punctuation mark to join the two independent clauses.
A semicolon is the correct punctuation mark because it is used to connect two closely related independent clauses that are not joined by a coordinating conjunction.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the clause before the blank.
The clause 'The jazz band played an energetic set at the local cafe' contains a subject and a verb and expresses a complete thought, making it an independent clause.
To determine correct punctuation, we must identify if the clauses are independent or dependent.
2
Analyze the clause after the blank.
The clause 'the audience showed their appreciation with a standing ovation' also contains a subject and a verb and expresses a complete thought, making it a second independent clause.
Identifying the structure of both parts of the sentence determines how they can be joined.
3
Choose the punctuation mark that links two independent clauses without a coordinating conjunction.
A semicolon must be used.
Two independent clauses cannot be joined by a comma alone (which creates a comma splice) and require a semicolon when no coordinating conjunction is present.

Key Concept

Semicolons
Question 543Question

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that highlights the construction timeline and key structural features of the Empire State Building. Based on the provided essay, is the statement that the essay successfully fulfills this goal true or false?

[1] The Empire State Building, completed in 1931, stands as a monument to early twentieth-century engineering. Rising 1,250 feet above the streets of Midtown Manhattan, it was constructed in just thirteen months during the Great Depression. The building’s framework consists of a massive steel grid designed to withstand high winds and support the limestone cladding that covers its exterior.

[2] At the core of this engineering marvel was the innovative use of hot-riveted steel columns. Workers, known as "sky boys," balanced on narrow beams hundreds of feet in the air to assemble the frame. They heated steel rivets in small furnaces until red-hot, tossed them across open gaps to catchers, and hammered them into place to secure the joints. This dangerous and fast-paced labor allowed the steel skeleton to rise at an astonishing rate of four and a half stories per week.

[3] While newer skyscrapers utilize concrete cores and composite materials, the Empire State Building remains a symbol of the steel-frame era. Today, it continues to serve as an active office building and a world-famous tourist attraction, demonstrating the enduring strength and utility of its original structural design.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: True

Answer

True
The essay successfully achieves the stated goal because it addresses both parts of the prompt's writing objective. It details the construction timeline (mentioning the thirteen-month duration and the rate of four and a half stories per week) and outlines structural components (including the steel grid, hot-riveted columns, and limestone cladding).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the essay-wide goal specified in the prompt, which is to highlight the construction timeline and key structural features of the Empire State Building.
The goal requires the text to address both when/how fast it was built (timeline) and its physical building properties (structural features).
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the essay.
2
Read the essay to see if it covers the construction timeline.
The essay mentions the building was constructed in 'just thirteen months' and that the skeleton rose at a rate of 'four and a half stories per week.'
This confirms the timeline aspect of the goal is met.
3
Read the essay to see if it covers key structural features.
The essay describes the 'massive steel grid,' the 'hot-riveted steel columns,' and the 'limestone cladding.'
This confirms the structural features aspect of the goal is met.

Key Concept

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Question 544Question

Complete the passage by typing the correct words in the blanks. Ensure you choose the correct word from commonly confused pairs based on the context of the sentence.

Fill in the blanks below

Although the research committee was not to incorporating unconventional methodologies, they insisted that the experimental trials remain from the primary clinical studies to avoid confounding the data.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

The first blank must be filled with 'averse' and the second blank must be filled with 'discrete'.
The correct words are 'averse' and 'discrete'. 'Averse' properly expresses the committee's lack of opposition to the methodologies. 'Discrete' correctly states that the trials must remain separate and distinct from the main studies.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the correct word for the first blank to express the committee's lack of opposition to the unconventional methodologies.
The word is 'averse' (meaning reluctant or opposed).
This distinguishes it from 'adverse', which means harmful or unfavorable.
2
Identify the correct word for the second blank to denote that the trials must remain separate and distinct from the main studies.
The word is 'discrete' (meaning separate or distinct).
This distinguishes it from 'discreet', which means cautious or secretive.

Key Concept

Identifying correct usage within frequently confused word pairs (adverse/averse and discrete/discreet) based on grammatical and semantic context.
Question 545Question

The following sentences are from a draft of an essay about the Venus flytrap. To ensure that the paragraph's claim is logically supported by evidence in a step-by-step manner, what is the most logical order for these sentences?

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The most logical order is: first the introduction of the counting mechanism, followed by the description of the initial trap closure, then the subsequent stimulation for digestion, and finally the explanation of how this multi-stage requirement prevents resource waste.
The correct order follows a clear logical and chronological path. It begins with the general claim that the plant uses a counting mechanism to conserve energy. It then explains the first stage of this mechanism (the two touches needed for closure) followed by the second stage (the subsequent touches needed for digestion). Finally, it concludes by explaining how this multi-stage system supports the central claim of resource conservation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main claim of the paragraph.
The sentence introducing the Venus flytrap's counting mechanism to prevent energy waste sets the stage as the topic sentence.
A logical paragraph must begin by stating the central claim before providing supporting evidence.
2
Arrange the evidence chronologically or sequentially.
The sentence describing the first two touches required for closure must precede the sentence describing the three additional touches required for digestion.
The trap must close before digestion can begin, making the physical sequence of events the logical order.
3
Place the concluding summary sentence.
The sentence clarifying the benefit of multiple signals at 'each stage' is placed at the end.
This sentence refers back to the stages described in the previous sentences and concludes the paragraph by reinforcing the main claim of resource conservation.

Key Concept

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 546Question

Passage:

[1] In 1925, at the age of fifty-five, Ynes Mexia embarked on her first botanical expedition to Mexico, beginning a career in which she would collect nearly 150,000 plant specimens. [2] Throughout her travels, she faced numerous hazards, including narrow paths, earthquakes, and wild animals. [3] Despite these challenges, Mexia was incredibly successful at discovering new plant species. [4] Her dedication to botany was evident in the way she meticulously prepared and documented her findings for research institutions.

The writer wants to revise Sentence 3 (reproduced below) to provide the most specific and concrete evidence of Mexia's success in discovering new plant species.

*Despite these challenges, Mexia was incredibly successful at discovering new plant species.*

Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: During these excursions, she discovered over five hundred new species of plants, including a new genus of the sunflower family named Mexianthus in her honor.

Answer

The option that specifies that during her excursions she discovered over five hundred new species of plants, including a new genus of the sunflower family named Mexianthus in her honor.
The correct option replaces a vague claim about success with specific, concrete details, stating that she discovered over five hundred new species and naming a specific new genus (Mexianthus). This directly supports the claim of her success in discovering new species with verifiable facts.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the target claim that needs to be supported with evidence.
The target claim is that Mexia was "incredibly successful at discovering new plant species."
This establishes the criterion for selecting the correct revision.
2
Evaluate the choices to find which one provides the most specific and concrete details showing new species discoveries.
The option referencing "over five hundred new species" and the genus "Mexianthus" provides numerical data and a specific name.
Specific details and data are stronger evidence than vague generalizations.
3
Check the incorrect options for grammatical errors or lack of relevance to the claim.
One option is a comma splice, another is a sentence fragment, and the third describes her travel distance rather than plant discoveries.
Eliminating options that are grammatically incorrect or fail to address the specific claim confirms the correct choice.

Key Concept

Supporting claims with specific, concrete evidence and details rather than vague statements, while maintaining grammatical correctness.
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 547Question

The Hubble Space Telescope , which was launched into orbit in 1990, has provided stunning images of deep space. Operating high above Earth's atmosphere, the telescope avoids the distorting effects of dust and gas. These clear views have helped scientists calculate the age of our universe.

Which of the following options represents the correct punctuation for the underlined portion of the passage?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

The option containing the relative clause 'which was launched into orbit in 1990' set off by a comma on both sides is correct.
The clause 'which was launched into orbit in 1990' is nonessential because it provides extra detail about 'The Hubble Space Telescope' without changing the core meaning of the sentence. Therefore, it must be enclosed by commas on both sides, which is correctly done in the original phrasing.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine if the underlined clause is essential or nonessential to the meaning of the sentence.
The clause is nonessential because the specific subject 'The Hubble Space Telescope' is already named.
Nonessential information must be set off with punctuation, whereas essential information should not be set off.
2
Identify the correct punctuation pattern to set off the nonessential clause.
A pair of commas (one before 'which' and one after '1990') correctly encloses the nonessential clause.
This avoids fragment errors from semicolons and keeps parenthetical punctuation complete.

Key Concept

Nonessential clauses must be enclosed by a pair of commas, whereas restrictive clauses must not have commas.
Question 548Question

In the passage below, a portion of one sentence is underlined.

Although many nineteenth-century scholars dismissed her work, Mary Anning made groundbreaking discoveries along the cliffs of Lyme Regis. The fossils she excavated helped reshape early geological theories. In particular, her discovery of the first complete plesiosaur skeleton which occurred in 1823 proved that the amateur fossil hunter, who worked alone, could outperform academic scholars.

Which choice best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: skeleton, which occurred in 1823, proved that the amateur fossil hunter who worked alone

Answer

The correct answer is the choice that sets off the nonessential clause 'which occurred in 1823' with commas and leaves the restrictive clause 'who worked alone' without punctuation.
The correct choice properly uses a pair of commas to enclose the nonessential relative clause 'which occurred in 1823' and correctly leaves the restrictive relative clause 'who worked alone' unpunctuated. Nonessential information requires surrounding commas to show it can be removed without altering the core meaning of the sentence, while restrictive information defines a specific referent and must remain integrated without commas.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the nonessential relative clause.
'which occurred in 1823' is identified as nonessential.
This clause adds descriptive details about the discovery of the skeleton but is not essential to identify the skeleton itself, meaning it must be enclosed by a pair of commas.
2
Identify the restrictive relative clause.
'who worked alone' is identified as restrictive.
This clause specifies which amateur fossil hunter is being referred to (only the ones who worked alone), making it essential to the sentence's meaning, so it must not have commas.
3
Eliminate incorrect punctuation options.
Choices with dangling commas, semicolons setting off dependent clauses, or commas around restrictive clauses are eliminated.
Semicolons cannot set off nonessential dependent clauses from an independent clause, and missing or misplaced commas violate standard punctuation conventions.

Key Concept

Distinguishing between nonessential elements (which require commas) and restrictive elements (which must not have commas).
Question 549Question

Passage

[1] Bioluminescent mushrooms, such as the *Panellus stipticus*, glow in the dark to attract nocturnal insects that disperse their spores. [2] This chemical reaction occurs when a substance called luciferin reacts with oxygen, catalyzed by the enzyme luciferase. [3] Under a dark forest canopy, these fungi emit a visible light. [4] The glow is bright enough that early travelers used them to mark trails.

Question
The writer wants to revise Sentence 3 to provide the most specific, concrete visual detail that illustrates the appearance of the mushroom's glow. Which of the following choices best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Under a dark forest canopy, these fungi emit a soft, neon-green radiance that illuminates the surrounding decaying wood.

Answer

The option that revises the sentence to state that the fungi emit a soft, neon-green radiance that illuminates the surrounding decaying wood.
The correct option provides concrete, sensory visual details such as 'soft, neon-green radiance' and 'surrounding decaying wood' to describe exactly how the glow appears, fulfilling the writer's goal.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the rhetorical goal requested by the prompt, which is to provide the most specific, concrete visual detail of the mushroom's glow.
The target is to find descriptive sensory details about the light's appearance.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the choices.
2
Evaluate the original sentence and the alternatives to determine which one offers descriptive visual language rather than general statements or explanations of causes.
The option describing a 'soft, neon-green radiance' on the 'decaying wood' provides the most specific visual detail, while other choices are either vague or explain the chemical process.
This filters out choices that do not meet the rhetorical goal.
3
Check the remaining options for grammatical correctness, ensuring that the selected sentence forms a complete independent clause.
The option beginning with 'Under a dark forest canopy, which...' is a fragment, leaving the choice with the correct independent clause structure as the only viable answer.
This ensures the revised sentence is grammatically correct.

Key Concept

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Question 550Question

During the expedition, the research team gathered various ice cores. The samples, which were collected from the Antarctic shelf contained ancient air bubbles that reveal details about the Earth's historic atmosphere. By analyzing these tiny pockets of gas, scientists can reconstruct past climates.

Which option most effectively corrects the punctuation of the underlined portion in the passage?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: samples, which were collected from the Antarctic shelf, contained

Answer

The correct option is the one that sets off the nonessential relative clause with a pair of commas: 'samples, which were collected from the Antarctic shelf, contained'.
The correct answer properly identifies that the relative clause describing the ice core samples is nonessential and therefore must be set off with a pair of commas. The punctuation correctly places a comma before the relative pronoun 'which' and a second comma after 'shelf' to close the parenthetical insertion before the main verb 'contained'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify whether the underlined clause is essential (restrictive) or nonessential (nonrestrictive) to the meaning of the sentence.
The clause 'which were collected from the Antarctic shelf' is nonessential because the sentence still identifies 'The samples' as the subject and makes sense without this additional descriptive detail.
Nonessential elements must be set off from the rest of the sentence with punctuation (usually commas), while essential elements should not have commas.
2
Select the option that correctly uses a pair of commas to enclose the nonessential relative clause.
The correct option uses a comma after 'samples' and a comma after 'shelf' before the verb 'contained'.
This maintains the grammatical flow and correctly punctuates the parenthetical information.

Key Concept

Commas with Nonessential and Parenthetical Elements
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 551Question

Passage

[1] In the early twentieth century, agricultural chemist George Washington Carver revolutionized Southern farming methods by promoting the cultivation of peanuts. [2] He argued that planting peanuts would restore nitrogen to soil depleted by decades of continuous cotton cultivation. [3] To convince skeptical farmers to adopt this new crop, Carver developed and publicized a wide variety of practical applications for the peanut. [4] His efforts successfully transformed the agricultural economy of the South.

Given that all the choices are true, which one provides the most specific and concrete examples of the peanut-based applications Carver developed?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: more than three hundred peanut-based products, including cooking oils, cosmetics, and wood stains.

Answer

The correct choice is the option that replaces the underlined text with 'more than three hundred peanut-based products, including cooking oils, cosmetics, and wood stains.'
The correct option provides specific, named examples of Carver's products (cooking oils, cosmetics, and wood stains), which directly satisfies the prompt's request for concrete details. It is also grammatically correct.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt's specific rhetorical goal.
The prompt requires selecting the choice that provides the most specific and concrete examples of the peanut-based applications Carver developed.
Identifying the target goal ensures that the chosen option directly answers the question rather than just being grammatically correct.
2
Evaluate the choices for specificity and concreteness.
The option listing 'cooking oils, cosmetics, and wood stains' provides clear, concrete examples, whereas the original phrasing and other choices remain vague or general.
Comparing details allows us to determine which choice contains the highest level of descriptive specificity.
3
Verify the grammatical correctness of the selected choice.
The option containing the specific examples integrates smoothly and grammatically into the sentence, whereas other choices introduce punctuation errors like comma splices or semicolon errors.
ACT English questions require that the correct rhetorical choice must also be grammatically correct.

Key Concept

Supporting claims with specific evidence and details
Question 552Question

An Accidental Invention

[1]
In 1945, self-taught engineer Percy Spencer was working at Raytheon, a company that manufactured magnetrons for radar systems. One day, while standing near an active radar transmitter, Spencer noticed something unusual in his pocket: a chocolate bar he was carrying had completely melted. Intrigued, he decided to investigate further by placing other food items, including popcorn kernels, near the machine. To his delight, they quickly popped.

[2]
Spencer realized that the microwave radiation from the magnetron could cook food much faster than traditional ovens, which relied on external heat. Raytheon patented the technology, and in 1947, the company introduced the first commercial microwave oven. This early model was massive, weighing nearly 750 pounds and standing almost six feet tall, making it impractical for home kitchens.

[3]
Over the next few decades, engineers worked to shrink the technology and reduce its cost. By the late 1960s, affordable countertop models became available, permanently transforming how people around the world prepare meals. Today, the microwave is a staple of modern convenience, all thanks to a melted chocolate bar.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that describes the accidental discovery of the microwave oven and its evolution into a common household appliance. The essay successfully achieves this goal.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: True

Answer

True, because the essay describes both the accidental discovery of the microwave and its transition into a household appliance.
The statement is correct because the essay details both the discovery (Spencer's melted chocolate bar in 1945) and the development of the technology into a consumer kitchen product.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the proposed writing goal from the prompt: describing the accidental discovery of the microwave and its transition to a household appliance.
The goal contains two requirements: detailing the discovery and detailing the evolution to consumer kitchens.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the passage.
2
Examine the passage to see if the accidental discovery is described.
The first paragraph describes Percy Spencer noticing a melted chocolate bar near a radar transmitter and testing it with popcorn, showing how the discovery was accidental.
This fulfills the first requirement of the proposed goal.
3
Examine the passage to see if the evolution into a household appliance is described.
The second and third paragraphs describe the progression from a massive 1947 commercial model to affordable countertop units in the late 1960s.
This fulfills the second requirement of the proposed goal, making the statement true.

Key Concept

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Question 553Question

During the international conference, the coordinators reviewed the progress of the research trials. Although the three partner laboratories worked independently, the scientists' consensus on it's efficacy was clear.

Which choice best represents the correct punctuation for the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: scientists' consensus on its

Answer

The correct phrasing is 'scientists' consensus on its', using the plural possessive 'scientists'' to indicate the collective consensus of multiple scientists and the possessive pronoun 'its' to modify 'efficacy'.
The context refers to 'three partner laboratories,' which implies there are multiple scientists involved. Therefore, the plural possessive 'scientists'' is required to show that the consensus belongs to all of them. Additionally, the sentence requires the possessive pronoun 'its' to modify the noun 'efficacy' (representing the efficacy of the trials), rather than the contraction 'it's' (it is).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the noun performing the possession and determine if it is singular or plural.
The sentence mentions 'three partner laboratories,' establishing that there are multiple scientists whose consensus is described. The plural possessive form is 'scientists''.
To correctly punctuate the possessive noun based on the surrounding context.
2
Identify whether a contraction or possessive pronoun is needed before the noun 'efficacy'.
The sentence describes the efficacy of the subject (the vaccine or treatment), so the possessive pronoun 'its' is correct. The contraction 'it's' (it is) would create a grammatical error.
To distinguish between homophones based on the grammatical requirements of the sentence.
3
Combine the correct plural possessive noun and the correct possessive pronoun.
The correct combination is 'scientists' consensus on its'.
To select the option that resolves both punctuation challenges correctly.

Key Concept

Possessive apostrophes for singular and plural nouns, and distinguishing possessive pronouns from contractions.
Question 554Question

The following passage is about Mary Anderson's invention of the windshield wiper.

[1]
During a winter trip to New York City in 1903, Mary Anderson noticed that streetcar drivers had to open their front windows or step outside to wipe sleet and snow off the windshields. This practice not only chilled the passengers but also slowed down transit times. Anderson began sketching a solution: a manual lever inside the vehicle that controlled a rubber blade on the outside of the window.

[2]
Upon returning to her home in Alabama, Anderson hired a designer to create a working model of her invention. She successfully patented her "window cleaning device" later that year. Although early car manufacturers did not immediately see the value of her invention, by the 1920s, windshield wipers had become standard equipment on most automobiles.

[3]
Today, Anderson is recognized as a pioneer of automotive safety. Her simple, mechanical invention solved a major transportation hazard and paved the way for modern driving convenience.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that describes how Mary Anderson came up with and developed the idea for the windshield wiper. Would this essay successfully fulfill that goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because it describes Anderson's initial observation in New York City and her subsequent steps to create and patent a working model.

Answer

Yes, because the essay describes Anderson's initial observation in New York City and her subsequent steps to create and patent a working model.
The essay successfully fulfills the goal because it details both how Anderson came up with the idea (observing streetcar drivers in New York City struggling to clear their windows) and how she developed it (sketching a design, hiring a builder, and obtaining a patent).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the hypothetical writing goal.
The goal is to describe how Mary Anderson came up with and developed the idea for the windshield wiper.
This establishes the criteria against which we evaluate the essay.
2
Analyze the essay content for alignment with the goal.
Paragraph 1 explains the origin of the idea (came up with), and Paragraph 2 details the steps taken to build a model and patent it (developed).
This determines if the essay contains the necessary information to fulfill the writing goal.
3
Select the correct option that matches the Yes/No direction and provides the accurate reason.
The essay does fulfill the goal (Yes), and the option stating it describes Anderson's initial observation and steps to create and patent a model is correct.
This connects the analytical conclusion to the correct answer choice.

Key Concept

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Question 555Question

The solar power plant, which generates clean energy for thousands of homes, has reached it's maximum capacity during the peak summer months.

Which of the following is the best replacement for the underlined portion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: its

Answer

its
The correct answer is the singular possessive pronoun 'its'. In the sentence, the pronoun modifies the noun 'capacity' to show possession by the singular subject 'the solar power plant'. Unlike possessive nouns, possessive pronouns (its, their, your, etc.) do not use apostrophes.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the word being tested and the context of the sentence.
The underlined word is 'it's', which modifies the noun phrase 'maximum capacity' belonging to the singular noun 'plant'.
Determining the relationship between the words helps identify whether a contraction or a possessive pronoun is required.
2
Determine the correct grammatical form required by the context.
Since 'it's' is a contraction of 'it is', substituting it into the sentence makes it ungrammatical ('reached it is maximum capacity'). Thus, a possessive form is required.
A possessive adjective must modify the noun 'capacity' to show ownership by the plant.
3
Select the correct spelling of the singular possessive pronoun.
The singular possessive pronoun is spelled 'its' without any apostrophe. The spelling 'its'' is incorrect, and 'it's' is a contraction.
Unlike possessive nouns, possessive pronouns do not use apostrophes to show ownership.

Key Concept

Distinction between the contraction 'it's' and the possessive pronoun 'its'
Estimated Time:40s
Question 556Question

While the space probe gathered invaluable data from Saturn's rings, the six flight directors' main concern was it's failing power source.

Which of the following options is the correct punctuation for the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: directors' main concern was its

Answer

The correct option is 'directors' main concern was its', which properly uses the plural possessive apostrophe for 'directors'' and the possessive pronoun 'its' for the space probe.
The correct answer is 'directors' main concern was its' because the sentence refers to the collective concern of 'six flight directors' (requiring the plural possessive noun 'directors'') and the power source of the space probe (requiring the possessive pronoun 'its').

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine if the noun 'directors' should be singular or plural, and possessive.
The context mentions 'six flight directors,' which is plural. To show possession of the 'main concern,' we add an apostrophe after the 's' to form 'directors''.
This correctly represents a plural possessive noun.
2
Determine whether the pronoun referring to the space probe's power source should be a possessive pronoun or a contraction.
We need the possessive pronoun 'its' to modify 'failing power source'. The contraction 'it's' (meaning 'it is') would be grammatically incorrect in this context.
The sentence refers to the power source belonging to the space probe.
3
Combine the correct choices to select the best option.
The correct combination is 'directors' main concern was its'.
This choice resolves both the plural possessive noun and the possessive pronoun rules correctly.

Key Concept

Apostrophes for Possessives and Contractions
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 557Question

While the two software developers worked late to patch the security flaw, the programmers' main concern was that the system would lose its users' trust.

Which of the following is the best version of the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

NO CHANGE
The correct option correctly uses the plural possessive apostrophe after the 's' in 'programmers' because the introductory clause references 'two software developers.' It also correctly uses the possessive pronoun 'its' to show that the trust belongs to the 'system,' whereas the contraction 'it's' (meaning 'it is' or 'it has') would be grammatically incorrect in this context.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine if the possessive noun 'programmers' should be singular or plural.
Since the sentence refers to 'the two software developers,' the noun must be plural possessive, which is written as 'programmers''.
The introductory clause establishes that there are two developers, so a plural possessive is required.
2
Determine whether the possessive pronoun 'its' or the contraction 'it's' is correct.
The word modifies 'users' trust' and represents ownership by the system, so the possessive pronoun 'its' is correct.
The contraction 'it's' stands for 'it is' or 'it has,' which does not make sense in the phrase 'the system would lose it is users' trust.'

Key Concept

Using apostrophes correctly for singular/plural possessive nouns and distinguishing between the possessive pronoun 'its' and the contraction 'it's'.
Question 558Question

The following five sentences are taken from a draft of an essay about cosmological discoveries. To construct a paragraph that logically develops the claim that the discovery of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation supported the Big Bang theory by systematically eliminating alternative explanations and aligning empirical data with theoretical predictions, in what order should the sentences be arranged?

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct sequence begins with the introduction of Penzias and Wilson's research and the unexpected noise (sentence_II), followed by the sentence describing the efforts to clean the antenna (sentence_IV), followed by the sentence stating that the noise persisted at 3.5 Kelvin (sentence_I), followed by the sentence linking this temperature to the Big Bang model (sentence_V), and ending with the sentence concluding that this evidence disproved the steady-state model (sentence_III).
The correct sequence begins with the sentence introducing Penzias and Wilson's research and the unexpected noise. It logically proceeds to the systematic efforts to eliminate local noise, followed by the observation that the noise persisted uniformly at a specific temperature. This temperature is then connected to the Big Bang theory's predictions, concluding with the historical impact of this evidence on cosmological models.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the introductory sentence that establishes the setting and the primary problem.
The sentence introducing the 1964 research by Penzias and Wilson and the unexpected background noise must come first to establish context.
A logical paragraph must define the subject and initial conflict before describing investigations or conclusions.
2
Trace pronoun and determinative references that follow the initial problem.
The sentence starting with 'To eliminate potential local sources of this persistent hiss' must follow, as 'this persistent hiss' refers directly back to the 'constant background noise' in the introduction.
This establishes the logical progression of the scientific method where researchers first try to rule out local interference.
3
Connect the outcome of the troubleshooting steps to the subsequent observation.
The sentence starting with 'Despite these efforts' must follow, as 'these efforts' refers directly to the cleaning and interference checks.
This sentence introduces the critical empirical observation that the noise remained isotropic at 3.5 Kelvin, which serves as the core evidence.
4
Link the empirical observation to the theoretical framework.
The sentence starting with 'This constant temperature' must follow the 3.5 Kelvin observation.
The phrase 'this constant temperature' relies on the prior mention of the 3.5 Kelvin value to make sense, connecting the data to the Big Bang theory's predictions.
5
Determine the concluding statement summarizing the impact of the evidence.
The sentence starting with 'By confirming this omnipresent radiation echo' must come last.
It functions as the rhetorical conclusion of the paragraph, explaining the historical impact of the evidence on the debate between the Big Bang and steady-state models.

Key Concept

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Question 559Question

In sentences containing a list of items that already include internal commas, semicolons are used to separate the main items to prevent confusion. Read the sentence below, and fill in the blanks with the correct punctuation mark to separate the items in this complex list.

Fill in the blanks below

The curation committee selected three distinct installations for the new exhibition: a massive sculpture composed of reclaimed industrial steel from Detroit, Michigan a series of delicate, monochromatic oil paintings from Oaxaca, Mexico and a room-sized, interactive light display from Kyoto, Japan.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

A semicolon (;) must be placed in both blanks to separate the items in the complex list.
The sentence features a complex list where the individual items already contain internal commas ('Detroit, Michigan', 'Oaxaca, Mexico', and 'Kyoto, Japan'). To avoid confusion and establish a clear hierarchy, semicolons must be used as 'super-commas' to separate the main items in the list. Thus, both blanks require a semicolon.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the structure of the sentence to identify the list items and their components.
The sentence lists three distinct art installations: a sculpture from Detroit, Michigan; oil paintings from Oaxaca, Mexico; and a light display from Kyoto, Japan.
Understanding the hierarchy of the list helps determine the appropriate level of punctuation needed to separate the items.
2
Check the individual list items for internal punctuation.
Each item contains its own internal comma separating the city name from the state or country ('Detroit, Michigan', 'Oaxaca, Mexico', and 'Kyoto, Japan').
If list items contain internal commas, standard commas cannot be used to separate the items themselves without creating visual and grammatical confusion.
3
Apply the 'super-comma' rule to separate the main elements of the list.
Replace the standard item separators with semicolons, placing one after 'Michigan' and another after 'Mexico'.
Semicolons act as stronger separators, grouping the city and state/country names together and clarifying where each individual list item ends and the next begins.

Key Concept

Using semicolons to separate items in a complex list containing internal punctuation.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 560Question

Read the sentence below. Which punctuation mark must fill the blank in order to correctly divide the elements of the complex list?

Fill in the blanks below

To complete their research, the botanists cataloged specimens from three distinct microclimates: the humid valley floor, where ferns and mosses thrived the arid rocky slopes, which supported drought-resistant shrubs; and the alpine zone, where only hardy lichens could survive.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

A semicolon (;)
A semicolon is the correct punctuation mark to fill the blank. In standard written English, when the items in a list contain their own internal punctuation (such as the commas introducing the relative clauses in this sentence), semicolons must be used to separate the main items in the list. This avoids confusion and clearly demarcates where one item ends and the next begins. The presence of a semicolon before the final conjunction and item ('; and the alpine zone') confirms that semicolons are the intended separators for this list.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the structure of the sentence and identify that it contains a list of items.
The sentence lists three distinct microclimates: 'the humid valley floor...', 'the arid rocky slopes...', and 'the alpine zone...'.
Understanding the overall sentence structure helps identify the relationship between the components.
2
Check the items in the list for internal punctuation.
Each list item contains an internal comma separating the noun phrase from an adjective clause (e.g., 'the humid valley floor, where ferns and mosses thrived').
If list items contain internal commas, standard punctuation rules require a stronger separator than a comma between the main items.
3
Examine the punctuation used elsewhere in the list to maintain consistency.
A semicolon is used to separate the second and third items ('; and the alpine zone').
Parallel list structure requires the same punctuation mark to separate the first and second items.
4
Determine the correct punctuation mark for the blank.
A semicolon must be placed in the blank.
Using a semicolon ensures the complex list is clearly organized and grammatically correct.

Key Concept

Using semicolons to separate items in a complex list when the items themselves contain internal punctuation.
PreviousPage 28 / 278Next
All practice questions — ACT | Examkin