All practice questions

5556 questions

Question 641Question

Hydrothermal vents on the ocean floor host thriving communities of organisms in complete darkness. Because these communities exist deep underwater, they cannot rely on photosynthesis for survival. Instead, chemosynthetic bacteria convert toxic chemicals from the vents into nutrients, forming the base of the food web. A variety of unique species [underlined portion].

Given the context of the passage, the writer wants to revise the underlined portion to provide the most specific, concrete detail that supports the claim that these species rely on the chemical energy produced by the bacteria. Which of the following choices best accomplishes this goal?

[underlined portion] = "cluster around these vents"

Show answer & explanation

Answer: nourish themselves by consuming the thick mats of bacteria covering the vent chimneys

Answer

nourish themselves by consuming the thick mats of bacteria covering the vent chimneys
The correct choice provides a specific, concrete detail showing exactly how the species depend on the chemical energy by consuming the bacterial mats.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the target claim that needs to be supported with evidence.
The prompt asks for a detail showing how the species rely on the chemical energy produced by the bacteria.
Understanding the specific rhetorical goal is necessary to evaluate which choice provides the correct type of supporting detail.
2
Evaluate the choices to find which one describes a concrete detail directly related to eating or using the bacteria's energy.
The option describing organisms consuming the bacterial mats directly illustrates this ecological dependency.
A concrete detail should be specific and relevant to the claim, rather than a generic or unrelated statement.

Key Concept

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 642Question

Before Alan Turing's famous work at Bletchley Park, a team of Polish mathematicians cracked the early military Enigma cipher. Marian Rejewski solved the mathematical equations underlying the machine's rotor permutations. The card catalog that Rejewski compiled during his research, which contained over 100,000 permutations, allowed the team to decrypt messages in minutes.

Which choice best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

The original phrasing, which leaves the restrictive clause unpunctuated and encloses the nonessential clause within commas, is correct.
The correct choice properly distinguishes between the restrictive clause 'that Rejewski compiled during his research' and the nonessential clause 'which contained over 100,000 permutations'. Because the 'that' clause is essential to defining the specific catalog, it requires no commas. The 'which' clause is nonessential, so it must be enclosed by a matched pair of commas—one before 'which' and one after 'permutations'—allowing the main subject 'The card catalog' to link to its verb 'allowed'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the clauses modifying the noun 'card catalog' and determine if they are essential (restrictive) or nonessential (nonrestrictive).
The clause 'that Rejewski compiled during his research' is restrictive because it specifies which catalog is being discussed. The clause 'which contained over 100,000 permutations' is nonessential because it provides additional, non-identifying detail about the catalog.
Understanding the semantic role of each clause dictates the correct punctuation rules to apply.
2
Apply the punctuation rules for restrictive and nonessential clauses.
Do not place commas around the restrictive clause starting with 'that'. Place a pair of commas around the nonessential relative clause starting with 'which' to set it off from the rest of the sentence.
Restrictive clauses are essential to the sentence's meaning and must not be separated from their referent, whereas nonessential elements must be set off by a matched pair of commas.
3
Evaluate the choices to ensure no punctuation marks are misplaced or create grammatical fragments.
The original punctuation maintains the integrity of both clauses and allows the subject 'The card catalog' to connect smoothly to the verb 'allowed'. Alternatives introduce errors such as dangling commas, separated restrictive clauses, or a semicolon that cuts off a dependent clause.
This guarantees that the sentence remains grammatically complete and clear.

Key Concept

Commas with Nonessential and Parenthetical Elements
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 643Question

[1] In the late 1920s, writer and anthropologist Zora Neale Hurston traveled throughout the American South to document African American oral traditions. [2] Hurston believed that folklore was not a static relic of the past but rather a dynamic, living art form that shaped community identity. [3] To capture the true vitality of these stories, she knew she had to record them in their natural settings rather than in academic isolation. [4] Her field research relied on immersive methods that allowed her to integrate fully into the daily lives of the people she studied.

The writer wants to revise Sentence 4 (reproduced above) to provide the most specific, concrete details that support the claim that Hurston integrated herself into the daily lives of the people she studied. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: She lived in turpentine camps, sang traditional songs with families on porch swings, and worked in Florida sawmills.

Answer

The option that describes living in turpentine camps, singing traditional songs on porch swings, and working in sawmills is the correct answer because it provides concrete details illustrating integration.
The correct choice provides specific, concrete details of integration (living in turpentine camps, singing on porch swings, working in sawmills) that directly substantiate the claim.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the claim to be supported.
The claim is that Hurston integrated herself fully into the daily lives of the people she studied.
The prompt asks to support this specific claim with concrete details.
2
Evaluate the choices for specificity and relevance.
The choice mentioning turpentine camps, porch swings, and sawmills provides the most concrete, specific details of daily life integration.
Specific details are more effective at supporting a claim than vague generalities.
3
Check for grammatical correctness.
The chosen option is grammatically correct, whereas other choices contain comma splices or semicolon errors.
ACT English questions require the correct rhetorical choice to also be grammatically correct.

Key Concept

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Question 644Question

Following a lengthy investigation into the misuse of campaign funds, the committee recommended that the chamber formally censor the representative for her actions.

Which option is the best replacement for the underlined word?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: censure

Answer

The word 'censure' is the correct choice because the context refers to formally reprimanding a public official for misconduct.
The word 'censure' means to express severe disapproval or formally reprimand someone, especially in a legislative or official setting. This matches the context of a committee recommending discipline for a representative's actions. The other options are homophones or near-homophones with entirely different meanings.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the context of the sentence to determine the intended meaning of the underlined word.
The sentence describes a committee recommending that a legislative chamber formally discipline or reprimand a representative for unethical behavior.
Identifying the contextual meaning helps narrow down the correct word choice among homophones.
2
Compare the definitions of the word choices (censor, censure, censer, sensor) to find the correct fit.
'Censure' means to express severe disapproval or formally reprimand, which matches the context. 'Censor' means to suppress objectionable content, 'censer' is a vessel for incense, and 'sensor' is a detection device.
Matching the correct definition to the context ensures the word choice is semantically accurate.

Key Concept

Distinguishing between frequently confused words (specifically homophones and near-homophones like censor and censure) based on sentence context.
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 645Question

Biologists studying the isolated Tepui tablelands of South America have observed a rare ecological phenomenon: evolutionary stasis, which is the preservation of ancestral traits over millions of years.

Which of the following options best replaces the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: phenomenon: evolutionary stasis, which is

Answer

phenomenon: evolutionary stasis, which is
The correct answer is the option that keeps the colon after 'phenomenon' because the preceding clause is independent, and the colon appropriately introduces the explanation of the phenomenon ('evolutionary stasis'). The comma after 'stasis' correctly introduces the nonessential relative clause.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine if the clause before the punctuation mark is independent.
The clause 'Biologists studying the isolated Tepui tablelands of South America have observed a rare ecological phenomenon' is independent because it contains a subject and a verb and can stand alone as a complete sentence.
Colons must be preceded by a complete independent clause.
2
Evaluate the structure of the phrase following the punctuation mark.
The phrase 'evolutionary stasis, which is the preservation...' is a noun phrase followed by a nonessential relative clause, meaning it is a dependent phrase.
This helps rule out punctuation marks like semicolons, which require independent clauses on both sides.
3
Apply grammar rules to test the punctuation choices.
A colon is appropriate here because it follows an independent clause and introduces an explanation. Using a semicolon creates a fragment, using a comma with 'this is' creates a comma splice, and putting the colon after 'that is' leaves the preceding clause incomplete.
To identify the only grammatically correct option.

Key Concept

A colon must be preceded by an independent clause and can be used to introduce an explanation, list, or clarification.

Alternative Method

Try reading the sentence up to the colon. If it cannot stand alone as a complete sentence, a colon cannot be used. If it can, verify that the following part explains or defines what came before.
Estimated Time:45s
Question 646Question

The sentence below contains a list of items that have internal commas. What punctuation mark should be placed in both blank spaces to clearly separate the items in this list?

Fill in the blanks below

The chef prepared three signature dishes for the tasting menu: a savory, slow-roasted duck breast a delicate, herb-infused wild mushroom tart and a rich, dark chocolate soufflé served with raspberry coulis.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

A semicolon (;) must be used in both blanks to separate the items in the complex list.
A semicolon is required in both blanks because the items in the list contain internal commas. When list items have their own internal punctuation, semicolons must be used as the outer separators to keep the list organized and clear.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the list of items being presented.
The sentence lists three distinct dishes: a duck breast, a wild mushroom tart, and a chocolate soufflé.
Understanding the structure of the list is necessary to determine the correct punctuation.
2
Examine the internal punctuation of each item in the list.
Each dish has coordinate adjectives separated by commas, such as 'savory, slow-roasted' and 'delicate, herb-infused'.
If list items contain internal commas, standard commas cannot be used to separate the items themselves without causing reader confusion.
3
Apply the rule for complex lists.
Use semicolons to separate the main items in the list.
Semicolons clearly mark the boundaries of each complex item, preventing a confusing or run-on list.

Key Concept

Using semicolons to separate items in a complex list containing internal punctuation.
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 647Question

Many masterpieces of modernist music premiered in Paris during the early twentieth century. The composition, that Stravinsky wrote for the Ballets Russes, which featured jarring rhythms and dissonant chords, provoked a riot at its premiere. Critics and audiences alike were unprepared for such avant-garde sounds.

Which of the following options most effectively punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: composition that Stravinsky wrote for the Ballets Russes, which featured jarring rhythms and dissonant chords,

Answer

The correct option is the one that does not place commas around the restrictive clause 'that Stravinsky wrote for the Ballets Russes' but correctly places a comma before and after the nonessential clause 'which featured jarring rhythms and dissonant chords'.
The correct option properly leaves the restrictive clause 'that Stravinsky wrote for the Ballets Russes' unpunctuated and encloses the nonessential relative clause 'which featured jarring rhythms and dissonant chords' with a pair of commas.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the restrictive and nonessential clauses in the sentence.
The clause 'that Stravinsky wrote for the Ballets Russes' is restrictive because it identifies the specific composition. The clause 'which featured jarring rhythms and dissonant chords' is nonessential because it adds extra description rather than defining the noun.
Restrictive clauses do not take commas, while nonessential clauses must be set off by commas.
2
Evaluate the punctuation around the restrictive clause.
Commas should not be placed around 'that Stravinsky wrote for the Ballets Russes'.
Separating a restrictive clause with commas incorrectly suggests the information is optional.
3
Evaluate the punctuation around the nonessential clause.
A comma must appear both before 'which' and after 'chords' to enclose the clause.
Omitting either comma in a parenthetical pair or using an incorrect punctuation mark like a semicolon violates standard conventions.

Key Concept

Commas with Nonessential and Parenthetical Elements
Estimated Time:45s
Question 648Question

Many tourists visit the Grand Canyon to see its famous red rock layers; others prefer to hike down to the Colorado River.

Which choice best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

The correct option is the one that keeps the semicolon to join the two independent clauses: 'layers; others'.
The original sentence contains two independent clauses: 'Many tourists visit the Grand Canyon to see its famous red rock layers' and 'others prefer to hike down to the Colorado River.' A semicolon is the correct punctuation mark to join these two independent clauses when no coordinating conjunction is present.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the two clauses surrounding the punctuation mark.
The first clause is 'Many tourists visit the Grand Canyon to see its famous red rock layers,' and the second clause is 'others prefer to hike down to the Colorado River.'
To determine the correct punctuation, we must first analyze the grammatical structure of the clauses.
2
Determine if both clauses are independent.
Both clauses can stand alone as complete sentences because they each contain a subject and a verb and express a complete thought.
Independent clauses must be joined by a semicolon, or a comma plus a coordinating conjunction.
3
Select the option that correctly joins the two independent clauses.
The semicolon in the original phrasing correctly joins the two independent clauses without a coordinating conjunction, so the original sentence requires no changes.
A semicolon is appropriate here because there is no coordinating conjunction (such as 'and' or 'but') to link the two independent clauses.

Key Concept

Semicolons are used to link two independent clauses that are closely related in thought, without using a coordinating conjunction.
Estimated Time:45s
Question 649Question

[1] In the 1840s, British botanist Anna Atkins recognized that traditional hand-drawn illustrations were inadequate for capturing the intricate, hair-like structures of British algae. [2] To address this limitation, she turned to the newly invented cyanotype process, which used light-sensitive chemicals to produce precise blue-and-white silhouettes of botanical specimens. [3] Atkins painstakingly placed wet algae directly onto treated paper and exposed it to sunlight, producing images that served as direct physical imprints of the plants. [4] Her resulting self-published work, British Algae: Cyanotype Impressions, is widely considered the first book illustrated with photographs.

The writer wants to add a sentence after Sentence 3 that provides the most specific, concrete visual detail demonstrating the precise botanical features captured by Atkins's cyanotypes. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The prints clearly revealed the delicate, threadlike filaments and translucent cell walls of species like Dictyota dichotoma, details that manual sketches often obscured.

Answer

The prints clearly revealed the delicate, threadlike filaments and translucent cell walls of species like Dictyota dichotoma, details that manual sketches often obscured.
The correct choice most effectively accomplishes the goal because it provides specific, concrete visual details of the plants' structures—specifically, 'delicate, threadlike filaments' and 'translucent cell walls'— and names a specific species to illustrate the precision of the cyanotypes over hand drawings.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal.
The goal is to select a sentence that provides the most specific, concrete visual detail demonstrating the precise botanical features captured by the cyanotypes.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the choices based on their content.
2
Check all choices for grammatical errors and eliminate incorrect constructions.
The option beginning with 'The process was highly efficient' is eliminated due to a dependent clause fragment. The option beginning with 'Revealing the intricate patterns' is eliminated due to a dangling modifier.
ACT English questions require the correct choice to be grammatically sound.
3
Evaluate the remaining grammatically correct options based on the rhetorical goal.
The option detailing the thousands of specimens is grammatically correct but describes collection size rather than visual botanical details. The option detailing the delicate, threadlike filaments and translucent cell walls provides precise, concrete visual descriptions.
Only the latter option meets the specific criteria of demonstrating botanical features with visual details.

Key Concept

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Question 650Question

[1] To protect themselves from predators, members of the glass frog family (Centrolenidae) rely on a unique form of camouflage known as translucency. [2] While many animals use solid colors to blend in with their environments, these frogs possess gelatinous, see-through skin on their limbs and undersides. [3] When perched on a leaf, the frog's body becomes less noticeable. [4] This effect, researchers have discovered, makes it difficult for hunting birds and wasps to detect the frogs under natural lighting conditions.

The writer wants to revise sentence 3 (reproduced below) to provide the most specific, concrete visual detail that illustrates how the frog's translucency functions as camouflage.

*When perched on a leaf, the frog's body becomes less noticeable.*

Which of the following versions of the sentence best achieves this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: When resting on a leaf, the frog’s limbs diffuse light and mirror the exact green hue of the foliage below, blurring the sharp outline of its body.

Answer

When resting on a leaf, the frog’s limbs diffuse light and mirror the exact green hue of the foliage below, blurring the sharp outline of its body.
The correct answer is the version of the sentence that states that the limbs diffuse light, mirror the exact green hue of the foliage below, and blur the sharp outline of the body. This option directly satisfies the rhetorical goal by providing specific, sensory details (such as diffusing light and mirroring the green hue) that explain and illustrate exactly how the frog's translucent body becomes less noticeable and functions as camouflage.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the specific rhetorical goal specified in the prompt.
The goal is to find the revision of sentence 3 that provides the most specific, concrete visual detail of how the frog's translucency works as camouflage.
Understanding the precise requirement ensures that the selected choice is judged on descriptive quality, not just general grammatical correctness.
2
Analyze each option for grammatical correctness, eliminating incorrect structures.
One option contains an introductory dangling modifier, and another incorrect option contains a semicolon error separating a dependent clause. This leaves two grammatically sound options.
ACT English questions require sentences to be free of grammatical errors first before evaluating their rhetorical efficacy.
3
Compare the remaining grammatically correct options based on their level of visual detail.
The option describing light diffusion, mirroring the leaf's green hue, and blurring the body's outline uses highly specific, concrete sensory terms. The alternative option uses abstract, generalized language.
Choosing the option with precise visual descriptions satisfies the rhetorical goal of providing specific, concrete detail.

Key Concept

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 651Question

The following sentences are from a draft of an essay about mathematician Gladys West. To ensure the paragraph logically builds its claim with supporting evidence, arrange the sentences in the most logical order.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The logical order of the sentences begins with the statement that Gladys West performed the essential mathematical modeling for GPS technology, followed by the explanation that she programmed computers to calculate a highly detailed model of the Earth's shape, and ends with the detail that this precise model incorporated gravitational and tidal forces to allow satellites to determine locations.
The paragraph is structured logically starting with the general claim that Gladys West's mathematical modeling enabled GPS technology. The next sentence supports this claim by explaining how she achieved this: programming computers to model the Earth's shape. The final sentence provides the specific, concrete details of this model (incorporating gravity and tides) and connects it back to the functionality of GPS satellites.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the central claim of the paragraph.
The sentence introducing Gladys West's mathematical modeling for GPS serves as the primary claim.
Paragraphs in essays typically begin with a clear topic sentence that introduces the main argument or claim.
2
Find the evidence that directly supports the claim.
The sentence about programming computers to calculate a detailed model of the Earth's shape provides the general evidence.
Evidence should follow the claim immediately to establish how the claim was achieved.
3
Determine the supporting details that elaborate on the evidence.
The sentence explaining that the model incorporated gravity and tidal forces to allow satellites to function provides the specific detail.
Specific technical details and applications logically succeed general descriptions.

Key Concept

Supporting claims with logical evidence and details requires introducing a central claim, presenting general evidence, and then providing specific details or explanation.
Estimated Time:45s
Question 652Question

London's Subterranean Pioneer

[1]
In the mid-nineteenth century, London faced unprecedented street congestion. The city’s population had exploded, and horse-drawn omnibuses, cabs, and carts choked the narrow thoroughfares, making daily commutes a grueling ordeal. In response, a visionary solicitor named Charles Pearson proposed an audacious solution: transporting passengers beneath the city streets. Despite widespread skepticism and fears that the tunnels would collapse or suffocate passengers, Pearson campaigned tirelessly for his idea, eventually securing the support of the City of London.

[2]
In 1860, construction began on the Metropolitan Railway using the 'cut-and-cover' method. Workers excavated a deep trench along existing roadways, built brick archways over the tracks, and then repaved the street above. This approach disrupted surface traffic enormously but allowed for the creation of the world's first underground passenger line. The locomotives utilized were steam-powered, specially designed to condense their own steam to keep the tunnels relatively clear of smoke, though passengers still complained of the coal-scented atmosphere.

[3]
When the railway opened on January 10, 1863, it was an immediate sensation, carrying over thirty thousand passengers on its very first day. The success of the Metropolitan Railway demonstrated the viability of subterranean transit, paving the way for the extensive network known today as the London Underground. Pearson's dream of relieving street traffic by utilizing the space beneath the city had transformed from a ridiculed fantasy into a template for modern urban transportation worldwide.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that details the specific engineering challenges and building materials used in constructing the London Underground throughout the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Is it true that the essay successfully accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: False

Answer

False
The correct answer is false. The essay focuses on the historical motivation and initial opening of the Metropolitan Railway in the early 1860s. It lacks details about building materials (other than a brief mention of brick archways) and does not cover the expansion of the London Underground into the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the writer's proposed goal.
The proposed goal is to detail specific engineering challenges and building materials used in constructing the London Underground throughout the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
This establishes the criteria against which the essay must be evaluated.
2
Analyze the scope and focus of the passage.
The passage describes the origins of the Metropolitan Railway in the 1850s and 1860s, Charles Pearson's advocacy, the basic cut-and-cover construction method, and its opening day in 1863.
This allows for a comparison between the actual content and the proposed goal.
3
Evaluate whether the actual content meets the proposed goal.
The essay is limited to the historical inception and opening of the first line in the 1860s, omitting technical details of engineering challenges, specific building materials, and the system's expansion throughout the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Therefore, the essay does not meet the goal.
This determines the final truth value of the statement.

Key Concept

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 653Question

The following sentence contains two independent clauses that are closely related. What punctuation mark should be placed in the blank to grammatically join these two clauses into a single sentence?

Fill in the blanks below

The astronomer pointed her telescope toward the night sky she immediately spotted the rings of Saturn.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

A semicolon is the correct punctuation mark to join these two independent clauses.
A semicolon is correct because it grammatically links two closely related independent clauses without the use of a coordinating conjunction.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the clauses on both sides of the blank.
The clause before the blank ('The astronomer pointed her telescope toward the night sky') and the clause after the blank ('she immediately spotted the rings of Saturn') are both independent clauses because each can stand alone as a complete sentence.
Identifying the clause type is necessary to determine the proper punctuation rules to apply.
2
Select the correct punctuation mark to connect the two independent clauses without any coordinating conjunctions.
Use a semicolon to separate the clauses.
Two independent clauses that are closely related and not joined by a coordinating conjunction (like 'and', 'but', or 'so') must be separated by a semicolon.

Key Concept

Using a semicolon to link two independent clauses
Question 654Question

[1] In 1995, the reintroduction of gray wolves to Yellowstone National Park initiated a dramatic ecological transformation known as a trophic cascade. [2] Decades of wolf absence had allowed the elk population to explode, leading to severe overgrazing of willow and aspen trees along riverbanks. [3] Once the wolves returned, their predation and presence forced the elk to avoid open valleys, where they were vulnerable. [4] Consequently, the streamside vegetation began to recover rapidly, stabilizing the soil and reducing erosion. [5] This regrowth of trees attracted songbirds and beavers, who used the wood to build dams, creating habitats for fish, amphibians, and waterfowl. [6] The wolves' return ultimately reshaped not just the animal populations, but the physical geography of the park itself.

At this point, the writer is considering adding the following sentence:
'Beavers are known for their ability to significantly alter river ecosystems by building complex lodges and dams.'

Should the writer make this addition after Sentence 4?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because it interrupts the paragraph's detailed tracing of the trophic cascade with a general statement that is redundant with the information in Sentence 5.

Answer

No, because it interrupts the paragraph's detailed tracing of the trophic cascade with a general statement that is redundant with the information in Sentence 5.
The correct option correctly identifies that the proposed sentence should not be added because it disrupts the precise chronological and logical flow of the paragraph. The paragraph details a step-by-step chain of events: wolf reintroduction leads to fewer elk in valleys, which allows vegetation to recover, which in turn attracts beavers that build dams. Inserting a general statement about beaver dam-building behavior after Sentence 4 interrupts this sequence and is redundant, as Sentence 5 already states that the beavers used the wood to build dams.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph explains the cause-and-effect sequence of a trophic cascade in Yellowstone: wolves limit elk grazing, which allows vegetation to recover, which then attracts other animals (like beavers) that modify the ecosystem.
To determine if the proposed sentence is relevant and maintains the paragraph's focus.
2
Evaluate the content of the proposed sentence and its placement after Sentence 4.
The proposed sentence states a general fact about beavers' ability to alter river ecosystems by building dams. Placement after Sentence 4 occurs right after discussing vegetation recovery, but before Sentence 5 introduces beavers being attracted by that vegetation.
To see if the sentence fits logically and chronologically in this specific position.
3
Compare the proposed sentence with the existing text for redundancy and flow.
Sentence 5 already states that beavers 'used the wood to build dams, creating habitats.' The proposed sentence's mention of dam-building is therefore redundant and interrupts the step-by-step narrative flow.
To choose the correct decision (No) and the accurate rhetorical reason.

Key Concept

Evaluating relevance for adding content based on paragraph focus and redundancy.
Question 655Question

The following sentences are from a draft of an essay about the discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation. To ensure the paragraph logically builds its claim that scientific discovery relies on systematically ruling out alternative explanations before accepting a cosmological conclusion, what is the most logical order of the sentences?

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The logical order of the sentences starts with the sentence establishing the central claim, followed by the sentence introducing the hum and initial assumption, then the sentence describing the troubleshooting process, followed by the sentence concluding the source was extraterrestrial after cleaning failed, and finally the sentence identifying the signal as cosmic microwave background radiation.
The correct sequence begins with the overarching claim that the discovery resulted from ruling out mundane explanations. It then introduces the initial detection of the hum and the assumption of terrestrial interference, followed by the specific details of troubleshooting (cleaning the antenna). Next, it notes the failure of the cleaning to solve the problem and the subsequent conclusion that the signal was extraterrestrial, ending with the identification of the signal as the cosmic microwave background radiation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main claim or topic sentence of the paragraph.
The sentence starting with 'The discovery of the Big Bang's echo' serves as the topic sentence because it states the central claim that the discovery was the result of ruling out mundane explanations.
Supporting paragraphs should begin with a clear claim that establishes the framework for the evidence that follows.
2
Find the sentence that introduces the primary evidence or starting point of the historical event.
The sentence starting with 'When physicists Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson' introduces the low-frequency hum in 1964.
This provides the necessary context and introduces the characters and the initial observation.
3
Trace the logical progression of troubleshooting and ruling out alternative explanations.
The sentence starting with 'They spent months troubleshooting' logically follows because it details the troubleshooting steps (cleaning the antenna) to address the interference.
This provides the specific details and evidence supporting the claim of systematically ruling out mundane sources.
4
Identify the transition that shows the results of the troubleshooting.
The sentence starting with 'Only after this thorough cleaning' must follow the cleaning details.
The phrase 'this thorough cleaning' is a transition that directly links back to the cleaning mentioned in the third sentence.
5
Confirm the final sentence that wraps up the paragraph by identifying the signal.
The sentence starting with 'This persistent signal' identifies the hum as the cosmic microwave background radiation.
This provides the resolution to the narrative and connects back to the 'Big Bang's echo' mentioned in the opening claim.

Key Concept

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 656Question

The restorers worked under a tight deadline to clean the exceedingly, rare, oil, paintings, and they documented each step of the conservation process.

Which choice best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: exceedingly rare oil paintings, and they

Answer

The correct punctuation is 'exceedingly rare oil paintings, and they' because no commas should separate the adverb modifying the adjective, or the cumulative adjectives modifying the noun, but a comma is required before the coordinating conjunction joining the two independent clauses.
The correct option correctly recognizes that no commas should separate the adverb 'exceedingly' from the adjective 'rare', or the cumulative modifiers 'rare' and 'oil' from the noun 'paintings'. It also correctly places a comma before the coordinating conjunction 'and' to connect the two independent clauses.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the relationship between 'exceedingly' and 'rare'.
'Exceedingly' is an adverb modifying the adjective 'rare', so no comma should separate them.
Adverbs modifying adjectives are never separated from those adjectives by commas.
2
Analyze the relationship between 'rare', 'oil', and 'paintings'.
'Rare' and 'oil' are cumulative adjectives modifying 'paintings', where 'oil' acts as a noun adjunct closely tied to 'paintings'. Therefore, no commas should separate 'rare' and 'oil', or 'oil' and 'paintings'.
Cumulative adjectives cannot be reordered or separated by 'and', so they must not be separated by commas, and commas should never separate the final adjective from the noun it modifies.
3
Evaluate the clause boundary and structure after 'paintings'.
The sentence contains two independent clauses: 'The restorers worked under a tight deadline to clean the exceedingly rare oil paintings' and 'they documented each step of the conservation process'. Joining them requires a comma followed by the coordinating conjunction 'and'.
A comma and a coordinating conjunction are required to join two independent clauses to avoid a run-on sentence or a comma splice.

Key Concept

Punctuation of coordinate vs. cumulative adjectives, adverbs modifying adjectives, and independent clause coordination.
Question 657Question

In 1912, Alfred Wegener introduced a revolutionary idea that would reshape our understanding of Earth. Wegener, the meteorologist who proposed the theory of continental drift, faced intense skepticism from his peers. Decades later, the discovery of seafloor spreading finally vindicated his vision.

Which of the following choices is the correct punctuation for the underlined portion of the passage?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

NO CHANGE
The correct option preserves the two commas enclosing the nonessential appositive 'the meteorologist who proposed the theory of continental drift' without inserting an incorrect comma before the restrictive relative clause 'who proposed...'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the syntactic role of the underlined phrase relative to the subject.
The phrase 'the meteorologist who proposed the theory of continental drift' is an appositive renaming the subject 'Wegener'. Because 'Wegener' is a proper noun, this descriptive information is nonessential and must be enclosed in commas.
Nonessential elements must be set off from the rest of the sentence by a pair of matching commas.
2
Evaluate the restrictive status of the relative clause within the appositive.
The relative clause 'who proposed the theory of continental drift' is restrictive (essential) because it defines which meteorologist is being discussed. Therefore, there should be no comma before 'who'.
Restrictive elements should not be set off or separated from their referents by commas.
3
Select the option that maintains the correct parenthetical commas without introducing internal punctuation errors.
The version with a comma after Wegener and a comma after drift, with no internal comma before who, is correct.
This punctuation correctly distinguishes essential and nonessential modifications.

Key Concept

Commas with Nonessential and Parenthetical Elements
Question 658Question

In the early twentieth century, German mathematician Emmy Noether proved a theorem that fundamentally linked symmetry and conservation laws. Although her work laid the cornerstone for modern theoretical physics, she initially faced immense institutional barriers due to her gender. The university administration that governed Göttingen, which refused to grant her a formal faculty position allowed her to lecture only under David Hilbert's name.

Which choice best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence to conform to the conventions of standard written English?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: that governed Göttingen, which refused to grant her a formal faculty position, allowed

Answer

that governed Göttingen, which refused to grant her a formal faculty position, allowed
The correct option correctly leaves the restrictive clause 'that governed Göttingen' without surrounding commas, and properly encloses the nonessential clause 'which refused to grant her a formal faculty position' with a pair of commas (one before 'which' and one after 'position').

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the relative clauses in the sentence.
The sentence contains two relative clauses: 'that governed Göttingen' and 'which refused to grant her a formal faculty position'.
Understanding the function of each clause is necessary to determine the correct punctuation.
2
Evaluate the clause 'that governed Göttingen'.
This clause is restrictive (essential) because it identifies which specific university administration is being discussed.
Restrictive clauses must not be set off by commas.
3
Evaluate the clause 'which refused to grant her a formal faculty position'.
This clause is nonrestrictive (nonessential) because it provides additional, non-defining information about the administration.
Nonessential clauses must be enclosed by a pair of commas.
4
Check the punctuation before the main verb 'allowed'.
A comma is required after 'position' to close the nonessential clause, and no commas should surround 'that governed Göttingen'. Semicolons must be avoided as they create fragments when setting off dependent clauses.
This ensures the sentence is grammatically correct and coherent.

Key Concept

Distinguishing between restrictive (essential) and nonrestrictive (nonessential) clauses to apply correct punctuation.
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 659Question

In the mid-twentieth century, researchers mapped the ocean floor using sonar. The maps that Tharp created, which she drafted by hand, proved the existence of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. This discovery supported the theory of continental drift and revolutionized modern geology.

Which of the following choices best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: that Tharp created, which she drafted by hand,

Answer

The correct answer is the option that leaves the restrictive clause unpunctuated and sets off the nonessential clause with a pair of commas.
The correct answer correctly leaves the restrictive clause 'that Tharp created' unpunctuated and sets off the nonessential relative clause 'which she drafted by hand' with a matching pair of commas.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the clause 'that Tharp created' to determine if it is essential (restrictive) or nonessential (nonrestrictive).
Since 'that Tharp created' specifies which particular maps proved the existence of the ridge, it is restrictive and must not be separated from 'The maps' by a comma.
Restrictive clauses are necessary to define the noun they modify and should never be enclosed in commas.
2
Analyze the clause 'which she drafted by hand' to determine if it is essential or nonessential.
The clause 'which she drafted by hand' provides additional, nonessential information about the maps and must be set off with a pair of commas.
Nonessential elements must be set off by parenthetical punctuation (commas, dashes, or parentheses) to indicate they can be removed without changing the core meaning of the sentence.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the one that correctly applies these rules.
The original phrasing contains no comma before 'that' and has commas both before 'which' and after 'hand'.
Only this arrangement correctly maintains the distinction between the restrictive and nonrestrictive elements.

Key Concept

Commas with Nonessential and Parenthetical Elements
Question 660Question

Before the tournament, each players' jersey has it's number printed on the back.

Which of the following is the correct spelling and punctuation of the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: player's jersey has its

Answer

player's jersey has its
The correct option is 'player's jersey has its' because the singular modifier 'each' requires the singular possessive noun 'player's'. Additionally, the possessive pronoun 'its' is needed to show that the number belongs to the jersey.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine if the noun modified by the singular distributor should be singular or plural.
The word 'each' requires a singular noun, so the possessive form must be singular: 'player's'.
To maintain correct grammatical agreement between the singular modifier and the noun.
2
Determine whether to use a possessive pronoun or a contraction.
The sentence indicates possession over the number, so the possessive pronoun 'its' is correct.
The contraction 'it's' means 'it is' or 'it has', which is grammatically incorrect in this context.

Key Concept

Apostrophes for Possessives and Contractions
PreviousPage 33 / 278Next
All practice questions — ACT | Examkin