All practice questions

5556 questions

Question 781Question

Given the following paragraph:

[1] __________________. In 1943, Cousteau and engineer Émile Gagnan co-invented the Aqua-Lung, an open-circuit scuba technology. This revolutionary device allowed divers to breathe underwater without being tethered to a surface air supply. Armed with this new freedom, Cousteau spent decades filming underwater documentaries, bringing the mysteries of the deep ocean into the living rooms of millions of viewers worldwide.

Which choice provides the most effective introduction to the paragraph?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: French oceanographer Jacques Cousteau transformed our understanding of the oceans through his inventions and explorations.

Answer

French oceanographer Jacques Cousteau transformed our understanding of the oceans through his inventions and explorations.
The correct option is grammatically correct and successfully previews the paragraph's dual focus on technological invention (the Aqua-Lung) and ocean exploration (his documentaries).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary topics discussed in the paragraph's body sentences.
The paragraph details the co-invention of the Aqua-Lung (an invention) and the subsequent filming of underwater documentaries (explorations).
An effective introduction must establish the paragraph's main focus by previewing these key elements.
2
Evaluate the grammar of the choices to eliminate structurally incorrect sentences.
One option contains a comma splice, another is a dependent clause fragment, and a third contains a subject-verb agreement error where a singular subject is paired with a plural verb.
ACT English questions require that the chosen option be grammatically correct.
3
Choose the grammatically correct option that best introduces the dual focus of the paragraph.
The statement describing Cousteau's transformation of our understanding of the oceans through inventions and explorations is both grammatically correct and thematic.
It encapsulates both the technological development and the oceanographic exploration detailed in the paragraph.

Key Concept

Establishing Introductions and Thesis Statements
Question 782Question

Translating the Machine

[1]
In 1947, Grace Hopper, a mathematician and pioneer in computer programming, was working on the Harvard Mark II computer when she and her team discovered a literal bug—a moth trapped in a relay, impeding the machine’s operation. While this incident popularized the term "debugging," Hopper's most significant contribution was yet to come. She envisioned a future where programming was accessible, proposing that computers could be programmed using English-like statements rather than binary code.

[2]
At the time, the computing establishment was highly skeptical. Many believed that computers were purely mathematical instruments capable only of arithmetic, and that writing programs in natural language was an impossibility. Undeterred, Hopper joined the Eckert-Mauchly Computer Corporation in 1949 and began developing the first compiler, a program that would translate human-readable source code into machine language. By 1952, her compiler, known as the A-0, was operational, paving the way for modern programming languages like COBOL.

[3]
Hopper’s work revolutionized how humans interacted with machines. Instead of writing tedious strings of octal or binary code, programmers could write instructions using mathematical symbols and English words. The compiler would then do the translation. This shift not only democratized programming by making it accessible to non-mathematicians but also dramatically increased efficiency and reduced errors, laying the groundwork for the software industry.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that describes how Grace Hopper's invention of the compiler overcame early skepticism to fundamentally change computer programming. Is the statement that the passage successfully fulfills this goal true or false?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: True

Answer

True
The correct answer is True because the essay successfully presents Grace Hopper's invention of the compiler, explains the skepticism of the computing establishment, and details the revolutionary impact on programming.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the proposed writing goal in the prompt.
The goal contains three key requirements: describing Hopper's compiler invention, showing how she overcame early skepticism, and explaining how it fundamentally changed programming.
To establish a checklist of what needs to be verified in the passage.
2
Scan the passage for references to skepticism and the compiler's creation.
Paragraph 2 details that the computing establishment was highly skeptical and believed natural-language programming was impossible, but Hopper built the A-0 compiler by 1952 anyway.
To check if the first two components of the goal are addressed.
3
Scan the passage for references to how programming changed.
Paragraph 3 describes how the compiler allowed programming with English words instead of binary strings, democratizing programming and increasing efficiency.
To check if the final component of the goal is addressed.
4
Synthesize findings to determine if the goal is met.
Since all parts of the goal are covered in the text, the statement is true.
To finalize the evaluation of the true/false statement.

Key Concept

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 783Question

[1] In the winter of 1902, during a visit to New York City, Mary Anderson observed a trolley driver struggling to keep the windshield clear of freezing sleet. [2] The driver had to open the front window, lean out into the icy wind, or even stop the trolley entirely to wipe the glass by hand. [3] Recognizing a clear need, Anderson sketched a design for a hand-operated rubber squeegee blade that could be controlled via a lever inside the vehicle. [4] She was granted a patent for her window-cleaning device in 1903. [5] Early twentieth-century trolleys and automobiles operated at much slower speeds than modern vehicles do. [6] Unfortunately, automotive manufacturers of the era failed to see the commercial value in her design, mistakenly believing that the motion of the blades would distract drivers.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 5 from the paragraph. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the development and reception of Anderson's invention with an irrelevant detail about the operating speeds of early vehicles.

Answer

Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the development and reception of Anderson's invention with an irrelevant detail about the operating speeds of early vehicles.
The correct choice is the option that suggests deleting the sentence because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the development and reception of Anderson's invention. The paragraph is centered on how Mary Anderson saw a problem and invented a solution, which was subsequently rejected by manufacturers. The speed of early twentieth-century vehicles is an unrelated detail that distracts from this sequence of events.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes Mary Anderson observing a problem, inventing the windshield wiper, receiving a patent, and having it rejected by manufacturers.
Establishing the paragraph's core topic is necessary to evaluate the relevance of any single sentence.
2
Evaluate the content and role of Sentence 5.
Sentence 5 discusses the slow speeds of early twentieth-century vehicles compared to modern ones.
Determining what Sentence 5 contributes allows us to see if it supports the core topic or distracts from it.
3
Determine whether to keep or delete the sentence based on its relevance.
The sentence shifts the focus away from the invention story to general vehicle speeds, making it irrelevant. It should be deleted.
Irrelevant sentences that disrupt the flow and focus of a paragraph should be deleted.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 784Question

Identify the punctuation mark that should fill the blank to ensure the sentence is grammatically correct and consistent.

Fill in the blanks below

Although the standard theory of planet formation suggests that gas giants form far from their host stars—where temperatures are low enough for volatile compounds to condense the discovery of 'hot Jupiters' orbiting mere fractions of an astronomical unit from their stars has forced astrophysicists to revise their models of planetary migration.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

A dash (—)
The parenthetical clause detailing where gas giants form ('—where temperatures are low enough for volatile compounds to condense') is opened with an em dash. To maintain grammatical consistency, the clause must also be closed with a dash. A dash is the only punctuation mark that correctly completes this pair.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the structure of the sentence, focusing on the parenthetical element setting off the description of where gas giants form.
Identify that the parenthetical clause begins with an em dash ('—where temperatures are low enough for volatile compounds to condense').
To set off parenthetical or nonessential information, punctuation marks must be consistent on both sides.
2
Determine the matching punctuation mark needed to close the parenthetical element before the main clause begins.
Since the parenthetical phrase is opened with a dash, it must be closed with a dash to maintain consistency.
Mismatching a dash with a comma or parenthesis is grammatically incorrect in standard English conventions.

Key Concept

Dash pair consistency for nonessential parenthetical elements
Question 785Question

While mapping the outer edges of the galaxy, the astrophysicists recorded several highly, unusual, rapidly pulsating, signals; and they immediately cross-referenced the coordinates with existing stellar databases.

Which of the following is the best choice for the underlined portion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: highly unusual, rapidly pulsating signals, and they immediately cross-referenced

Answer

highly unusual, rapidly pulsating signals, and they immediately cross-referenced
The correct answer properly handles both the adjective punctuation and the clause coordination. In the noun phrase, 'highly' and 'rapidly' are adverbs that modify the adjacent adjectives ('unusual' and 'pulsating'), so no commas should separate them. The coordinate adjective phrases 'highly unusual' and 'rapidly pulsating' must be separated by a comma, but no comma should separate the final adjective 'pulsating' from the noun 'signals'. At the clause boundary, a comma followed by the coordinating conjunction 'and' is correctly used to join the two independent clauses.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the punctuation within the adjective phrase modifying the noun 'signals'.
Identify that 'highly' and 'rapidly' are adverbs modifying the adjectives 'unusual' and 'pulsating'. No commas should separate an adverb from the adjective it modifies. The phrases 'highly unusual' and 'rapidly pulsating' act as coordinate adjectives modifying 'signals', meaning they require a comma between them, but no comma should be placed between the final adjective 'pulsating' and the noun 'signals'.
To ensure modifiers and coordinate adjectives are punctuated correctly.
2
Identify the clause boundary and the nature of the clauses.
The sentence contains two clauses: 'the astrophysicists recorded several...' and 'they immediately cross-referenced...'. Both can stand alone as independent sentences.
To determine the appropriate punctuation and conjunctions needed to join the clauses.
3
Determine the correct punctuation to join the two independent clauses.
The clauses must be joined using either a semicolon or a comma followed by a coordinating conjunction (such as 'and'). A comma followed by 'and' is the grammatically correct choice here.
To avoid a comma splice or run-on sentence.

Key Concept

Punctuation of coordinate adjectives and coordination of independent clauses
Question 786Question

[1] In the mid-twentieth century, geologist Marie Tharp set out to map the ocean floor, utilizing sonar data to draft the first comprehensive three-dimensional representation of the seabed. [2] Barred from research vessels due to her gender, Tharp relied entirely on depth profiles collected by her colleague Bruce Heezen. [3] By painstakingly plotting these profiles by hand, she identified a deep, continuous V-shaped valley slicing through the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. [4] Initially, Heezen dismissed Tharp's drawings as "girl talk," fearing that the existence of a central rift valley would lend credibility to the then-marginalized theory of continental drift. [5] It was not until independent photographic evidence of the rift was obtained that Heezen and the scientific establishment accepted Tharp's map as accurate.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence to the paragraph (placed after Sentence 4):

"Continental drift, first proposed by Alfred Wegener in 1912, suggested that Earth's continents had once been joined as a single landmass before drifting apart."

Should the writer make this addition?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because it interrupts the paragraph's narrative flow by introducing biographical and historical details about a different scientist.

Answer

No, because it interrupts the paragraph's narrative flow by introducing biographical and historical details about a different scientist.
The correct answer is the option stating that the sentence should not be added because it interrupts the paragraph's narrative flow by introducing biographical and historical details about a different scientist. The paragraph's focus is on Tharp's role in mapping the ocean floor and the discovery of the rift valley; adding information about Alfred Wegener and the definition of continental drift shifts the focus away from Tharp's narrative.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph centers on Marie Tharp's scientific work, specifically her efforts to map the ocean floor, her discovery of the rift valley, and the scientific community's eventual validation of her work.
Understanding the paragraph's primary focus is essential to evaluating whether any proposed addition is relevant or represents a digression.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the proposed sentence.
The proposed sentence defines continental drift and attributes it to Alfred Wegener in 1912. This information shifts the subject to a different historical figure and theory, which is not the main focus of the passage.
Determining the function of the proposed sentence reveals if it contributes to or disrupts the development of the paragraph.
3
Select the option that correctly identifies the addition as irrelevant and provides the appropriate rhetorical justification.
The correct option states that the sentence should not be added because it interrupts the narrative flow by introducing details about a different scientist.
Only one choice correctly advises against the addition and identifies the correct rhetorical reason for doing so.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 787Question

Ancient Roman builders created a highly durable concrete by mixing two key ingredients: volcanic ash and slaked lime.

Which choice best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: ingredients: volcanic

Answer

ingredients: volcanic
The correct choice correctly uses a colon to introduce a list of items after an independent clause. The clause before the colon ('Ancient Roman builders created a highly durable concrete by mixing two key ingredients') can stand alone as a complete sentence, which is the primary requirement for using a colon.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the clause before the punctuation mark to determine if it is independent.
The clause 'Ancient Roman builders created a highly durable concrete by mixing two key ingredients' is a complete thought with a subject and a verb.
Colons must be preceded by a complete independent clause.
2
Examine the element following the punctuation mark.
'volcanic ash and slaked lime' is a list of two items identifying the ingredients.
A colon is the correct punctuation mark to introduce a list following an independent clause.
3
Evaluate and rule out the incorrect options.
The option with 'including' followed by a colon is incorrect because 'including' makes the preceding clause incomplete. The option with 'they were' separated by a comma creates a comma splice. The option with a semicolon is incorrect because a semicolon must separate two independent clauses, but the second part here is a fragment.
Only one choice is grammatically correct under standard English conventions.

Key Concept

Colons must be preceded by a complete independent clause and are used to introduce a list, explanation, or amplification.
Estimated Time:45s
Question 788Question

A writer is editing a draft of an essay about the botanist Ynes Mexia.

[1] In her mid-fifties, Ynes Mexia began her career as a botanical collector, embarking on rugged expeditions across the Americas that would redefine the field. [2] Unlike many of her contemporaries who remained in laboratories, Mexia traveled deep into remote wildernesses, including the dense rainforests of the Amazon, to locate rare specimens. [3] Her efforts yielded an astonishing number of discoveries that significantly expanded botanical databases. [4] She was known for her meticulous preparation of plant samples, which she dried and categorized under harsh conditions.

The writer wants to revise sentence [3] to provide the most specific and concrete evidence to support the claim that Mexia's work significantly expanded scientific knowledge of plants. Which of the following sentences best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Over her career, she collected nearly 145000145{}000 plant specimens, which resulted in the addition of over 500500 newly discovered species to scientific records.

Answer

The sentence that specifies she collected nearly 145,000 plant specimens and added over 500 newly discovered species to scientific records.
The correct choice provides specific, concrete numerical data (nearly 145,000 specimens and over 500 new species) that directly supports the claim that the botanist's work expanded scientific databases. It is also grammatically correct, avoiding syntax errors.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the claim made in sentence 3 regarding Ynes Mexia's discoveries significantly expanding botanical databases.
The target claim requires evidence demonstrating the volume, scale, or impact of her collections on botanical records.
Identifying the target claim is essential for selecting the revision that provides direct supporting evidence.
2
Evaluate the choices for concrete, specific details that support this claim while checking for grammatical accuracy.
The revision detailing nearly 145,000 specimens and over 500 new species provides precise data, whereas the other options contain syntax errors (semicolon fragment, dangling modifier, comma splice) and lack concrete numbers.
Standardized tests require both rhetorical relevance (specific details) and grammatical correctness.

Key Concept

Supporting claims with specific, concrete evidence and details
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 789Question

Although the botanist identified the rare, fragile wildflower, she did not pick it, instead she photographed the specimen for her research journal.

Which choice best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: rare, fragile wildflower, she did not pick it; instead, she photographed

Answer

rare, fragile wildflower, she did not pick it; instead, she photographed
The correct option properly applies punctuation rules across three areas. First, it correctly places a comma between the coordinate adjectives 'rare' and 'fragile' but omits a comma after 'fragile' before the noun 'wildflower'. Second, it uses a comma to separate the introductory dependent clause starting with 'Although' from the main clause. Third, it uses a semicolon before 'instead' and a comma after it to connect the two independent clauses without creating a comma splice.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the relationship between the adjectives 'rare' and 'fragile' modifying 'wildflower'.
The adjectives are coordinate because they can be reversed ('fragile, rare') and joined by 'and' ('rare and fragile'). Therefore, a comma is required between them, but no comma should be placed between the final adjective ('fragile') and the noun ('wildflower').
This rules out options that insert a comma after 'fragile'.
2
Identify the clause boundaries and the function of 'Although'.
'Although the botanist identified the rare, fragile wildflower' is a dependent introductory clause. It must be joined to the main clause with a comma, not a semicolon.
This rules out options that place a semicolon immediately after 'wildflower'.
3
Examine the connection between the two subsequent clauses: 'she did not pick it' and 'she photographed the specimen...'.
Both are independent clauses. Joining them with only a comma and the conjunctive adverb 'instead' creates a comma splice. A semicolon is required before 'instead' to properly separate the independent clauses.
This rules out the original phrasing (NO CHANGE) and confirms the correct punctuation.

Key Concept

Punctuation of coordinate adjectives, introductory clauses, and independent clauses joined by conjunctive adverbs
Question 790Question

Type the punctuation mark that belongs in the blank to join the two independent clauses.

Fill in the blanks below

Many modern architects prefer to use reclaimed timber for structural support this material offers exceptional durability while reducing the carbon footprint of new construction.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

A semicolon (;) is the correct punctuation mark to join the two independent clauses.
A semicolon is the correct punctuation mark because it is used to connect two closely related independent clauses without a coordinating conjunction. In the given sentence, the clauses on both sides of the blank are independent, meaning they contain a subject and a verb and express a complete thought.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the grammatical structure of the clauses on either side of the blank.
The clause before the blank ('Many modern architects prefer to use reclaimed timber for structural support') is an independent clause. The clause after the blank ('this material offers exceptional durability while reducing the carbon footprint of new construction') is also an independent clause.
Identifying clause types is necessary to determine which punctuation rules apply.
2
Determine the appropriate punctuation to join two independent clauses without a coordinating conjunction.
A semicolon is the standard punctuation mark used to link two closely related independent clauses when no coordinating conjunction (like 'and', 'but', or 'so') is present.
Using a comma alone would result in a comma splice, and omitting punctuation entirely would result in a run-on sentence.

Key Concept

Semicolons
Question 791Question

Botanists were shocked in 1994 when they discovered a small grove of Wollemi pines in a remote Australian canyon. The prehistoric trees, which were previously thought to have been extinct for millions of years, survived in deep sandstone gorges. Conservationists immediately began a propagation program to safeguard the species.

Which of the following is the best punctuation for the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

NO CHANGE
The correct choice is the option that keeps the original punctuation. The clause describing the history of the Wollemi pines is nonessential to the core meaning of the sentence, so it must be enclosed by a pair of commas: one after 'trees' and one after 'years'. This correctly links the subject 'trees' to its verb 'survived'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine if the underlined clause is essential or nonessential to the sentence.
The clause 'which were previously thought to have been extinct for millions of years' is nonessential because removing it does not change the core meaning of the main clause ('The prehistoric trees survived in deep sandstone gorges').
Nonessential elements must be set off from the rest of the sentence by punctuation on both sides.
2
Verify the correct punctuation to set off the nonessential relative clause.
A pair of commas is required: one starting the clause after 'trees' and one closing it after 'years'.
This properly encloses the parenthetical description, leaving the main subject and verb connected.

Key Concept

Commas with Nonessential and Parenthetical Elements
Estimated Time:45s
Question 792Question

Beneath the streets of London lies a complex web of tunnels that represents one of the greatest engineering feats of the nineteenth century: the London Underground. In the 1840s, London was experiencing unprecedented growth, leading to extreme congestion on its narrow roads. Horse-drawn carriages, omnibuses, and pedestrians clogged the city center, making travel slow and chaotic. Charles Pearson, a city solicitor, proposed a radical solution—an underground railway to transport passengers between the city's main railway termini.

Construction on the Metropolitan Railway began in 1860 using the 'cut-and-cover' method. Workers dug a trench along existing roads, built brick arches over the tracks, and then repaved the street above. The line officially opened on January 10, 1863, utilizing steam locomotives that ran on coal, which often filled the tunnels with smoke. Despite the initial concerns about air quality and safety, the railway was an immediate success, carrying tens of thousands of passengers on its opening day.

This pioneering venture proved that subterranean transit was not only possible but also highly profitable. The success of the Metropolitan Railway paved the way for the expansion of underground transit systems in cities around the world, transforming urban planning and the daily commutes of millions.

Suppose the writer’s goal had been to write an essay that details the physical construction process and the initial public reception of the world's first underground passenger railway. The essay successfully accomplishes this goal.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: True

Answer

True
The statement is correct because the essay details the 'cut-and-cover' method of construction and mentions the opening day success and safety concerns, thus fulfilling both parts of the stated writing goal.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the proposed goal to identify the required components.
The goal requires the essay to cover two main aspects: the physical construction process and the initial public reception of the first underground railway.
Breaking down the goal into distinct requirements allows for structured evaluation.
2
Scan the passage for details regarding the physical construction process.
The second paragraph describes the 'cut-and-cover' method, detailing how workers dug a trench, built brick arches over the tracks, and repaved the street.
This confirms that the first component of the writing goal is met.
3
Scan the passage for details regarding the initial public reception.
The second paragraph mentions that the line opened on January 10, 1863, and despite concerns about air quality and safety, it was an immediate success, carrying tens of thousands of passengers on opening day.
This confirms that the second component of the writing goal is met.
4
Formulate the final evaluation based on the evidence.
Since both elements of the writing goal are explicitly addressed in the essay, the statement is True.
Synthesizing the individual step evaluations leads to the correct answer choice.

Key Concept

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Question 793Question

While visiting New York City in the winter of 1903, Mary Anderson noticed that streetcar drivers had to open their windows in the freezing rain to clear sleet from their windshields. She sketched a design for a hand-operated swinging arm with a rubber blade that could be controlled from inside the cabin. She was granted a patent for her device later that year, though manufacturing companies initially showed little interest. Today, windshield wipers are standard equipment on almost all motorized vehicles.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence to the end of the paragraph:

'During her trip to New York, Anderson also visited several popular art museums and historical landmarks.'

Should the writer make this addition?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because it deviates from the paragraph's focus on Anderson's invention of the windshield wiper.

Answer

No, because it deviates from the paragraph's focus on Anderson's invention of the windshield wiper.
The paragraph focuses on Mary Anderson's invention of the windshield wiper, tracking the process from her observation of the problem to the patent and its modern use. The proposed sentence about visiting art museums and historical landmarks is irrelevant to this central focus, so it should not be added.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes how Mary Anderson observed a problem in New York City, designed the windshield wiper, patented it, and how it is used today.
Understanding the paragraph's main theme is necessary to evaluate whether new information is relevant.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the proposed sentence to the main focus.
The proposed sentence details Anderson's tourist activities (visiting museums and landmarks), which do not contribute to the narrative of how she invented and patented the windshield wiper.
This determines whether the sentence should be added (Yes) or not added (No).
3
Select the choice that correctly states the decision and provides the proper rhetorical justification.
The correct choice is the one stating that the writer should not add the sentence because it deviates from the paragraph's focus.
This completes the evaluation and matches the correct option.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 794Question

The following passage is an excerpt from a history of Mayan archaeology.

For decades, Mayan scholars believed that the hieroglyphs carved into stone stelae recorded only mythical stories and astronomical tables. In 1960, Tatiana Proskouriakoff published a breakthrough study of the glyphs at Piedras Negras. She demonstrated that the monument inscriptions, which were carved at regular intervals of five hotuns, actually detailed the births, accessions, and victories of historical rulers.

Which choice best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

The correct choice is the one that sets off the nonessential relative clause with a pair of commas, using 'which' and placing commas both after 'inscriptions' and after 'hotuns'.
The correct choice successfully identifies the clause as nonessential and uses a matching pair of commas to set it off. The relative pronoun 'which' is appropriate for nonrestrictive clauses, and commas are placed correctly after 'inscriptions' and after 'hotuns'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the grammatical role of the relative clause starting with 'which'.
The clause 'which were carved at regular intervals of five hotuns' is nonessential (nonrestrictive) because the noun phrase 'the monument inscriptions' is already specific, meaning the clause adds extra details rather than identifying which inscriptions are meant.
Determining whether a clause is essential or nonessential dictates the type of punctuation required.
2
Select the correct punctuation pattern for nonessential elements.
Nonessential elements must be set off from the rest of the sentence by a matching pair of punctuation marks, such as commas.
Setting off parenthetical information at both ends ensures clear sentence structure and flow.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the one that correctly implements a pair of commas and uses the appropriate relative pronoun.
The original phrasing correctly starts the nonessential clause with 'which' and surrounds it with commas. The option omitting the second comma, the option putting commas around 'that', and the option using a semicolon are incorrect.
Only one option adheres to all rules of punctuation and relative pronoun usage.

Key Concept

Commas with Nonessential and Parenthetical Elements
Question 795Question

The following passage is an excerpt from a biography of a historic figure.

When the chief engineer of the Brooklyn Bridge fell ill in 1872, his wife Emily Warren Roebling stepped in to manage the daily operations of the monumental project. The engineers who drafted the daily blueprints, which were critical to the project, met with Emily Roebling every morning to receive instructions. Ultimately, her dedication ensured the successful completion of what was then the longest suspension bridge in the world.

Which of the following is the most effective punctuation for the underlined portion of the passage?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

The correct option is the original phrasing, which leaves the restrictive clause unpunctuated and encloses the nonessential relative clause in a pair of commas.
The correct choice keeps the restrictive relative clause 'who drafted the daily blueprints' unpunctuated, as it is essential to identifying which specific engineers are being discussed. Additionally, it correctly sets off the nonessential relative clause 'which were critical to the project' with commas on both sides, separating it from the main flow of the sentence.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the underlined portion to identify the clauses and determine their essentiality.
The clause 'who drafted the daily blueprints' is essential (restrictive) because it specifies which engineers met with Emily Roebling. The clause 'which were critical to the project' is nonessential (nonrestrictive) because it simply adds descriptive details about the blueprints.
Essential clauses should not be separated by commas, while nonessential clauses must be enclosed in commas.
2
Evaluate the punctuation rules for both clauses to determine the correct punctuation layout.
No commas should precede 'who', but commas must enclose 'which were critical to the project', leading to a comma before 'which' and a comma after 'project'.
This maintains the grammatical structure of the sentence without causing fragments or separating modifiers from their nouns.

Key Concept

Commas with Nonessential and Parenthetical Elements
Question 796Question

The following passage is an excerpt from an essay on the history of science.

In the mid-twentieth century, the scientific community remained skeptical of plate tectonics. Marie Tharp, a pioneering cartographer, created the ocean map that proved the theory of continental drift. Her meticulous work revealed the dramatic topography of the ocean floor, transforming geology forever.

Which choice is the correct punctuation for the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

NO CHANGE
The correct choice properly uses a pair of commas to set off the nonessential appositive 'a pioneering cartographer' while leaving the restrictive relative clause 'that proved the theory of continental drift' unpunctuated.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify nonessential elements in the sentence.
The phrase 'a pioneering cartographer' is an appositive describing Marie Tharp. Since removing it does not change the core meaning of the sentence, it is nonessential and must be enclosed by a pair of commas.
Nonessential appositives require punctuation on both sides to set them apart from the rest of the sentence.
2
Identify restrictive elements in the sentence.
The relative clause 'that proved the theory of continental drift' is restrictive because it defines exactly which ocean map is being referred to. It should not be set off by commas.
Restrictive clauses are essential to the meaning of the sentence and must not be separated from their referent.
3
Evaluate the option choices against these rules.
Only the original phrasing ('NO CHANGE') correctly uses a pair of commas for the appositive and leaves the restrictive clause unpunctuated.
This maintains correct grammatical structure and sentence clarity.

Key Concept

Commas with Nonessential and Parenthetical Elements
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 797Question

To successfully harvest natural vanilla, farmers must execute a tedious task, they must hand-pollinate each orchid blossom during a narrow morning window.

Which choice most effectively punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: task: they must hand-pollinate

Answer

The option using a colon to introduce the explanation of the task is the correct choice.
The correct option uses a colon to separate two independent clauses. The clause preceding the colon is independent and can stand alone as a complete sentence, and the clause following the colon directly explains and defines the 'tedious task' mentioned in the first clause.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the grammatical structure of the clause preceding the punctuation.
The clause 'To successfully harvest natural vanilla, farmers must execute a tedious task' is an independent clause because it contains a subject and a verb and can stand alone as a complete sentence.
A colon must always be preceded by a complete independent clause.
2
Analyze the relationship between the first clause and the following clause.
The clause 'they must hand-pollinate each orchid blossom during a narrow morning window' is also independent and directly explains or defines the 'tedious task' mentioned in the first clause.
A colon is appropriate for joining two independent clauses when the second clause explains, illustrates, or expands on the first.
3
Evaluate the incorrect options to identify their grammatical errors.
Using a comma alone creates a comma splice. A colon placed after 'requires' follows a verb rather than a complete clause. A comma before 'that' improperly sets off a restrictive clause.
Eliminating grammatically incorrect options confirms the correct punctuation choice.

Key Concept

Using colons to connect independent clauses or introduce explanations
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 798Question

Sea otters are among the few marine mammals known to use tools. To crack open the hard shells of prey like clams and mussels, an otter will float on its back, place a flat rock on its chest, and hammer the shellfish against the rock. _Many people enjoy visiting aquariums to watch sea otters swim and play._ This tool-use behavior is not just a clever trick; it is a vital survival skill passed down from mothers to their pups.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence. Should the writer make this deletion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on how sea otters use tools to feed.

Answer

The sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on how sea otters use tools to feed.
The paragraph focuses on how wild sea otters use tools (rocks) to crack open food shells, which is a vital survival skill. The underlined sentence, which discusses people visiting aquariums to watch sea otters, deviates from this central topic. Therefore, the sentence should be deleted because it disrupts the paragraph's cohesive focus.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the unique tool-use behavior of sea otters (using rocks to crack shells to get food) and explains that this is a vital survival skill.
Determining the main idea allows us to evaluate whether the underlined sentence supports or distracts from it.
2
Analyze the underlined sentence to see if it aligns with the paragraph's focus.
The underlined sentence mentions people watching sea otters in public aquariums. This is unrelated to the biological and evolutionary tool-use behaviors of wild sea otters.
This step determines whether the sentence is relevant to the topic.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the one that correctly identifies the decision and the rhetorical reason.
The decision is to delete the sentence, and the correct reason is that it interrupts the paragraph's focus on tool use.
This leads directly to selecting the correct answer.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 799Question

To determine the age of the ancient timber, the dendrochronologists extracted several thin cylindrical, core samples, and they examined the growth rings under a high-powered microscope.

Which choice best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: thin, cylindrical core samples, and they examined

Answer

The correct choice is the one that punctuates the coordinate adjectives with a comma ('thin, cylindrical'), keeps the cumulative adjective and noun modifier unpunctuated ('core samples'), and uses a comma before the coordinating conjunction 'and' to connect the two independent clauses.
The correct choice properly applies the rules of punctuation for coordinate adjectives and independent clauses. The adjectives 'thin' and 'cylindrical' are coordinate because they can be reversed and joined by 'and' while maintaining a natural sound; therefore, a comma must separate them. The word 'core' acts as a noun adjunct modifying 'samples,' making 'cylindrical' and 'core' cumulative adjectives, which should not be separated by a comma. Finally, the sentence contains two independent clauses joined by the coordinating conjunction 'and,' which requires a comma beforehand to avoid a run-on sentence.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the relationship between the adjectives modifying the noun phrase 'core samples'.
The adjectives 'thin' and 'cylindrical' are coordinate adjectives because they can be reversed ('cylindrical, thin') and connected by 'and' ('thin and cylindrical') naturally. Therefore, they require a comma between them. However, 'core' acts as a noun adjunct modifying 'samples,' making 'cylindrical' and 'core' cumulative adjectives, which should not have a comma between them.
To determine the correct punctuation between modifiers and the noun.
2
Identify the clause structure of the entire sentence to determine the correct conjunction and punctuation.
The sentence consists of two independent clauses: 'the dendrochronologists extracted several thin, cylindrical core samples' and 'they examined the growth rings...'. These two complete thoughts are joined by the coordinating conjunction 'and,' which requires a comma before it.
To ensure correct connection of independent clauses and avoid run-on sentences or comma splices.
3
Evaluate the remaining options against the rules identified in Steps 1 and 2.
The correct choice must read: 'thin, cylindrical core samples, and they examined'. The other options fail by omitting the required comma between coordinate adjectives, separating the adjective from its noun, creating a comma splice, or creating a sentence fragment with an incorrect semicolon.
To select the grammatically correct option that fits all rules.

Key Concept

Commas with Lists, Clauses, and Coordinate Adjectives
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 800Question

In the mid-twentieth century, scholars of Maya hieroglyphic writing widely believed that the inscriptions on stone monuments, or stelae, were purely astronomical calendars and mystical calculations. The prevailing view, championed by leading Mayanist J. Eric S. Thompson, held that the Maya were a peaceful, time-obsessed people whose writing did not record historical events or individuals. However, Tatiana Proskouriakoff, an architect and archaeologist, challenged this consensus through meticulous spatial and temporal analysis of the stelae at Piedras Negras. By plotting the dates inscribed on consecutive monuments, she discovered that the timespans between key dates corresponded perfectly to the natural length of a human life. Proskouriakoff proposed that these monuments actually commemorated the lifespans, accessions, and military victories of historical rulers.

The writer wants to conclude the passage with a sentence that reinforces the significance of Proskouriakoff's discovery and ties back to the paragraph's discussion of Maya writing. Which of the following sentences best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Her groundbreaking insight shifted the paradigm of Maya studies, revealing that the complex glyphs recorded a rich history of human dynasties rather than mere calendar calculations.

Answer

The sentence noting that her groundbreaking insight shifted the paradigm of Maya studies by showing that the complex glyphs recorded a history of human dynasties rather than mere calendar calculations.
The correct option effectively reinforces the significance of Proskouriakoff's discovery by contrasting the original view (calendar calculations) with the new historical understanding (human dynasties). It is grammatically correct and matches the academic tone of the passage.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the passage to identify the main thesis and context.
The passage details a historical shift in Mayanist scholarship, moving from the belief that glyphs were strictly astronomical to realizing they documented real history and human rulers, initiated by Tatiana Proskouriakoff.
Identifying the central theme is necessary to select a concluding sentence that logically wraps up the paragraph.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness.
The option with 'actual history, this discovery' is a comma splice, and the option with 'opens... and revolutionized' contains an inconsistent tense shift.
An ACT concluding sentence must be grammatically correct before evaluating its rhetorical suitability.
3
Select the option that best fulfills the rhetorical goal.
The option addressing Thompson's preface and medals introduces new, unrelated details. The option addressing the paradigm shift to recording human dynasties directly links back to the starting conflict (calendars vs. history) and reinforces the significance of the work.
A strong concluding sentence must summarize the passage's main points without introducing unsupported details.

Key Concept

Selecting Concluding Sentences and Transitions
Estimated Time:1m 30s
PreviousPage 40 / 278Next
All practice questions — ACT | Examkin