Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardJim Crow, Disenfranchisement, and Legal Segregation

Read the following excerpt from a speech by delegate Carter Glass at the Virginia Constitutional Convention of 1901–1902:

"Discrimination? Why, that is precisely what we propose; that, exactly, is what this Convention was elected for—to discriminate to the very extremity of permissible action under the limitations of the Federal Constitution, with a view to the elimination of every Negro voter who can be gotten rid of, legally, without materially impairing the numerical strength of the white electorate."

Which of the following legal strategies best illustrates how Southern states achieved the goal described by Glass while remaining within the limits of the Federal Constitution?

  1. Implementing facially neutral statutory qualifications, such as literacy tests and poll taxes, that did not explicitly reference race but were disparately administered to disenfranchise Black votersAnswer
  2. B
    Relying on de facto customary segregation patterns and private agreements rather than state-level statutory actions to restrict Black voter registration
  3. C
    Invoking the penal exception of the Thirteenth Amendment to classify unregistered Black residents as state convicts, thereby placing them in involuntary servitude
  4. D
    Amending sharecropping contracts to legally redefine agricultural laborers as non-citizens ineligible for constitutional voting protections

Answer

Implementing facially neutral statutory qualifications, such as literacy tests and poll taxes, that did not explicitly reference race but were disparately administered to disenfranchise Black voters
The correct answer is the option describing the implementation of facially neutral qualifications. The Fifteenth Amendment prohibited disenfranchisement based explicitly on race, color, or previous condition of servitude. To circumvent this constitutional restriction, Southern states at constitutional conventions in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries enacted measures like literacy tests, understanding clauses, and poll taxes. These measures did not mention race, making them facially neutral, but local registrars administered them with extreme bias to systematically eliminate Black voters while keeping white voters registered.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the primary source excerpt to identify the goal and the constraint.
The goal is disenfranchisement of Black voters ('elimination of every Negro voter who can be gotten rid of'), and the constraint is the Federal Constitution ('limitations of the Federal Constitution', specifically the Fifteenth Amendment).
Understanding the source is crucial to determining what legal mechanism was designed to navigate this specific tension.
2
Evaluate the constitutional context of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
The Fifteenth Amendment forbids states from denying the right to vote based on race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
This establishes the legal boundary that Southern states had to bypass to accomplish their goal legally.
3
Determine which strategy allowed states to disenfranchise Black voters without explicitly violating the Fifteenth Amendment.
Southern states instituted mechanisms like literacy tests, understanding clauses, property requirements, and poll taxes. Since these laws did not explicitly use racial terms, they were facially neutral and thus survived early constitutional challenges, despite being designed and administered to target Black voters.
This directly links the historical strategy to the quote's description of discriminating to the 'extremity of permissible action' under the Constitution.

Key Concept

Facially Neutral Disenfranchisement Mechanisms
Rate this question

Topics

Jim Crow, Disenfranchisement, and Legal Segregation

More questions from this topic