Read the excerpt below from a 1669 Virginia colonial statute:
'WHEREAS the only law in force for the punishment of refractory servants... cannot be inflicted upon negroes, the obstinacy of many of them will not by other than violent means be supprest, Be it enacted and declared... if any slave resist his master (or others by his masters order correcting him) and by the extremity of the coaction should chance to die, that his death shall not be [considered] felony... since it cannot be presumed that prepensed malice (which alone makes murther felony) should induce any man to destroy his owne estate.'
Which of the following best describes the historical significance of this statute in the legal construction of chattel slavery?
- It legally defined enslaved individuals as property ('estate'), thereby removing standard criminal liability for masters who caused their deaths during punishment.Answer
- BIt established that conversion to Christianity would no longer release an enslaved person from lifelong servitude.
- CIt legally mandated that the social and legal status of newborn children would follow that of their mothers.
- DIt codified a uniform set of racial slave codes that immediately applied to all British North American colonies.
Answer
The statute legally defined enslaved individuals as property ('estate'), thereby removing standard criminal liability for masters who caused their deaths during punishment.
The correct answer is correct because the 1669 statute explicitly refers to the enslaved person as the master's 'owne estate' (property) and declares that a master cannot be charged with a felony for the death of their own property during correction, establishing a core legal foundation of chattel slavery.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
The property-based legal definition of enslaved people and the removal of criminal liability for masters in colonial slave codes.