[The following passage is from a nineteenth-century novel.]
While Sir Thomas debated the boundaries of his new estate with the surveyors,
marking out in cold iron and stone the margins of his inheritance, his cousin
Julian sat in the damp cottage of the tenant weaver, watching the slow,
cyclical rhythm of the loom. Thomas saw in the land a ledger of yields,
(5) a testament to his family’s ascending prominence; he calculated the value
of timber yet uncut and the rents of families he had never deigned to meet.
Meanwhile, Julian observed the weaver’s daughter as she mended a torn warp-thread.
She did not look up at the gentlemen, nor did she curse the cold that seeped
through the floorboards; she simply tied the knot with a practiced, indifferent
(10) precision. "A single broken thread," Julian remarked, more to himself than to the
girl, "and the whole pattern is compromised." The weaver, without pausing his
single shuttle, replied, "A thread is easily mended, sir, if one has the patience.
It is the loom itself that is rotting beneath us." Julian looked from the rotting
timber of the frame to the surveyor’s flags visible through the window, fluttering
(15) red against the gray hills, marking the progress of Thomas’s grand enclosure.
Which of the following best describes the relationship between the subplot in the weaver's cottage (lines 7–15) and the main plot of Sir Thomas's estate enclosure?
- AIt operates as a self-contained depiction of rural labor, illustrating the weaver's daughter's resilience independent of Sir Thomas's land disputes.
- BIt outlines the technical procedures of textile repair, detailing how the daughter mends the warp-thread to establish the timeline of the weaver's workday.
- It serves as a thematic critique of the main plot by contrasting Sir Thomas's cold imposition of ownership with the structural decay of the community supporting his wealth.Answer
- DIt introduces the weaver as a content character foil whose acceptance of poverty highlights Julian's growing resentment of his cousin's greed.
- EIt establishes a moral dichotomy between Julian and the weaver on one side, and Sir Thomas on the other, in a direct conflict over the ownership of the valley.