An audio recording features an exchange between two secondary school academic directors, Mariana and Fernando, regarding a proposed modification to senior evaluation methods:
Mariana: "We should completely replace our traditional final written examinations with community-based internship portfolios evaluated directly by local business and civic leaders."
Fernando: "While that sounds remarkably engaging on the surface, expecting thirty independent external supervisors to grade our seniors consistently without a standardized rubric is bound to create serious grading inequities."
What is Fernando's primary attitude toward Mariana's proposed change?
- AEnthusiastic about replacing traditional exams with experiential civic projects
- Apprehensive about the lack of assessment consistency and fairnessAnswer
- CFully supportive because he believes external supervisors will eliminate student stress
- DDismissive because he believes local civic leaders lack the professional competence to mentor students
Answer
Apprehensive about the lack of assessment consistency and fairness
The correct response accurately captures Fernando's apprehension regarding evaluation reliability. Although he politely acknowledges the appeal of the concept, his core argument emphasizes that having numerous external supervisors evaluate students without a uniform rubric will result in unfair and inconsistent grading.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Inferring Speaker Attitude and Tone in Spoken Conversations
Estimated Time:1m 15s