"A strike is the reservation of the right of the individual to say whether he will work or not... But when the federal government, with its judicial injunctions and military forces, sides with the corporate employers, the strike is no longer a contest between labor and capital. It becomes a contest between the citizen and the state itself."
— Adapted from Eugene V. Debs, testimony before the United States Strike Commission, 1894
Which of the following Gilded Age developments most directly contributed to the situation described in the excerpt?
- AThe strict adherence of the federal government to a laissez-faire policy that prevented any regulation or involvement in private economic conflicts
- The willingness of the federal government to intervene in labor disputes to protect corporate interests and ensure the flow of commerceAnswer
- CThe success of the urban Progressive movement in passing federal laws that prohibited strikes in key industries
- DThe decline of factory production as industrial workers returned to family-based agricultural labor
Answer
The willingness of the federal government to intervene in labor disputes to protect corporate interests and ensure the flow of commerce
The correct answer is correct because the Pullman Strike of 1894 demonstrated that the federal government was willing to use court injunctions (the judicial branch) and federal troops (the executive branch) to break strikes, siding with corporations to keep railroads running under the guise of protecting interstate commerce and mail delivery.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Federal intervention in Gilded Age labor disputes
Estimated Time:1m 30s