Read the following excerpt from the Report of the Chicago Strike Commission (1894):
"The force of the injunction was at once felt. It placed the federal courts in the position of active participants in the controversy, enforcing their decrees with the aid of the United States military. To the minds of many workingmen, this intervention by the federal government to protect the property and operations of the railroad companies... demonstrated that the power of the state was being wielded exclusively in the interest of capital."
Which Gilded Age concept is most directly challenged by the federal actions described in the excerpt?
- AThe belief that urban labor unions and rural Populists were united under a single, cohesive political platform.
- BThe view that federal policies in the late nineteenth century were designed to preserve communal land ownership.
- The concept that the federal government consistently adhered to laissez-faire economic principles.Answer
- DThe claim that the federal government only intervened in the economy to enforce safety regulations and protect workers' rights.
Answer
The concept that the federal government consistently adhered to laissez-faire economic principles.
The correct answer is correct because federal actions during Gilded Age conflicts—such as deploying federal troops and utilizing court injunctions to break the Pullman Strike of 1894—demonstrated that the federal government was willing to actively intervene in the economy to protect corporate interests. This directly contradicts the Gilded Age concept of laissez-faire, which advocated for a strictly hands-off approach by the government in economic matters.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Government intervention in Gilded Age labor disputes
Estimated Time:1m 30s