Senator Thomas Corwin, speech on the Mexican-American War, 1847:
"What is the territory, Mr. President, which you propose to wrest from Mexico? It is consecrated to the heart of the Mexican by many a battle... But you say you want room for your people. Have you not room enough? ... Go home, and admit that we have land enough, and let us cultivate what we have... Why should we go on a crusade of plunder to obtain more? ... Will you take this territory and hold it by the title of the sword, while you profess to be the great apostle of liberty?"
Which of the following best explains the primary objection of Whigs, such as Thomas Corwin, to the territorial expansion of the United States in the 1840s?
- AThey believed that expansionism violated the Monroe Doctrine by establishing new American colonies in the Western Hemisphere.
- They feared that acquiring new territories would inflame sectional tensions by reopening divisive debates over the extension of slavery.Answer
- CThey argued that the federal government lacked the constitutional authority under popular sovereignty to determine the slave status of new territories.
- DThey feared that expansion would lead to immediate tariff disputes with European trading partners, which they viewed as the primary cause of sectional division.
Answer
They feared that acquiring new territories would inflame sectional tensions by reopening divisive debates over the extension of slavery.
The Whig Party generally opposed the territorial expansion of the 1840s, especially the Mexican-American War, because they feared that acquiring new territory would reopen the divisive national debate over whether slavery should be permitted in new lands. This fear was realized with the introduction of the Wilmot Proviso and the subsequent sectional crises that led to the Compromise of 1850.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Whig opposition to Manifest Destiny and the connection between territorial expansion and sectional conflict over slavery.
Estimated Time:1m 30s