Source: Henry Demarest Lloyd, Wealth Against Commonwealth, 1894
"Nature is rich; but everywhere, under the dedicating operations of the trust and the monopoly, we see the production of the necessities of life restricted, prices artificially raised, and the independent producer driven to the wall. This consolidation of capital is not the natural result of free competition, but rather its destruction by means of secret railroad rebates and legislative privilege."
Which of the following historical developments during the late nineteenth century best supports Lloyd’s assertion regarding the role of "legislative privilege" in corporate consolidation?
- The federal government’s policy of granting public land subsidies and low-interest loans to transcontinental railroad companiesAnswer
- BThe federal government’s strict adherence to laissez-faire principles, which prevented any direct or indirect intervention in the market
- CThe implementation of mercantilist trade restrictions designed to limit domestic manufacturing in favor of raw material production
- DThe immediate and widespread use of the Sherman Antitrust Act by the executive branch to break up corporate monopolies in the 1890s
Answer
The federal government’s policy of granting public land subsidies and low-interest loans to transcontinental railroad companies
The correct answer is the option describing public land subsidies and loans because these legislative measures directly facilitated the expansion and consolidation of the transcontinental railroads, which in turn unified national markets and accelerated industrial growth. This directly supports Lloyd's argument that government-provided privileges, rather than natural market forces alone, shaped the rise of Gilded Age monopolies.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Government intervention and support for Gilded Age business consolidation
Estimated Time:1m 30s