"Great Britain possesses the posts... as a pledge for the debts due to her subjects, which she alleges are not paid, and for the treatment of the Loyalists, which she alleges is contrary to the treaty. The United States cannot deny that some infractions have been made on their part... because the treaty of peace was not sufficiently respected by all the states."
—John Jay, Report to Congress, 1786
Which of the following best explains why the national government under the Articles of Confederation was unable to resolve the issue described in the excerpt?
- ADemocratic-Republican lawmakers refused to allocate federal funds to pay British merchants due to their preference for a French alliance.
- BThe Articles of Confederation required the executive branch to gain approval from all thirteen states before deploying frontier militias.
- The national government lacked the power to enforce state compliance with international treaties or compel the payment of debts.Answer
- DThe national judiciary repeatedly ruled that federal treaties could not override state laws concerning loyalist properties.
Answer
The correct answer is that the national government lacked the power to enforce state compliance with international treaties or compel the payment of debts.
The correct answer is correct because the Articles of Confederation did not grant the national government the authority to compel state governments to comply with international treaties or collect taxes to pay debts. Because the states routinely ignored the terms of the Treaty of Paris (1783) regarding Loyalist compensation and British creditors, Great Britain had a diplomatic excuse to maintain military garrisons on the United States frontier, which restricted westward migration and supplied Native Americans in conflicts with American settlers.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation in foreign policy and frontier diplomacy
Estimated Time:1m 30s