Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardThe Constitutional Convention and Ratification Debates

Read the following excerpt from a speech delivered by Patrick Henry at the Virginia Ratifying Convention in June 1788:

"Who authorized them to speak the language of, We, the people, instead of, We, the states? States are the characteristics and the soul of a confederation. If the states be not the agents of this compact, it must be one great, consolidated, national government, of the people of all the states."

Which of the following arguments from the ratification debates most directly counters the concern expressed by Patrick Henry in this excerpt?

  1. The Federalist assertion that a national government deriving its power directly from the citizens was essential to bypass state-level factions and ensure a stable, lasting union.Answer
  2. B
    The nationalist contention that the Articles of Confederation had already established a highly centralized government that successfully managed interstate commerce and direct taxation.
  3. C
    The Democratic-Republican argument that a national bank and loose construction of the Constitution were required to unify state economies under federal authority.
  4. D
    The proposal that state sovereignty should be modeled on the direct representation principles and colonial alliances developed during the Stamp Act Congress.

Answer

The Federalist assertion that a national government deriving its power directly from the citizens was essential to bypass state-level factions and ensure a stable, lasting union.
The correct answer is the statement that Federalists asserted a national government deriving its power directly from citizens was essential to bypass state-level factions and ensure a stable union. Federalists, such as James Madison in the Federalist Papers, argued that the national government must operate directly on individuals (popular sovereignty) rather than through the mediation of state legislatures, in order to address the fatal weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and protect the republic from local factions.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the stimulus text.
Patrick Henry is arguing from an Anti-Federalist perspective, asserting that the Constitution's opening phrase 'We, the people' improperly creates a consolidated national government that diminishes the sovereignty of the individual states.
Understanding the source's historical context and key argument is necessary to identify the opposing Federalist position.
2
Identify the core debate represented in the text.
The debate is between the Anti-Federalist compact theory (which viewed the union as a league of sovereign states) and the Federalist concept of popular sovereignty (which viewed the national government as representing the people directly).
This allows the student to link the stimulus to the broader debates over federalism and representation during the ratification period.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the argument that directly counters Henry's view.
The argument that the national government must derive its power directly from the citizens to ensure stability and bypass state factions directly counters Henry's insistence on a confederation of states.
Selecting the option that aligns with the Federalist defense of popular sovereignty and the 'We, the people' framing.

Key Concept

Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist arguments regarding sovereignty, representation, and the structure of the union during the ratification debates.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question

Topics

The Constitutional Convention and Ratification Debates

More questions from this topic