"We are told that this annexation [of Texas] will extend and perpetuate slavery. The very reverse is the fact... Texas is the only safety-valve... If Texas is annexed, she will drag the whole slave population of the South and South-west in that direction... By this process, the slave population will slide of itself, by the laws of gravity, out of the Union into Mexico and Central America, where the slave will become a free laborer, and the negro race be merged and lost in the population of those countries."
— Robert J. Walker, letter on the annexation of Texas, 1844
Which of the following historical developments during the 1840s most directly challenged the argument presented in the excerpt?
- AThe successful pacification of the territorial slavery debate through the application of popular sovereignty in new Western lands
- The rapid intensification of sectional conflict over the expansion of slavery into territories acquired from MexicoAnswer
- CThe emergence of federal tariff policies as the primary driver of Southern secession threats during the late 1840s
- DThe interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine as an active military alliance between the United States and Mexico
Answer
The rapid intensification of sectional conflict over the expansion of slavery into territories acquired from Mexico
The correct option is correct because the annexation of Texas in 1845 and the subsequent Mexican-American War led to the acquisition of vast new territories (the Mexican Cession). Rather than allowing slavery to peacefully disperse and dissolve as Walker argued, this westward expansion immediately reignited intense sectional disputes over whether slavery would be permitted in the new territories, as seen in the Wilmot Proviso debates and the Compromise of 1850.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
The ideological justifications for Manifest Destiny and the subsequent sectional conflicts over the expansion of slavery in the West.
Estimated Time:2m 0s