"I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground: That 'all powers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States or to the people.' To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition. The incorporation of a bank, and the powers assumed by this bill, have not, in my opinion, been delegated to the United States, by the Constitution."
—Thomas Jefferson, Opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank, 1791
Which of the following disputes in the early United States is most directly reflected in this excerpt?
- The debate over whether the federal government possessed implied powers under the ConstitutionAnswer
- BThe conflict over whether the national government should replace the Articles of Confederation with a new constitution
- CThe disagreement over whether the United States should support France or Great Britain in their foreign war
- DThe controversy over whether to establish a permanent standing national military during peacetime
Answer
The debate over whether the federal government possessed implied powers under the Constitution
The correct answer is correct because Thomas Jefferson's strict interpretation of the Constitution, emphasizing that only delegated powers belong to the federal government, was the foundation of the opposition to Alexander Hamilton's national bank, directly highlighting the debate over loose versus strict construction and the scope of federal power.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Strict versus Loose Interpretation of the Constitution