Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumJackson and Federal Power Conflicts

"If the opinion of the Supreme Court covered the whole ground of this act, it ought not to control the coordinate authorities of this Government. The Congress, the Executive, and the Court must each for itself be guided by its own opinion of the Constitution. Each public officer who takes an oath to support the Constitution swears that he will support it as he understands it, and not as it is understood by others. . . . The opinion of the judges has no more authority over Congress than the opinion of Congress has over the judges, and on that point the President is independent of both."

—President Andrew Jackson, Message Vetoing the Recharter of the Second Bank of the United States, 1832

The views expressed in the excerpt represent a direct challenge to which of the following constitutional principles established during the Marshall Court?

  1. The Supreme Court is the final arbiter of constitutionality, whose rulings are binding on the other branches of the federal government.Answer
  2. B
    The Supreme Court holds the constitutional power to directly enforce its rulings regardless of executive approval.
  3. C
    State courts have concurrent jurisdiction with the Supreme Court over constitutional disputes regarding federal charters.
  4. D
    The federal government's authority over national trade is limited to interstate commerce directly altered by the Market Revolution.

Answer

The Supreme Court is the final arbiter of constitutionality, whose rulings are binding on the other branches of the federal government.
The correct answer is that Jackson is challenging the principle that the Supreme Court is the final arbiter of constitutionality, whose rulings bind the coordinate branches of government. In the excerpt, Jackson rejects judicial supremacy, arguing instead that the executive and legislative branches have equal, coordinate authority to interpret the Constitution for themselves.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the provided historical source.
The document is Andrew Jackson's 1832 Bank Veto Message, specifically a passage where he argues that the President and Congress are independent of the Supreme Court's constitutional interpretations.
Understanding the source's main argument is necessary to identify what constitutional principle it challenges.
2
Recall Marshall Court principles related to judicial authority.
The Marshall Court established the principle of judicial review and judicial supremacy (most notably in Marbury v. Madison), stating that the Supreme Court has the ultimate authority to interpret the Constitution and that its rulings are binding.
This allows comparison between Jackson's claims and established judicial principles.
3
Compare Jackson's claims with the recalled principles to identify the challenged concept.
Jackson asserts that the Executive and Congress 'must each for itself be guided by its own opinion of the Constitution,' which directly denies that the Supreme Court is the final, binding arbiter of constitutionality for the other branches.
This confirms the correct option that matches the challenge described in the stem.

Key Concept

Jackson's presidency challenged the established authority of the Supreme Court and the principle of judicial supremacy by asserting coordinate branch independence in constitutional interpretation.
Rate this question

Topics

Jackson and Federal Power Conflicts

More questions from this topic