Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumFederalist No. 10 vs. Brutus No. 1

In the debate over the size and scope of the proposed national government under the Constitution, authors of the Federalist Papers and Anti-Federalist essays clashed over the concept of representation. How do the arguments in Federalist No. 10 and Brutus No. 1 differ regarding the relationship between representatives and the citizens they serve?

  1. Federalist No. 10 argues that representatives in a large republic will refine and enlarge public views to serve the collective good, whereas Brutus No. 1 contends that representatives in a large republic will become detached from their constituents and pursue their own interests.Answer
  2. B
    Federalist No. 10 contends that representatives must remain physically close to their constituents to prevent corruption, whereas Brutus No. 1 asserts that a larger territory makes it easier for voters to hold representatives accountable.
  3. C
    Federalist No. 10 advocates for a participatory model where citizens directly vote on all policies, whereas Brutus No. 1 supports an elite model where a small group of wealthy citizens make decisions for the nation.
  4. D
    Federalist No. 10 argues that state governments should retain sovereign power over representation, whereas Brutus No. 1 maintains that the federal government must have supreme authority over local districts.

Answer

Federalist No. 10 argues that representatives in a large republic will refine and enlarge public views to serve the collective good, whereas Brutus No. 1 contends that representatives in a large republic will become detached from their constituents and pursue their own interests.
The correct answer accurately contrasts the two perspectives. In Federalist No. 10, Madison asserts that a larger republic will produce representatives who filter and refine the views of the citizenry to promote the national public good. In contrast, Brutus No. 1 warns that a large republic will distance representatives from their constituents, preventing them from understanding the public will and leading them to favor their own interests.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the position of Federalist No. 10 on representation.
James Madison argues that in a large republic, a representative body serves to refine and enlarge public views by passing them through a chosen body of citizens, acting as a filter against temporary passions and factions.
To understand the Federalist perspective on how representatives interact with their constituents.
2
Analyze the position of Brutus No. 1 on representation.
The Anti-Federalist author warns that in a large, extended republic, representatives will be too far removed from their constituents, making it impossible for them to truly know or represent the will of the people, leading to a detached and self-serving ruling class.
To understand the Anti-Federalist critique of national representation.
3
Compare and select the option that accurately contrasts these positions.
The correct answer accurately contrasts the Federalist belief in representation as a filtering mechanism for the public good with the Anti-Federalist fear of detached representatives abusing their power.
To align the analyzed arguments with the correct comparative statement.

Key Concept

Federalist No. 10 vs. Brutus No. 1
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question

Topics

Federalist No. 10 vs. Brutus No. 1

More questions from this topic