Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumFederalist No. 10 vs. Brutus No. 1

During the ratification debates, Federalists and Anti-Federalists held deeply contrasting views on the nature of representation and the accountability of elected officials. Which of the following statements best contrasts the arguments in Federalist No. 10 and Brutus No. 1 regarding the relationship between citizens and their representatives?

  1. A
    Federalist No. 10 argues that a large republic will result in representatives who are distant and easily corrupted by elite interests, while Brutus No. 1 asserts that a large republic ensures that representatives are highly accountable due to the diversity of the electorate.
  2. B
    Federalist No. 10 advocates for a participatory model of democracy where representatives must vote exactly as their local constituents demand, while Brutus No. 1 promotes an elite model where representatives make decisions independent of public opinion.
  3. Federalist No. 10 argues that a large republic selects representatives whose wisdom and virtue will refine and enlarge the public views, while Brutus No. 1 contends that representatives in a large republic will soon become detached from their constituents and abuse their power.Answer
  4. D
    Federalist No. 10 claims that the Articles of Confederation failed because the national government could not draft soldiers, while Brutus No. 1 argues that the new Constitution preserves sovereign state militias to protect civil liberties.

Answer

Federalist No. 10 argues that a large republic selects representatives whose wisdom and virtue will refine and enlarge the public views, while Brutus No. 1 contends that representatives in a large republic will soon become detached from their constituents and abuse their power.
The correct option captures the main debate over representation between Federalist No. 10 and Brutus No. 1. Madison (Federalist No. 10) believed that a larger republic would refine and enlarge the public views by electing representatives of high character, whereas the author of Brutus No. 1 feared that in a large republic, the representatives would be detached from the people, leading to corruption and tyranny.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core argument of Federalist No. 10 regarding representation.
In Federalist No. 10, James Madison argues that a large republic is superior because it leads to a larger pool of potential representatives and a larger electorate, which makes it more likely that representatives of high character, wisdom, and virtue will be chosen to 'refine and enlarge the public views.'
Understanding the Federalist perspective on how the size of the republic filters factionalism and improves quality of governance.
2
Analyze the core argument of Brutus No. 1 regarding representation.
In Brutus No. 1, the Anti-Federalist author warns that in a large republic, the representatives will be too far removed from their constituents, will not know their minds, and will soon become independent of their control, leading to self-serving governance and abuse of power.
Understanding the Anti-Federalist perspective on the dangers of a large republic and the necessity of keeping representation local and familiar.
3
Compare the two arguments to identify the option that accurately contrasts them.
The statement contrasting Madison's belief in representation filtering public views with Brutus's warning about detached representatives abusing power is the correct comparison.
Selecting the option that correctly represents both sides of the constitutional debate on representation.

Key Concept

Debate over representation and republic size in Federalist No. 10 and Brutus No. 1
Rate this question

Topics

Federalist No. 10 vs. Brutus No. 1

More questions from this topic