Members of a national professional association in Australia are deeply divided over a proposed change to their code of ethics. Despite extensive consultation, the group remains unable to reach a consensus. In this situation, which of the following actions best exemplifies the Australian value of 'Peaceful Disagreement'?
- Participating in structured, respectful debates and using the democratic voting process to decide the matter, while acknowledging the right of others to maintain their contrary views.Answer
- BOrganizing a campaign to formally censor and remove members who hold opposing views to ensure the association can present a single, unified stance to the public.
- CEngaging in aggressive verbal confrontation and personal shaming during meetings to make those with opposing views feel too uncomfortable to continue their advocacy.
Answer
Participating in structured, respectful debates and using the democratic voting process to decide the matter, while acknowledging the right of others to maintain their contrary views.
The correct answer demonstrates 'Peaceful Disagreement' by focusing on the process of respectful debate and the use of democratic systems (like voting) to resolve issues. It emphasizes that even when a final decision is made, the right of others to hold their own opinions must still be acknowledged and respected.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
The principle of Peaceful Disagreement allows for the expression of diverse opinions through respectful and lawful channels while rejecting all forms of intimidation and the silencing of dissent.
Hints
1
Consider which action allows everyone to keep their own opinion even if they don't agree with the final outcome.
2
Australian values reject any method of resolving conflict that relies on 'shutting down' the other side through force or fear.
Practice More
Review the section on 'Democratic Beliefs' to see how freedom of speech and the rule of law support the principle of peaceful disagreement.
Estimated Time:1m 30s