A system administrator is installing drives into a specialized workstation motherboard. The motherboard documentation specifies that the primary slot (M2_1) is M-key only and connected exclusively to four PCIe 4.0 lanes without SATA controller routing. The secondary slot (M2_2) is B-key only and connected to two PCIe 3.0 lanes and a SATA III controller. The administrator attempts to install a B&M-keyed M.2 SATA SSD into slot M2_1 and a standard M-keyed M.2 PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD into slot M2_2. Which of the following describes the physical compatibility and operational result of this installation?
- The B&M-keyed SATA SSD physically fits into slot M2_1 but will not be recognized by the system firmware, while the M-keyed NVMe SSD cannot physically insert into slot M2_2.Answer
- BBoth SSDs physically fit into their respective slots, but the SATA SSD runs in AHCI mode while the NVMe SSD is throttled down to PCIe 3.0 x2 speed.
- CNeither drive physically fits into either slot due to keying protection mechanisms designed to prevent electrical damage.
- DThe B&M-keyed SATA SSD operates normally in slot M2_1 by using PCIe lane emulation, but the M-keyed NVMe drive in slot M2_2 causes a POST beep error.
Answer
The B&M-keyed SATA SSD physically fits into slot M2_1 but will not be recognized by the system firmware, while the M-keyed NVMe SSD cannot physically insert into slot M2_2.
The correct option identifies both physical keying rules and logical bus routing constraints. A B&M-keyed drive has dual cutouts, enabling physical insertion into an M-key slot; however, because slot M2_1 lacks SATA traces, the drive receives power but cannot communicate with the system. An M-key drive has a single gap at pins 59-66, which physically prevents insertion into a B-key slot with a ridge at pins 12-19.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
M.2 Physical Keying vs. Electrical Bus Routing Compatibility
Estimated Time:2m 0s