A lead security analyst is designing a vulnerability assessment strategy for an operational technology segment that hosts legacy embedded web services. Previous active credentialed vulnerability scans caused several legacy daemons to crash, resulting in unexpected system downtime. The analyst must establish continuous monitoring to identify unpatched vulnerabilities and service misconfigurations across this segment without transmitting synthetic packets that could disrupt host stability. Which of the following security assessment methods best fulfills these operational requirements?
- Implementing a passive network vulnerability scanner that inspects mirrored traffic from a SPAN port to identify software versions and potential security flaws.Answer
- BDeploying high-interaction honeypots inline between network switches to automatically filter out exploit payloads directed at the legacy services.
- CConfiguring a web application firewall to perform scheduled configuration compliance audits on internal host file systems.
- DScheduling aggressive unauthenticated TCP SYN port scans during non-peak maintenance windows with elevated packet transmission rates.
Answer
Implementing a passive network vulnerability scanner using mirrored network traffic (SPAN/TAP) provides continuous vulnerability assessment without injecting network probes or risking system crashes on fragile legacy devices.
Passive network vulnerability assessment inspects mirrored network traffic via SPAN/mirror ports or hardware TAPs. Because it captures and analyzes existing traffic without generating or injecting new packets into the network, it accurately identifies open ports, host OS signatures, and software vulnerabilities without risking service disruption or system crashes on sensitive legacy daemons.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Passive vs. Active Vulnerability Assessment Methods
Estimated Time:1m 30s