An enterprise security team is defining enterprise hardening requirements for a fleet of Linux-based edge compute gateways deployed at remote industrial facilities. A recent security audit highlighted two critical vulnerabilities: field technicians currently perform local configuration updates using a shared administrative account, and automated firmware updates are downloaded over unencrypted channels without integrity verification. Which TWO of the following mitigation controls should the team implement to directly address these findings?
- Enforce SSH public key authentication linked to unique identity provider accounts and disable interactive password logins for administrative accounts.Answer
- Configure hardware-backed Trusted Platform Module (TPM) chips to cryptographically verify firmware digital signatures prior to installation.Answer
- CDeploy inline network intrusion prevention systems (NIPS) on local management VLANs to automatically scrub malicious payloads from firmware binaries during transit.
- DConfigure edge perimeter firewalls to automatically trust and grant administrative access to all incoming traffic originating from the internal corporate network segment.
Answer
The team should enforce SSH public key authentication linked to unique identity provider accounts while disabling interactive password logins, and configure hardware-backed Trusted Platform Module (TPM) chips to cryptographically verify firmware digital signatures prior to installation.
The correct controls directly resolve both audit findings. Enforcing individual SSH public keys tied to unique identity accounts eliminates shared credential usage and establishes full accountability. Hardware-backed TPM verification checks the digital signature of firmware binaries before execution, ensuring code authenticity regardless of the transit path.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Mitigation Strategies and Enterprise Hardening Practices