Examkin

Question

Difficulty: EasyStructural Integration of Counterarguments & Rebuttals

Consider the following draft body paragraph from an essay responding to a GRE Issue prompt on municipal governance:

"Municipalities should prioritize reserving vacant downtown lots for public parks rather than selling them for commercial development. Opponents might argue that commercial developments generate immediate property tax revenues necessary to fund municipal services. However, this perspective overlooks the fact that public parks increase neighboring property values over time, thereby indirectly expanding the tax base while simultaneously improving community health."

Which of the following statements accurately describe the structural integration of the counterargument and rebuttal in this excerpt? (Select all that apply.)

  1. The paragraph introduces an opposing perspective using a clear transition to distinguish the counterargument from the author's primary position.Answer
  2. The rebuttal directly responds to the central premise of the counterargument by offering an alternative economic reasoning.Answer
  3. C
    The paragraph places the counterargument in complete isolation from the main line of reasoning, creating a structural disconnect.
  4. D
    The author dismisses the opposing viewpoint superficially without offering substantive counter-reasoning or evidence.
  5. E
    The excerpt exhibits a one-sided line of reasoning that fails to acknowledge potential objections to the author's thesis.

Answer

The statements recognizing the clear transitional introduction of the opposing perspective and the direct economic engagement of the rebuttal are both correct.
The paragraph successfully integrates the counterargument by first signaling it with clear transitional phrasing ('Opponents might argue that...') and then directly countering its economic premise regarding tax revenues with a logical counter-explanation ('public parks increase neighboring property values over time, thereby indirectly expanding the tax base').

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze how the counterargument is introduced within the paragraph structure.
The author uses 'Opponents might argue that...' to explicitly signal a shift from the main claim to an opposing viewpoint.
Clear transitional framing ensures the reader distinguishes between the author's core thesis and alternative perspectives.
2
Evaluate the structural and logical connection between the counterargument and the rebuttal.
The author transitions with 'However' and refutes the tax revenue concern by demonstrating an alternative, long-term economic mechanism (property value appreciation).
An effective rebuttal must engage directly with the premise of the counterargument rather than shifting to an unrelated topic.

Key Concept

Effective structural integration requires clear transitional signaling of opposing claims followed by a direct, logically aligned rebuttal.
Rate this question

Topics

Structural Integration of Counterarguments & Rebuttals

More questions from this topic