Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardStructural Integration of Counterarguments & Rebuttals

A writer drafting an essay for a GRE Issue prompt regarding government regulation of artificial intelligence produces the following body paragraph excerpt:

"Proponents of stringent artificial intelligence safety regulations argue that unsupervised autonomous systems pose existential risks to employment markets and civil security. While this concern highlights potential long-term disruptions, regulators must acknowledge that heavy-handed oversight will inevitably suffocate domestic technological innovation. Beyond economic drawbacks, government agencies lack the technical expertise required to evaluate cutting-edge neural architectures in real time. Thus, free-market competition remains the only viable mechanism for fostering algorithmic safety."

Which of the following statements accurately describe structural integration defects present in the author's handling of the counterargument and rebuttal? Select all that apply.

  1. The counterargument is superficially acknowledged in a subordinate clause but dismissed without a substantive, evidence-based refutation of its core premise.Answer
  2. B
    The paragraph lacks transitional phrases, causing an ungrammatical and abrupt shift between sentences.
  3. The counterargument is positioned as an isolated introductory assertion that is structurally decoupled from the subsequent line of reasoning.Answer
  4. D
    The author commits an absolutist fallacy by asserting that regulatory intervention has failed in every historical technological domain.
  5. E
    The author fails to uncover unstated statistical assumptions embedded within the opposing argument's survey data.

Answer

The structural integration defects present in the excerpt are: (1) the opposing perspective is superficially acknowledged and dismissed without substantive rebuttal to its central premise, and (2) the counterargument functions as an isolated introductory assertion decoupled from the rest of the paragraph's logical development.
The paragraph demonstrates two primary structural integration flaws. First, the option stating that the counterargument is superficially acknowledged and dismissed without substantive refutation is correct because the author brushes off existential risks with a brief dependent clause before shifting entirely to independent arguments about innovation and agency technical limits. Second, the option describing the counterargument as an isolated introductory assertion decoupled from the subsequent line of reasoning is correct because the opening claim about market and security threats is never integrated into or resolved by the remaining body sentences.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze how the counterargument is introduced and connected to the thesis.
The paragraph begins by introducing an opposing view ('Proponents... argue that unsupervised autonomous systems pose existential risks...'). However, this statement serves as a isolated placeholder rather than an integrated component of a dialectical argument.
Effective AWA paragraph structure requires that counterarguments be meaningfully integrated into the line of reasoning rather than tacked on.
2
Evaluate the pivot and rebuttal mechanism following the concession.
The author transitions using 'While this concern highlights potential long-term disruptions...', but immediately pivots to unrelated points regarding economic stagnation and agency incompetence without addressing why existential security risks are invalid or outweighed.
Dismissing a counterargument superficially without engaging its core evidence or logic creates a weak, one-sided structural integration flaw.
3
Identify matching defect descriptions among the choices.
The options identifying superficial dismissal without substantive refutation and describing the counterargument as an isolated, decoupled assertion correctly characterize these structural deficiencies.
Both descriptions pinpoint empirical structural flaws in the excerpt's argument architecture.

Key Concept

Structural Integration of Counterarguments & Rebuttals
Estimated Time:2m 30s
Rate this question

Topics

Structural Integration of Counterarguments & Rebuttals

More questions from this topic