Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardStrengthening Arguments

Linguists analyzing the evolution of early writing systems hypothesized that the shift from pictographic symbols to abstract phonographic scripts was driven primarily by the economic necessity of recording complex trade transactions quickly. As commercial networks expanded across ancient Mesopotamia, scribes required symbols that could be impressed rapidly into clay rather than detailed pictorial representations. Therefore, researchers concluded that trade volume, rather than religious ritual or administrative governance, was the sole catalyst for script abstraction.

Which of the following statements, if true, provide support for the researchers' conclusion regarding the primary driver of script abstraction? Select all that apply.

  1. In ancient regions where religious temples managed resource distribution without long-distance commercial trade, pictographic scripts remained unabstracted for centuries longer than in active commercial hubs.Answer
  2. B
    Administrative records from city-states with minimal merchant activity show a sudden transition to abstract phonographic scripts immediately following centralized bureaucratic reforms.
  3. Archival clay tablets reveal that the speed required to impress abstract phonographic symbols was significantly higher than that for detailed pictographs, allowing scribes to complete a higher volume of transaction records per day.Answer
  4. D
    Ancient scribes underwent rigorous apprenticeship programs lasting several years in order to master both pictographic and phonographic writing systems.
  5. E
    The total number of surviving clay tablets featuring pictographic script is roughly equal to the total number of surviving tablets featuring abstract phonographic script.

Answer

The argument is strengthened by the statements establishing that script abstraction failed to occur in non-commercial temple settings and that abstract symbols provided a measurable speed advantage for recording trade transactions.
The conclusion asserts that trade volume was the primary driver of script abstraction, as opposed to religious or administrative factors. The statement observing that pictographic scripts remained unabstracted in non-commercial temple environments supports the argument by demonstrating that non-trade factors were insufficient on their own to cause abstraction. Additionally, the statement confirming that abstract symbols significantly increased scribal recording speed provides empirical backing for the premise that the shift was motivated by the need for rapid trade recordkeeping.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the core premises and conclusion of the argument.
Premise: Expanding Mesopotamian trade networks created a need to record transactions quickly in clay. Conclusion: Trade volume, rather than religious ritual or administrative governance, was the sole catalyst for script abstraction.
To evaluate strengthening factors, one must isolate the exact conclusion and the proposed causal mechanism.
2
Evaluate statements that eliminate alternative causes or validate core assumptions.
The statement regarding religious temples demonstrates that without commercial trade, non-trade governance did not trigger abstraction (eliminating an alternative cause). The statement regarding scribal speed verifies that abstract scripts actually satisfied the operational need for faster trade recordkeeping.
Ruling out alternative causes and confirming underlying operational mechanisms logically increases the probability that the author's conclusion is correct.
3
Eliminate choices that weaken the argument or introduce irrelevant background details.
The statement showing administrative reforms causing abstraction weakens the argument by introducing a counter-example. The statements regarding apprenticeship length and surviving tablet counts are out of scope or fail to address causality.
Options that undermine the conclusion or present neutral facts do not provide support.

Key Concept

Strengthening Causal Arguments by Ruling Out Alternative Causes and Validating Implicit Assumptions
Rate this question

Topics

Strengthening Arguments

More questions from this topic