Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardSignatures and Application Changes

Producer Jenkins is writing a life insurance policy where Sarah is the applicant and policyowner, applying for coverage on the life of her husband, Mark. Both Sarah and Mark sign their required sections as applicant and proposed insured, respectively. However, they inadvertently leave a question regarding Mark's cardiovascular history completely blank.

After leaving the clients, Jenkins reviews the paperwork and notices Sarah accidentally checked 'Yes' for a hazardous aviation hobby. Jenkins calls Sarah, receives her verbal authorization over the phone to correct the error, crosses out 'Yes', checks 'No', and writes his own initials next to the change. Jenkins then submits the application.

The insurer's underwriting department fails to notice the blank medical question and formally issues the policy.

Based on application protocols and insurance contract law, which of the following accurately describes the legal and regulatory status of this transaction?

  1. The insurer waived its right to contest the blank medical question by issuing the policy, but the producer violated regulations by altering the aviation answer without the applicant's physical initials.Answer
  2. B
    The producer legally amended the aviation question because verbal authorization is sufficient for non-medical changes, but the insurer can void the policy later due to the blank cardiovascular question.
  3. C
    The issued policy is void from inception because an application with unanswered medical questions cannot form a legally binding contract, regardless of the insurer's issuance.
  4. D
    The producer acted within his implied authority by initialing the correction on behalf of the applicant, and the insurer's issuance legally binds all parties to both changes.

Answer

The insurer waived its right to contest the blank medical question by issuing the policy, but the producer violated regulations by altering the aviation answer without the applicant's physical initials.
The correct answer identifies two distinct principles: the doctrine of waiver, and strict application change protocols. When an insurer accepts an incomplete application and issues a policy, it legally waives its right to demand the missing information or use it to deny a claim later. However, regarding the alteration made by the producer, insurance regulations strictly prohibit producers from unilaterally changing an application or signing/initialing on behalf of an applicant. Even with verbal consent, the applicant must physically initial any corrections to acknowledge the change.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the consequence of the missing information on the submitted application.
The insurer issued the policy despite the blank cardiovascular question.
Under the legal doctrine of waiver, accepting an incomplete application means the insurer voluntarily relinquishes the right to demand that information or use it to deny a future claim.
2
Evaluate the legality of the application change made by the producer.
The producer obtained verbal consent and initialed the change himself, which is a regulatory violation.
Insurance regulations strictly require the applicant to physically initial any changes made to an application; producers cannot initial on their behalf, even with verbal permission.
3
Synthesize the outcomes to determine the overall status of the transaction.
The policy is legally binding due to the insurer's waiver, but the producer is subject to disciplinary action for the unauthorized alteration.
This accurately reflects both contract law principles and strict application protocols.

Key Concept

Signatures and Application Changes
Rate this question

Topics

Signatures and Application Changes

More questions from this topic