Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumRepresentations, Warranties, and Concealment

During the underwriting process for a life insurance policy, an applicant intentionally answers "No" to a question asking if they have been treated for a heart condition, despite having suffered a mild heart attack two years prior. The insurer relies on this application and issues the policy.

Which of the following best describes the legal nature of this false statement and its consequence?

  1. It is a material misrepresentation, which gives the insurer the right to rescind the policy because the true facts would have changed the underwriting decision.Answer
  2. B
    It is a breach of warranty, because state insurance regulations classify all applicant answers on a life insurance application as absolute warranties.
  3. C
    It is an administrative discrepancy that the producer is legally authorized to unilaterally correct on the application without the applicant's signature.
  4. D
    It triggers the doctrine of estoppel, preventing the insurer from contesting the policy because they voluntarily waived their right to investigate prior to issuance.

Answer

It is a material misrepresentation, which gives the insurer the right to rescind the policy because the true facts would have changed the underwriting decision.
The correct answer accurately identifies the applicant's action as a material misrepresentation. In insurance law, statements on an application are representations. If a representation is intentionally false and material (meaning it affects the insurer's decision to issue the policy or the premium rate), the insurer has the legal right to rescind the contract.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the nature of the applicant's statement.
The applicant made a false statement by denying a previous heart attack.
Determining whether the statement was false or omitted is the first step in contract analysis.
2
Determine the legal classification of statements on an insurance application.
Statements on an application are legally considered representations, not warranties.
This distinction determines how strictly the truth of the statement is enforced by the courts.
3
Evaluate the materiality of the false representation.
A prior heart attack is highly relevant to life insurance underwriting. Therefore, the misrepresentation is material.
An insurer can only void a policy for a misrepresentation if the false statement was material to accepting the risk.
4
Conclude the legal consequence for the insurer.
The insurer has the right to rescind the policy.
Because the representation was both false and material, the insurer is not bound by the contract.

Key Concept

Representations are statements believed to be true. If an applicant makes a false representation that is material to the risk, the insurer has the right to void the contract.
Rate this question

Topics

Representations, Warranties, and Concealment

More questions from this topic