Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardRepresentations, Warranties, and Concealment

During a life insurance application process, an applicant is asked if he has ever been treated for hypertension. The applicant answers "no," genuinely believing this to be true because his doctor prescribed a mild diuretic for "water retention" without explicitly diagnosing hypertension or explaining the underlying condition. The policy is issued based on this application. A year later, the insured dies from a stroke, and the insurer discovers during the claim investigation that the prescribed medication was actually a standard treatment for high blood pressure. The insurer attempts to void the contract, arguing the applicant's statement was false. Under general insurance contract law, which of the following describes the most likely legal outcome?

  1. The insurer must pay the claim because the applicant's statement was a representation, which only requires the answer to be true to the best of his knowledge and belief.Answer
  2. B
    The insurer can void the contract because all statements on a life insurance application are legally considered warranties, meaning any factual inaccuracy automatically breaches the contract.
  3. C
    The insurer can void the contract because insurance policies are contracts of adhesion, meaning any ambiguity in the applicant's answers is interpreted strictly in favor of the insurer.
  4. D
    The insurer is legally estopped from voiding the policy because they waived their right to contest the claim by not requiring an independent medical examination before issuance.

Answer

The insurer must pay the claim because the applicant's statement was a representation, which only requires the answer to be true to the best of his knowledge and belief.
The correct answer accurately applies the legal doctrine of representations. In insurance law, answers to application questions are representations (statements believed to be true to the best of the applicant's knowledge), not warranties (absolute guarantees of truth). Because the applicant was never explicitly diagnosed and genuinely did not know he had hypertension, his answer was true to the best of his knowledge, obligating the insurer to pay the claim.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the nature of the applicant's statement.
The applicant answered 'no' based on his genuine understanding of his medical condition, making it an innocent misstatement rather than an intentional lie.
Determining the applicant's intent and knowledge is crucial for evaluating potential misrepresentations or concealment in insurance applications.
2
Identify the legal standard applied to application statements.
Unless specifically stated otherwise in the contract, statements made by an applicant on an insurance application are considered representations, not warranties.
Representations are statements believed to be true to the best of the applicant's knowledge and belief, whereas warranties must be absolutely and factually true.
3
Evaluate the insurer's grounds for voiding the contract based on the legal standard.
Since the statement was a representation and the applicant answered honestly to the best of his knowledge, there was no breach of warranty or intentional concealment.
An innocent misrepresentation of a fact completely unknown to the applicant does not provide legal grounds for an insurer to void a life insurance policy.

Key Concept

Representations vs. Warranties
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question

Topics

Representations, Warranties, and Concealment

More questions from this topic