A business owner applies for a commercial policy that would pay out $100,000 if the market value of their company's newly issued stock decreases over the next fiscal year. The insurance company rejects the application. Based on the elements of an insurable risk, which of the following best explains why this coverage was declined?
- The scenario involves a speculative risk, whereas insurers require a pure risk.Answer
- BThe situation presents a pure risk, but the financial loss cannot be definitively measured.
- CThe potential decrease in stock value is classified as a physical hazard rather than a covered peril.
- DThe business owner is attempting to practice risk retention instead of risk transfer.
Answer
The scenario involves a speculative risk, whereas insurers require a pure risk.
Insurance principles dictate that only pure risks—situations where there is only a chance of loss or no loss—are insurable. The scenario describes an investment in the stock market, which is a speculative risk because it involves the potential for financial gain if the stock value increases. Therefore, it violates a primary element of an insurable risk.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Pure vs. Speculative Risk