A botanist repeatedly prunes a species of shrub over its lifetime, causing it to develop a compact, stunted growth form. When seeds harvested from this pruned shrub are grown under normal, unpruned conditions, all offspring develop into full-sized plants of standard height. Which of the following conclusions best refutes Lamarck's theory of evolution based on this result?
- Acquired somatic modifications resulting from environmental manipulation are not transferred to gametes or inherited by offspring.Answer
- BEnvironmental stress directly induces genetic mutations that suppress growth only when pruning is actively maintained.
- CDisuse of growth hormones during pruning causes permanent organ atrophy that is counteracted by natural selection in the offspring.
- DNatural selection favors full-sized phenotypes only when soil nutrients exceed the threshold required for stunted growth.
Answer
Acquired somatic modifications resulting from environmental manipulation are not transferred to gametes or inherited by offspring.
Lamarck's theory of evolution proposed that organisms pass on physical features acquired during their lifetime to their offspring (inheritance of acquired characteristics). The experiment demonstrates that pruning—an environmentally induced somatic change—does not alter the genetic code in the plant's reproductive cells (germline). Consequently, the offspring inherit the unedited genetic instructions for normal growth, refuting Lamarck's proposed mechanism.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Inheritance of Acquired Characteristics vs. Somatic and Germline Differentiation
Estimated Time:1m 30s