Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardReinsurance, Co-insurance, and Underwriting Concepts

Sovereign Industries Ltd insured its manufacturing complex against fire risk under a policy jointly underwritten by Firm P (60% share) and Firm Q (40% share). To guard against catastrophic loss, Firm P reinsured 50% of its assumed risk with Firm R. Following a fire that caused N500 million\text{N}500\text{ million} in damages, Sovereign Industries submitted a claim directly to Firm R for N150 million\text{N}150\text{ million}. Which statement accurately describes the legal rights of the insured and the financial liability of Firm P?

  1. A
    Sovereign Industries can validly recover N150 million\text{N}150\text{ million} directly from Firm R because reinsurance creates a joint legal contract among all participating insurance companies.
  2. B
    Firm P's direct liability to Sovereign Industries is reduced to N150 million\text{N}150\text{ million} because ceding part of a risk to a reinsurer automatically transfers primary indemnity obligations.
  3. The claim against Firm R is invalid due to lack of privity of contract, and Firm P remains directly liable to Sovereign Industries for N300 million\text{N}300\text{ million}.Answer
  4. D
    Firm R is legally classified as a co-insurer in this arrangement, making it directly responsible for settling 30% of the total loss directly with Sovereign Industries.

Answer

The claim against Firm R is invalid due to lack of privity of contract, and Firm P remains directly liable to Sovereign Industries for N300 million\text{N}300\text{ million}.
The correct option highlights the essential legal boundary between co-insurance and reinsurance. Under co-insurance, Firm P underwrote a direct 60%60\% share of the policy, establishing privity of contract with Sovereign Industries and making Firm P directly accountable for 60%60\% of the N500 million\text{N}500\text{ million} loss (N300 million\text{N}300\text{ million}). Reinsurance between Firm P and Firm R is a completely separate contract; Sovereign Industries has no legal rights under Firm P's reinsurance contract and cannot issue a direct claim against Firm R.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the co-insurance relationship between Sovereign Industries, Firm P, and Firm Q.
Firm P and Firm Q are co-insurers who co-signed the policy directly with Sovereign Industries. Firm P's share of liability is 60%60\% of the total loss, which equals 0.60×N500 million=N300 million0.60 \times \text{N}500\text{ million} = \text{N}300\text{ million}. Firm Q's share is 40%40\% (N200 million\text{N}200\text{ million}).
Co-insurance involves two or more insurers directly sharing a risk with the policyholder under a joint contractual agreement.
2
Examine the legal standing of Firm R (the reinsurer) relative to Sovereign Industries (the insured).
Firm R is a reinsurer contracted independently by Firm P to cover 50%50\% of Firm P's 60%60\% exposure (50%×N300 million=N150 million50\% \times \text{N}300\text{ million} = \text{N}150\text{ million}). There is no privity of contract between Sovereign Industries and Firm R.
Reinsurance is an independent indemnity contract strictly between the ceding insurer (Firm P) and the reinsurer (Firm R). The insured is not a party to this agreement.
3
Determine the validity of the direct claim against Firm R and Firm P's total obligation.
Sovereign Industries cannot claim directly from Firm R. Firm P must pay the full N300 million\text{N}300\text{ million} to Sovereign Industries and separately recover N150 million\text{N}150\text{ million} from Firm R.
Primary insurers remain fully liable for their entire underwritten share to the policyholder regardless of any reinsurance arrangements made.

Key Concept

Distinction between Co-insurance Privity and Reinsurance Privity
Rate this question

Topics

Reinsurance, Co-insurance, and Underwriting Concepts

More questions from this topic